Not an accusation. A forensic thread. On structural neutrality failures — and their global consequences.
#UNRWA #Hamas foxnews.com/world/us-repor…
1/
"Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor."
Exodus 20:16
2/
What if a UN agency:
.hired 99% of its staff from a conflict zone,
.moved billions in Western funding annually,
.and operated with no real oversight?
It exists. It has influence. And it has a name: UNRWA.
This thread exposes the system. 🧵
3/
UNRWA isn’t just under scrutiny. It’s a structural problem. Not neutral. Not independent. Not reformable.
This is not a scandal. It’s a design.
And the West is still funding it.
4/ UNRWA isn’t failing. It’s functioning exactly as built:
✓ As a parallel Hamas-run infrastructure
✓ With symbolic UN branding
✓ And maximal international impunity
5/ Over 30,000 employees. 99.5% Palestinian.
In Gaza, that means:
A UN agency run entirely by people under Hamas governance.
That’s not infiltration. That’s co-production.
6/ The international leadership? ~120 people. Less than 0.5% of staff.
And even they negotiate directly with Hamas and PIJ.
7/ Documented case: Fathi Al-Sharif
▪ UNRWA school principal
▪ Head of staff union
▪ Active Hamas operative
UNRWA knew. Suspended. Reinstated. Hamas staged protests. UNRWA caved. UNRWA Director Lazzarini met Hamas to “resolve” the matter.
8/ This is not anecdotal.
UNRWA's entire operational logic in Gaza rests on functional appeasement of armed groups.
No biometrics. No external audits. No control over appointments.
It’s not a humanitarian agency. It’s an institutional hostage.
9/ Why do Hamas and PIJ want UNRWA?
Because controlling UNRWA means controlling:
✓ Food
✓ Schools
✓ Teachers
✓ Narrative
✓ International funds
✓ Medical records
✓ Access to media
It’s an ecosystem of legitimacy.
10/ Who pays for this? Western democracies.
EU, Germany, US, UK and others fund over $1.5B/year. They fund:
✖ Hamas-linked teachers
✖ Propaganda-aligned schooling
✖ Narrative laundering
11/ There is no audit. No transparency. No external enforcement. No neutral staffing.
Just UN status. And trust.
This trust was abused. Repeatedly. Systematically. Institutionally. Watch live: unrwa.org
12/ And this goes beyond structure. It enters propaganda. UNRWA isn’t just complicit in operations. It’s actively reshaping perception:
✓ Weaponized images
✓ Emotional blame
✓ Pre-coded guilt
13/ Case: Francesca Albanese (@FranceskAlbs), UN Special Rapporteur
She posted 4 photos alleging child starvation. Our image analysis found:
✖ Duplicated images of same child
✖ Medical context inconsistent with starvation
✖ No match to IPC Phase 5 famine standards
14/ Several key signs disprove famine:
✖ Rosy skin tone
✖ Full cheeks
✖ No marasmus signs
✖ Clean medical setting
Conclusion: visual narrative, not medical fact.
No audit. No review. No inquiry.
A full investigation into @FranceskAlbs is overdue.
15/ This violates UN ethics guidelines:
■ UNICEF, Machel Report: protect dignity of children
■ No manipulative images
■ Use with informed consent only
None of these standards were met.
Yet: image went viral.
16/ Another case: sniper allegations
“IDF shoots civilians at food lines” – claimed over 100 times
We ran probability modeling:
✖ 70% of Gaza adults have phones
✖ Aid areas are heavily filmed
✖ If true, footage would exist
21/ This isn't advocacy. It's narrative laundering.
UN Geneva amplified a militant claim without evidence. It triggered headlines, outrage, and pressure on Israel.
Result: institutional trust erodes — while Hamas keeps dictating the script.
22/ The rhetorical model:
“Israel must prove its innocence.” “Palestinian claims need no proof.” legitimized by UN.
Burden of proof reversed. Narrative becomes law. Law becomes guilt.
This isn’t justice. It’s perception warfare.
23/ UNRWA’s reach is global:
Tweets become news.
News becomes policy.
Policy becomes pressure.
From NGOs to parliaments to UN votes – the chain begins with a narrative. Backed not by evidence. But by institutional branding.
UN.
24/ End result:
✖ ICC warrants based on UNRWA-fed claims
✖ School curricula built on distorted premises
✖ Western funding flows to Hamas-affiliated structures
And still: no independent audit.
25/ This is not about denying aid. It’s about denying impunity.
No democratic system would tolerate what UNRWA normalizes:
✖ Political hiring
✖ Narrative control
✖ Terror-linked unions
✖ Child soldier summer camps
@antonioguterres @vonderleyen @bundeskanzler @realDonaldTrump 28/
If Western democracies fund an agency that launders Hamas legitimacy,they cannot claim moral neutrality.
And if they stay silent now,they won’t be able to plead ignorance later.
"Exaggeration of deprivation in Gaza by #Hamas-linked actors, supported by weak methods of IPC, UNRWA & NGOs, is not just plausible – it’s structurally expected."