Have you ever heard what 🇬🇧Britain did to 🇩🇪Königsberg, modern day 🇷🇺Kaliningrad? They will tell you it was “necessary” or they won’t mention it at all.
But here’s what really happened🧵👇
Nothing, absolutely nothing, came close to the hell the British Bomber Command unleashed on Königsberg in 1944. On the nights of August 26–27 and 29–30, Britain tried to erase it the historical center of the city.
Arthur “Bomber” Harris, the mastermind of firebombing tactics, sent his most ruthless squad Bomber Group No. 5.
Civilians First
174 and 189 four-engine Lancaster bombers carried out two separate raids on Königsberg in late August 1944. During the second raid alone, they dropped approximately 480 tons of high-explosive and incendiary bombs on the city center
The first wave tore through the Maraunenhof district, smashing streets like Cranzer Allee, Herzog-Albrecht-Allee, and Wallring.
Yes, a few barracks were hit. But most bombs fell in residential districts. Families. Civilians.
🔸~4,000 people were killed (some estimates go higher)
🔸~200,000 left homeless (Königsberg's pre-war population was ~370,000)
That’s the “moral high ground” they never talk about.
Not Collateral - Intentional
While during the first bombing some military barracks were also hit, allowing, perhaps, for claims of an “indiscriminate bombardment” of both civilian and military targets, the strike of August 29–30, 1944 was pure aerial terror, aimed exclusively at civilian infrastructure.
Moreover, the British bombers, taking the shortest route from England to Königsberg, violated Swedish airspace, a blatant breach of Sweden’s neutrality that prompted an official diplomatic protest from the Swedish government.
Architectural Genocide
All historic buildings with their unique interior furnishings were destroyed, including:
🔸 the Cathedral and twelve other churches
🔸 the Royal Castle
🔸 the Old and New Universities along with numerous institutes and clinics
🔸 the Kneiphof Town Hall (which housed the City History Museum)
🔸 the Opera House
🔸 the State and University Library
🔸 the picturesque warehouse district
🔸 the oldest bookstore Gräfe und Unzer (founded in 1722)
🔸 and half of all the city’s schools.
They bombed to break morale.
But morale stood. The city didn’t.
The real question is: was that ever truly the goal?🤔
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🇷🇺 Kaliningrad is not a “victim of Soviet occupation.” It’s a city that was rebuilt from the ruins of a former Nazi military center.
The historical Königsberg wasn’t “nearly destroyed” by the Soviets, it was flattened by British and American bombings in 1944, long before the Red Army arrived. Funny how that part is always skipped.
Let me take you on a mini virtual tour🧵👇
After World War II, in which the Soviet Union lost 27 million people, including ~18 million civilians, the city of Königsberg was left in ruins. Over 80% of the buildings were destroyed, and the infrastructure was completely wiped out.
Almost the entire German population was evacuated or fled before and during the Red Army’s advance. According to the Department of Population Registration and Management, 23,247 [German] residents were registered as of April 26, 1945.
Photo: Kaliningrad, 2025
Königsberg was officially handed over to the USSR under the 1945 Potsdam Agreement, as part of the Allies’ legal post-war settlement.
The Transfer of Crimea in 1954: Violations of Law, Khrushchev’s Personal Ambitions, and the Role of the Ukrainian Nomenklatura
Originally part of the Russian Empire, Crimea became part of the RSFSR when the Soviet republics were set up. So, from 1921 until 1954 it was officially Russian. Then, in February 1954, Khrushchev signed a decree moving Crimea into the Ukrainian SSR, selling it as a friendly “brotherly” gesture between Russians and Ukrainians. In reality, he was playing political games to boost his own clout and completely ignored the constitutional rules of both the USSR and the RSFSR.
Let's unpack 👇🧵
Constitutional and International Law Violations
The 1954 transfer violated at least Articles 16 and 18 of the 1936 USSR Constitution, sidestepped the full Supreme Soviet’s monopoly on major decisions, ignored any local referendum, and was enforced through political purges rather than legal channels.
🔸No proper agreement from Russia:
According to Soviet law at the time (the 1936 USSR Constitution), you couldn’t just give territory from one republic (like Russia) to another (like Ukraine) without getting proper agreement from the republic losing the territory. On February 5, 1954, when Russian leaders gathered to decide if Crimea should move to Ukraine, they needed at least 19 out of 37 members present to make their decision official. But only 15 showed up. That's like trying to hold a vote without enough voters present. It doesn’t count.
🔸The wrong people made the decision:
The law stated clearly that only the entire Supreme Soviet (like a big parliament) could change borders between republics. Instead, a smaller group (the Presidium) made this decision quickly and secretly, without letting the full parliament debate or vote on it. It’s like if a few officials made a major decision without asking the rest of the government.
