“He Will Baptize You with the Holy Spirit and Fire”
What Did John the Baptist Mean? 🧵
It is one of the most quoted lines in pentecostal/charismatic circles. But also one of the most misunderstood.
John the Baptist said in Matthew 3:11: “I baptize you with water for repentance, but he who is coming after me is mightier than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.”
What did John mean by this? Was he speaking of two baptisms? One for power and one for judgment? Was he referring to Pentecost or something else? And who exactly was he speaking to?
Let’s walk through it slowly.
The Audience: To Whom Was John Speaking?
John the Baptist was not addressing a group of Spirit-filled believers. He was speaking to Israel. Specifically, Matthew 3 shows that he was addressing both the crowds coming to be baptized for repentance, and the Pharisees and Sadducees who came out to observe him.
In verse 7, John turns to the religious leaders and says, “You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come?”
So the context is not empowerment but warning. He is preparing Israel for judgment. He is announcing the arrival of the Messiah. And he is telling them that this Messiah will separate the true from the false.
So already, this statement is not a soft word of encouragement... it is a dividing line.
Water for Repentance, Spirit and Fire for Reality
John makes it clear: “I baptize you with water for repentance.”
His baptism was symbolic. It prepared people to receive the coming Christ. But it could not change the heart.
Then he contrasts his own ministry with the One who is coming: “He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire.”
Now the question is, what do those two things mean? Are they two aspects of one baptism? Or two separate destinies?
To answer that, we look at what comes immediately after.
The Winnowing Fork and the Threshing Floor
Matthew 3:12 gives us the interpretation: “His winnowing fork is in his hand, and he will clear his threshing floor and gather his wheat into the barn, but the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire.”
This is the key. John is using agricultural imagery. A winnowing fork is used to toss harvested grain into the air. The heavier wheat falls back to the ground. The lighter chaff gets carried away by the wind. The wheat is gathered. The chaff is burned.
So what does this mean?
The baptism of the Spirit is for the wheat… those who truly repent and believe in the Christ.
The baptism of fire is for the chaff… those who reject the Messiah and remain in unbelief.
In other words, this is not a single experience for all believers. This is the final division. Spirit for the saved. Fire for the judged.
Spirit for the Believer: Fulfilled at Pentecost
For the wheat, the true disciples of Christ, the promise of being baptized in the Holy Spirit was fulfilled at Pentecost.
Acts 1:5 records Jesus repeating John’s words: “For John baptized with water, but you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit not many days from now.”
Then in Acts 2, the Spirit comes. The Church is born. This is the baptism of the Spirit. It is the new covenant reality where the Spirit indwells the believer, seals them, empowers them, and unites them to Christ.
Every true Christian receives this baptism at conversion.
Paul says in 1 Corinthians 12:13: “For in one Spirit we were all baptized into one body.”
This is not a second experience for the elite. It is the foundation of the Christian life. No one belongs to Christ without the Spirit (Romans 8:9).
Fire for the Unbeliever: Judgment, Not Passion
Now what about the fire?
This is where many go wrong. They think fire is power, or passion, or spiritual intensity. But in context, fire is judgment.
Matthew 3:10: “Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.”
Matthew 3:12: “The chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire.”
John is not talking about holy passion. He is talking about wrath.
So when he says, “He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire,” he is describing two outcomes.
One leads to life.
The other leads to destruction.
Both are determined by one thing: how you respond to the Christ.
A Dividing Ministry: Christ Comes to Separate
John’s statement is not a feel-good prophecy. It is a warning.
The One who is coming is not like John. He will not just immerse people in water. He will divide the world. He will give the Spirit to those who believe. He will bring judgment to those who refuse.
This is why John was so urgent. The axe was already laid at the root. The Messiah was coming. And He was not coming to negotiate. He was coming to rule.
Why this Matters
Today, the phrase “baptized with fire” is thrown around in songs, slogans, and pulpits. But most people have no idea what it actually means. They see it as a good thing. But in the mouth of John the Baptist, it was terrifying.
We must get this right.
To be baptized in the Spirit is to be made alive in Christ.
To be baptized in fire is to face the wrath of God.
There is no middle ground.
The good news is that Christ bore the fire for us. On the cross, He drank the cup of wrath so we could receive the Spirit of life. He stood in our place as the chaff, so we could be gathered as the wheat.
But that promise only belongs to those who repent and believe.
John’s words were not written to be memorised and misused. They were spoken to prepare people for the most decisive moment in human history, the arrival of the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.
He will baptize you. The only question is: with what?
Spirit or fire?
Life or judgment?
And that is why context matters.
He, who has ears to hear, let him hear.
Jeremiah Knight.
End. 🧵
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵 Is the Baptism of the Holy Spirit a Separate Event?
Many charismatic and Pentecostal churches teach that Christians must seek a second experience called “the baptism of the Holy Spirit” often evidenced by tongues, falling, shaking, or fire.
