🧵🧵🧵🧵It would appear @MelTankardReist has been a very busy woman indeed. In Oct 2019, she submitted a proposal to the Australian House of Rep Standing Committee on Social Policy and Legal affairs about Age Verification.
Now, this woman sits as a "shareholder" in a trial for the very things that will lead to "age verification software".
This woman isn't a psychologist, not a sociologist, not even a biologist- she has the laughable degree of "journalism", something my program(biology) and every other STEM one makes fun of.
She has no basic understanding of data and cites herself, as if her writing x amount of books matters, because the books do not get backed up by real global trends, which is also why she is eager to censor and silence. Shall I quickly release 8 books? Perhaps I can get a 9th out before her and she will be forced to listen to me?
Thank you @Jamster1023 for putting this on my radar.
and is submission number 177 for you to read for yourself.
In this document, Melinda uses a bunch of anecdotal evidence as well as sites poorly done studies that are all easily debunk or refuted with REAL data, but we all know she only sources things that support her claims, or just makes things up.
This is the same woman who lets her "org" @collectiveshout retweet actual misogynists because they put ZERO thought into what they do and makes outlandish claims like rape games are being targeted to 12 year olds.
They also refuse to acknowledge me as a woman, and on their website label me a man. Basic research- corrected what, 30 times now? still no change or retraction.
THIS is the science they wont listen to, because it does not lead to increase in control from government. In truth, sexual violence around the world is decreasing, even if slowly- though areas importing illegals have increased crime and rapes...hmmm, interesting, isn't it?
This directly contradicts her claim that more people are consuming porn and suddenly there is a rise of sexual violence against women. It just isn't true.
I can link plenty of studies but we know actual facts are not part of Melinda's care. She is anti woman in every sense of the word, and presents it as being hostile towards men, her and her group CONSTANTLY blaming them and will NEVER engage with woman against them. Remember, she threatened to sue a woman in 2012 and was turned into a laughing stock.
And remember, we dissect this because this is who the "progressive" australian government is listening to and who is taking credit for @visa and @mastercard. Either Visa and MC need to sue her and her group, or they are indeed incapable of running their own companies and a bunch of dried up geese long past their primes need to tell them how to enforce their "rules".
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵🧵🧵🧵Naturally, I can't just sit back. I needed to know who else was on this "stakeholder advisory board" and once again, I implore people to realize, this is not a "left vs right" situation. This is "us vs them"
Press X to doubt on this "impartial approach", it is in this groups best interest to actually be "impartial", which they will, because they are attempting to "solve a problem". Instead of promoting families to family, they instead want to shut down everything they don't like.
From Meta, to social groups full of useless journalists, and politicians, this collection of losers is going to screw Australia over VERY badly.
I'm surprised they did not include Melinda's love of cuties in the description for her.
In a completely normal world, a handful of these people would be unemployed or doing something actually useful, but thanks to government wanting to infiltrate as much as possible into the common folks life, they get to do this kind of bogus work. It is with 0 shock we have @Meta staff (former and current) on the board.
🧵🧵🧵This is my attempt to map Visa and Mastercard Censorship.
This is in regards to @CollectiveShout taking ownership of pushing them, but this timeline shows activity back to 2016 for @visa and @mastercard
This thread will break down segments, and provide close ups.
Reminder:
Collective shout and NCOSE and other groups are currently labeling all anime and Grok’s Ani (@elonmusk ) as childlike in order to get it banned under “illegal content”
Collective shout labeled me as a man because they claim to be pro-woman and they can’t have a woman talking back
Collective shout does not allow dissent, all views of Melinda most likely belong to all women.
Collective shout chases bakers, ads, clothing, playboy, charities, Detroit become human, GTA V, perfume, makeup, by harassing businesses with emails. But they Support Cuties (2020), the film that actually exploited little girls and saw 650 auditions which included sexual twerking.
2016, 2017, both links talk about how payment processors are becoming anti NSFW for adults, flesh and blood, nothing about art yet.