🔸Nobody asked the people of Crimea:
Usually, when big changes like this happened, the Soviet system required at least some kind of public discussion or vote among the people directly affected. In Crimea, nobody held any referendum or even public debates about becoming part of Ukraine.
Many Crimeans actually felt uneasy or worried, but their voices were ignored. According to Oleg Volobuev, who was living in Crimea at the time, things were far from calm: “the mood on the peninsula was anxious, panic even. From time to time you’d see graffiti hinting at a hidden protest, and conversations made it even clearer.” After all, at the moment of the transfer, ethnic Russians still made up the majority of Crimea’s population.
🔸One brave guy who spoke up got punished:
Pavel Titov was a local leader in Crimea who openly opposed Khrushchev’s idea. Instead of listening to his concerns, Khrushchev quickly fired Titov and gave him a less important job in Moscow. Dmitry Polyansky, another leader who enthusiastically supported Khrushchev’s plan, was promoted to replace Titov. This shows the transfer wasn't really about "the friendship", but about politics and power.
Khrushchev didn’t hand over Crimea just to be nice. He did it to win friends in Ukraine.
Khrushchev built his entire career in the Ukrainian SSR. Despite being ethnically Russian and born in central Russia, he cultivated a strong Ukrainian affiliation in his rhetoric and alliances. Even today, many still consider him Ukrainian. After Stalin died in 1953, there was a fierce power struggle in Moscow between guys like Malenkov, Beria, and Khrushchev and Khrushchev wasn’t the obvious winner. That’s why he needed Ukraine’s backing more than anything. The transfer of Crimea to Ukraine wasn’t about friendship or fixing the economy. According to official statistics, between 1946 and 1950 Crimea’s economy was fully restored to its pre-war levels, and industrial production rose by 8% over that period.
As historian Roy Medvedev puts it, “The real reason for transferring Crimea was Khrushchev’s desire to win the sympathies of the Ukrainian party elite.”
Medvedev reminds us that from 1938 to 1949, before moving to Moscow, Khrushchev led the Communist Party of Ukraine. “He can certainly be considered one of the architects of the republic’s party elite in the 1930s and 1940s, and he maintained close ties with Ukraine afterward.” Khrushchev counted on support from this Ukrainian “clan” even after he reached the top in Moscow: “Trust from comrades in Ukraine was Khrushchev’s main political capital.”
It’s also worth noting that Khrushchev’s 1955 amnesty led to the mass release of Ukrainian collaborators and Banderites.
When my foreign friends visit Moscow, they’re always surprised by how deep the metro is. And it’s true once you get on the escalator, it just keeps going and going. But there’s a reason for that.
The Moscow Metro was originally designed as a bomb shelter. Many stations are built 40 to 80 meters underground, with hermetically sealed doors, autonomous ventilation, and water supply systems.
During World War II, it served not only as a shelter but also as a hospital and even a command center for the Soviet High Command (Stavka). Some stations are even reinforced to withstand a nuclear strike.
Near the Kirovskaya station (now Chistye Prudy) there is a bunker that included a war room for the Stavka (High Command) and even Stalin’s personal office.
They say a special entrance was built for the Supreme Commander through a secret shaft leading to the air defense command post. None of the General Staff officers ever saw Stalin take the regular escalator down.
Today, this bunker is open for tourists, but at the time, its location was a closely guarded secret.
👇 Preparations for the celebration of November 7, 1941.
Joseph Stalin’s speech dedicated to the 24th anniversary of the October Revolution, delivered at a ceremonial meeting of the Moscow City Council.
Mayakovskaya Metro Station, November 6, 1941.
During World War II, according to the Moscow Metro authorities, a total of 3,800 children’s beds and 4,600 adult cots were installed in the stations. Drinking fountains and water taps were set up on the platforms, along with 25 restroom facilities. Doctors were on duty around the clock.
In the evenings, children were given milk and white bread, and some stations even showed movies to help keep up morale.
Finland’s Contacts with Germany Before the Winter War
Finland was not simply a helpless victim of Soviet aggression, as often portrayed in Western narratives. It had hostile intentions toward the USSR, ideological alignment with Germany, and was seen by the Nazis as a natural ally on the Eastern Front long before Operation Barbarossa or the winter war.
Military and political ties since the 1920s
🔸 After World War I, Finland looked to Germany as a counterweight to the Soviet threat.
🔸 In 1918, during the Finnish Civil War, German troops landed in Helsinki (Operation “Seeadler”) to support the White Finns against the Red Guard.