But is this biblical? Let’s walk through it with Scripture and clarity.
What is the Baptism of the Holy Spirit?
In 1 Corinthians 12:13, Paul says: “For in one Spirit we were all baptized into one body—Jews or Greeks, slaves or free—and all were made to drink of one Spirit.”
This is not a second event. This is salvation. At the moment a person is born again, they are baptized into Christ by the Spirit and become part of the body of Christ.
Every true believer has already been baptized by the Spirit. There are no second-class Christians waiting for a “next level.”
What about Acts 19?
This is the favourite proof text used by those who teach Spirit baptism as a separate event. Let’s read the full context.
In Acts 19:1-7, Paul meets some “disciples” in Ephesus and asks:
“Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?”
They reply:
“No, we have not even heard that there is a Holy Spirit.”
The anointing is one of the most misunderstood concepts in modern Christianity, especially in Pentecostal and Charismatic circles. Today, it is portrayed as some mystical force, a spiritual electricity that knocks people to the ground, induces convulsions, causes fits of hysterical laughter, or manifests in bizarre, uncontrollable behaviour. Yet, nowhere in Scripture do we see the anointing displayed in this way.
Even more dangerous is the belief that the anointing is a physical sensation, a tingling feeling, goosebumps, or an emotional high. But feelings and emotions are not the measure of God’s power. Even unbelievers experience adrenaline rushes, and demonic spirits can counterfeit spiritual experiences (2 Corinthians 11:14). Many preachers today manipulate crowds with emotionalism and psychological tactics and then claim it as evidence of the anointing. But what does the Bible actually say?
The Biblical Meaning of the Anointing
The word anoint simply means to smear or rub with oil. In Old Testament times, people, animals, and objects were literally anointed with oil for various purposes:
Sheep were anointed to protect them from pests.
Shields were anointed to prevent them from cracking (Isaiah 21:5).
Kings were anointed to rule (1 Samuel 16:13).
Priests were anointed for service (Exodus 29:7).
Prophets were anointed to proclaim God’s Word (1 Kings 19:16).
Even pagan kings like Cyrus were called God’s anointed (Isaiah 45:1).
The anointing was never about supernatural power but God’s appointment for a specific task. Those whom God appointed, He anointed.
Jesus: The True Anointed One
The ultimate fulfilment of the anointing is found in Jesus Christ Himself. The very title “Christ” (Greek: Christos) means “Anointed One”. His anointing did not come from oil or human hands but from the Holy Spirit:
“The Spirit of the Lord is upon Me, because He has anointed Me to bring good news to the poor. He has sent Me to proclaim release to captives, and recovery of sight to the blind, to set free those who are oppressed.” (Luke 4:18, quoting Isaiah 61:1)
Notice, this anointing was not about power displays, convulsions, or feelings. It was about His divine mission to preach, heal, and set captives free from sin. Any anointing today must be understood through Christ's anointing, not mystical experiences.
One of the boldest lies ever told is that the Roman Church gave the world the Bible. But truth doesn’t bow to tradition, and history doesn’t forget the blood-stained hands that once tried to keep that very Bible locked away in a language the people could not read.
Let’s trace the real story not Rome’s revision of it.
First, the Old Testament.
Long before Peter ever stepped into Rome, the Hebrew Scriptures were already written, copied, and preserved by the Jews. By the time of Jesus, the Old Testament was complete and recognized. Jesus quoted from the Law, the Prophets, and the Writings as authoritative Scripture. He never said Rome gave them. He said, “It is written.”
The Greek Septuagint translation of the Old Testament was completed by Jewish scholars in Alexandria around 250 BC, not by any pope or council, but by those faithful to the covenant. The early church inherited this, not from Rome, but from the Jews.
Second, the New Testament.
The writings of the apostles were Scripture the moment they were penned. Paul calls Luke’s Gospel “Scripture” in 1 Timothy 5:18. Peter calls Paul’s writings “Scripture” in 2 Peter 3:16. The early church read these letters in their gatherings, copied them, and circulated them long before any Roman council even addressed the canon.
By the end of the first century, nearly every book of the New Testament was already being recognized, preached, and passed on. The Muratorian Fragment, dated around 170 AD, lists most of the New Testament books already in use.
No man wakes up one morning and becomes a heretic. It begins with a glance away from Scripture, a small compromise, a tradition elevated, a silence tolerated. And slowly, the plumb line is lost. This is the story of the Roman Church. Not a fall in a day but a slow, deliberate replacement of truth with manmade religion.
Let us walk through the cold trail of history and see how the Roman Church took what was pure and turned it into something unrecognisable, not by denying the truth, but by covering it in tradition, power, and theological fog. One doctrine at a time.