Come 2018, that changes after FOSTA SESTA passes- NCOSE was a big push. The language scares payment processors into feeling responsible for “illegal content”
April 2021, Mastercard changes its rules and sites @NCOSE as one of its advisors. NCOSE is currently labeling all anime and grok Ani as childlike to get it banned.
🧵🧵🧵There is a movement happening among certain "exploitation" groups- namely @NCOSE and @Collectiveshout to label Grok's Ani as "child like".
This is a direct attack on @ElonMusk and in the following posts will show this, along with recap everything I have spoken on. This is a nefarious tactics to possibly cause legal harm to Elon, and is a greater attack on fiction in general.
1) Melinda and Dani- Dani works for @NCOSE and Melinda is the founder of CollectiveShout.
2) Haley McNamara is a former DC mayor advisor, well connected to DC politicians. She and her group, NCOSE, are labeling Ani as "child like"
3+4) Haley tweets out a petition to PRESSURE APPLE, not regulator boards that already allow Ani to exist, to remove. This is important because in a statement from Tumblr, they said app stores are bullies similar to payment processors
The petition makes the claim that @Elonmusk is intentionally releasing a product that features "child like" anime images and make a fuss about "sexually explicit conversations".
They frame the bot being prompted to say something means they are justified in calling it "child like", but their example is the worst, most ridiculous thing:
"Little thing, barely reaching the kitchen counter". They are also upset with limited to no age verification. This is important for later.
I, a 33 year old women of 5 ft 4 stature, often make jokes with my husband, 6 ft 9, that i am too short to reach the bottom shelf....
It amazes me how absolutely useless these twats are. You’ve got “perceived experts” yet you still need everyone else to make what you want?
Just go make your own studio with the money. Stop pulling stunts like this. People are over it. Your shitty writing doesnt sell. Companies are bloated because youre all useless, takes 10 people to do the job of 1 at ubisoft when you have a team of 30 all doing the job of 500.
Go away. Go make your own thing. And leave everyone else alone.
No one wants your shit. How do we all know? You admit it. Youre “losing ground” because what you make is softer than a freshly laid chipotle stool on the sidewalk in Seymour tx, august 12th 1936.
Make a good game. Earn the love, not beg for it.
But you dont want that. You want “validation”. And you want it now.
You hate gamers. You dont care what the issue is. And youll never get a dime from us.
Everyone is sick of the self aggrandizing and self Fellatio circle jerk goofball awards and dei committees.
🧵🧵🧵Want to know who could possibly influence rockstar games and GTA? I’m sure you all remember the articles floating around about GTA V randomly removing “transphobic” content, but of course leaving in every other “harmful joke” about everyone else…
But did you ever wonder who actually triggered that change?
It’s a group called OMG- out making games. This is directly connected to UKIE- a middle man between government/policy and entertainment. If you want to do business and possibly have a voice in parliament, and you have a UK location, you are practically forced to work with these individuals.
James Dodd runs UKIE’s DEI sector, works on OMG, and put his lame quote not only on Martin Tripp Associates website but front and center on Raise The Game pledge page, which is a DEI pledge.
Martin Tripp associates installs c-suite level people into companies. Their website is horrifying.
Do I think GTA is done for because of this? Normies will buy the crap out of it day 1- that’s all I know.
Do I think they’ll be reigned in and not allowed to make whatever joke they want? Absolutely.
The group is a collection of DEI lovers and happily hops on whatever band wagon they can and I’m unsure how rocksteady had any money to fund them, but I’m sure they budget it in because a guy from rocksteady is actually on this board.
“Safe in our world” is exactly what it sounds like. Another money siphon.
They’re very concerned over Meta’s changes :,)
They’ve also got some bogus awards to prop themselves up, which is a common tactic since about 2010~ it’s always been a thing but it became more aggressive then. Gotta have a bullshit participation trophy.
That’s also why people are big ass mad over the TRGAs, because it isn’t THEIR SIDE doing it.