🔸 Many Finnish military officers were pro-German or had received training in Germany.
Economic cooperation with Weimar and later Nazi Germany
🔸 In the 1930s, Finland traded actively with Germany particularly in timber, metals, and nickel.
🔸 Germany, in turn, viewed Finland as a potential strategic partner in a future war against the USSR.
Finland as part of Germany’s Eastern strategy
🔸 As early as 1935, German military planners included Finland in scenarios for a campaign against the Soviet Union.
🔸 Throughout 1938–1939, Germany encouraged Finland to resist Soviet pressure and maintain an anti-Soviet orientation.
🔸 Secret military contacts between Finnish and German officers existed even before the outbreak of the Winter War.
Ethnic Cleansing in Karelia, USSR: Finland’s Dirty Secret of WWII
Finland was far from a victim, they were in bed with the Nazis, engaging in the same practices.
From 1941 to 1944, the Finnish army occupied Eastern Karelia (USSR), where it established a regime of terror targeting the Soviet population of the region. Not soldiers but civilians.
On October 24, 1941, the first Finnish concentration camp for Soviet civilians of Slavic origin, including women and children, was established in Petrozavodsk. The goal was ethnic cleansing: the elimination of the Russian population in the Finnish-occupied region of Karelia.
🧵👇
By the end of 1941, over 13,000 civilians were imprisoned. By mid-1942, the number rose to nearly 22,000. In total, around 30,000 people passed through 13 camps. Roughly one-third died, from starvation, disease, and forced labor. These figures do not include POW camps, where conditions were equally deadly. Since most men were drafted in the early days of the war, the majority of the labor force in the camps consisted of women and children.
In April 1942, Finnish politician Väinö Voionmaa wrote home:
“Out of 20,000 Russian civilians in Äänislinna, 19,000 are in camps. Their food? Rotten horse meat. Children scavenge garbage for scraps. What would the Red Cross say if they saw this?”
In 1942, the death rate in Finnish camps exceeded that of German ones. Testimonies describe corpses being hauled daily, teenagers forced into labor, and women and children made to work 10+ hour shifts in forests and camps, unpaid until 1943.
Camp No. 2, unofficially known as the “death camp,” was notorious for its brutality. It held “disloyal” civilians, and its commandant, Finnish officer Solovaara, became infamous for public beatings and killings. In May 1942, he staged a mass beating of prisoners simply for begging. Those who resisted forced labor, often in brutal logging camps, were beaten to death in front of others “as a lesson.”
According to the Soviet Extraordinary State Commission, Finnish forces conducted medical experiments on prisoners and branded them with hot iron unlike the Nazis, who tattooed. Finland also engaged in slave trading, selling abducted Soviet civilians for agricultural labor.
An estimated 14,000 civilians died in Karelia between 1941 and 1944, excluding POWs. But many of the dead labeled as “prisoners of war” were actually civilians: most rural Soviets lacked passports, and anyone of conscription age was assumed to be a soldier.
In 2021, the FSB declassified the names of 54 Finns responsible for the genocide of the Soviet population.
One of Russia’s most legendary landmarks is Saint Basil’s Cathedral. I’ve seen it countless times, yet as I grow older, its architecture amazes me more and more. It looks strikingly futuristic, even by today’s standards and it was built all the way back in the 16th century. The cathedral is truly one of a kind. Its architecture is filled with sacred symbolism.
A Symbol of the Heavenly Jerusalem
Saint Basil’s Cathedral was originally conceived as a symbol of the Heavenly Jerusalem - the paradise city, an earthly image of the Kingdom of God. The idea came from Metropolitan Macarius, and the architects sought to embody it in the cathedral’s design and decoration.
This is precisely why the cathedral appears so unusual. Its composition with nine chapels blooming around the central one like the petals of a flower was meant to evoke the image of the Garden of Paradise. In the ornamentation and frescoes, one finds grapevines, fantastical flowers, leaves, curls, and patterns that do not exist in nature.
These are not mere decorations, but a visual expression of spiritual meaning and heavenly imagery: the paradise.
The Eight-Pointed Star
When viewed from above, the eight smaller chapels of the cathedral form an eight-pointed star - one of the oldest Christian symbols, and a symbol of the Virgin Mary. This design was no accident, as the cathedral is dedicated to the Intercession of the Most Holy Theotokos.
It’s incredible, but this 60-meter-tall building standing on a hill has no foundation. The entire massive structure rests on a solid stone substructure - a raised basement level. It served for a long time as a storage place for the tsar’s treasury. The entrance had been sealed off and was only rediscovered in the 1930s during restoration work.