THE EXALTATION OF MARY
In the early centuries, Mary was honoured as the mother of Christ. But honour became obsession. The idea of Mary’s perpetual virginity arose in the second century, but it was not universally accepted. By the time of Ambrose and Jerome in the fourth century, it was being defended as orthodoxy.
In 431 AD, the Council of Ephesus declared Mary Theotokos (God-bearer). While this was meant to affirm Christ’s divinity, Rome hijacked it to elevate Mary. Slowly, she was no longer just the humble servant of God. She was being called Queen of Heaven.
By the Middle Ages, prayers to Mary were common. Pope Leo X approved the Ave Maria as liturgy in the early 1500s. In 1854, Pope Pius IX declared the Immaculate Conception of Mary (that she was conceived without sin). In 1950, Pope Pius XII added the Assumption of Mary into heaven. None of these are found in Scripture. Not one.
What began as respect turned into idolatry. She was made co-redemptrix, mediatrix, advocate. But Paul said “there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus” (1 Timothy 2:5). Rome ignored this and gave her a throne beside the Son of God.
PRAYING TO SAINTS AND PATRONAGE
Early Christians honoured martyrs and were inspired by their faith. But in the third and fourth centuries, the Church began praying to them, not just remembering them.
The Communion of Saints was twisted. By the time of Gregory the Great (Pope from 590 to 604), the practice of assigning patron saints to causes and cities became official.
By the 8th century, people were praying to saints for rain, harvest, fertility, protection. This was not intercession. It was necromancy repackaged in religious language.
God forbids speaking to the dead (Deuteronomy 18:11). Christ taught us to pray “Our Father”, not “O Saint Anthony.” Yet Rome teaches millions to direct their pleas to those who have died. This is not faith. It is rebellion against the sufficiency of Christ.
The simplicity of prayer, our crying out to our Father through the Son by the Spirit, was replaced by heavenly bureaucracy.
You’ve heard the claim—usually spoken with misplaced confidence:
“You Protestants wouldn’t even have a Bible if it weren’t for Rome.”
It sounds persuasive... until you actually open a Bible—or a history book.
Let’s set the record straight.
Let’s walk through the facts, the Scriptures, and the historical record.
And let’s shatter this myth—once and for all. 👇
No, Rome did not give us the Bible.
God gave us the Bible.
“All Scripture is breathed out by God…” — 2 Timothy 3:16
The Bible was inspired by the Holy Spirit, written by prophets and apostles, and recognized by the people of God long before Rome ever held a council.
The Old Testament was settled BEFORE Jesus was born.
Jesus affirmed a fixed canon of the Hebrew Scriptures—the same 39 books Protestants use today.
“From the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms…” — Luke 24:44
This 3-part division matches the Jewish canon (Tanakh), not the Roman Catholic Old Testament, which includes seven apocryphal books rejected by the Jews.
✅ Confirmed by:
Josephus (c. 90 AD) — “We have only twenty-two books… believed to be divine.” (Against Apion, 1.8)
Council of Jamnia (c. 90–100 AD) — Affirmed the Hebrew canon post-Temple destruction
Even Jerome (4th century) called the Apocrypha “ecclesiastical,” not canonical.
Rome added books that Jesus never quoted, Jews never accepted, and the early Church freely debated.
The Evolution of Roman Catholic Dogmas vs. the Unchanging Word of God - A Thread 🧵
The Roman Church claims to be the Church—built on Peter, sustained by apostolic succession, and entrusted with infallible truth. But history tells a different story.
What we see is not continuity with Christ and His apostles—but corruption, contradiction, and creeping inventions.
Let’s walk through it—doctrine by doctrine—and test Rome’s claims by the infallible standard of God’s Word.
FOUNDATION OR FICTION?
Rome says its authority rests on Peter as the "rock" (Matthew 16:18), and thus the pope is Christ’s vicar.
But Scripture teaches that the Church’s only foundation is Christ:
“For no one can lay a foundation other than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ.” — 1 Corinthians 3:11
Peter himself calls Jesus the cornerstone (1 Peter 2:6) and never refers to himself as a pope. Paul rebukes Peter (Galatians 2:11–14), proving that no apostle was infallible.
The Church is built on Christ and the teaching of all apostles, not on a single man.
431 AD — THE TITLE “MOTHER OF GOD” AND MARIAN DEVOTION BEGINS
At the Council of Ephesus, the term Theotokos (God-bearer) was given to Mary. While it aimed to defend the divinity of Christ, it opened the floodgates to Marian veneration.
That council didn’t just settle a Christological debate — it repositioned Mary from humble servant to a semi-divine intercessor.
By the 6th century, prayers like the Sub Tuum Praesidium were in use:
“We fly to thy patronage, O holy Mother of God…”
Yet Jesus taught:
“Blessed rather are those who hear the word of God and keep it.” — Luke 11:28
Mary is honored in Scripture, but never invoked or venerated. The Apostles never prayed to her. Rome exalts the mother where the Bible exalts the Son.