Bar and Bench Profile picture
Aug 5 8 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Supreme Court hears a suo motu case involving the death of a 31-year-old resident doctor at the state-run RG Kar Medical College and Hospital in Kolkata, West Bengal.

Bench: Justice MM Sundresh and NK Singh Image
The case, involving a junior doctor's death at a college seminar hall, has triggered nationwide protests, prompting the Supreme Court to take suo motu cognisance to examine workplace safety for medical professionals and issues in the RG Kar probe.
Justice MM Sundresh: Who is appearing for Union?

Counsel: I appear for Union. As far as intervenor application are concerned, the Registry was sent on email Id...whatever was received on that email I'd, NTF has considered that.....to this effect Union has also filed an affidavit in May 2025.
Counsel: Lordship, I had requested time to explain my recommendations, because it has some....

J Sundresh: When did you send it?

Counsel: 16th December.

J Sundresh: : Particular mail ID they have given. Whatever they received they have considered.

Counsel: I had requested time to explain.

J Sundresh: That is not required.
Counsel for Delhi Medical Association: Lordship, we have also given certain concrete suggestions and NTF report which has been filed..... we wanted to respond more on NTF report regrading compensation for the doctors and paramedical workers, which is very much needed...we haven't received the report by NTF also.

J Sundresh: Report be furnished to parties before us.
Sr Adv Karuna Nundy: I am for group of 25 thousand doctors and I am also for the parents of victims. Thay aspect has gone yo HC and they are considering it, however, status report hasn't been filed, even after 7 months of the directions and CBI is not....we may be coming back here on that.

With regards to NTF report, as Mylords had directed on last occasion, we have all made submissions to NTF. Now presumably next time they will come back on that...
Counsel informs the Court that, as per the Court’s earlier direction, suggestions were to be received by the NTF within six weeks, and the suggestions received during that period have been duly considered and filed.
Order: The NTF is directed to give the response to the reports filed by states and subsequent suggestions made by parties.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

Aug 7
#SupremeCourt hears the bail plea of #AshishMishra, the prime accused in the #LakhimpurKheri killings case

Bench: Justices Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan and NK Singh

Sr Adv Sidharth Dave: 20 witnesses have been examined. 20 dropped by the prosecution Image
Adv Prashant Bhushan: Please see something of importance. The last order gave liberty to Baljinder Singh to file a complaint with police officers.. the one who had a telephonic conversation... He had complained that he got threats of being met with dire consequences etc.
Bhushan: even after complaint no FIR till date. Lalita Kumari says FIR within a week. It's been one and a half month

AAG Garima Parshad: SP had called him. But he did not come or disclose identity

Justice Kant: but what's the problem in police going to him ..let complaint be verified and if cognizable let law take its course

Dave: The complaint is at the behest of SP party member Amarjeet Singh. How long should we go on and on about this
Read 6 tweets
Aug 7
#BREAKING Supreme Court to DELIVER judgment on Justice Yashwant Varma's writ petition challenging the in-house inquiry report

Bench: Justices Dipankar Datta and Justice AG Masih Image
Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal in the front row

Judges to assemble shortly

#JusticeYashwantVarma #SupremeCourt Image
Justice Dipankar Datta: We have said that lest any observations made by us may prejudice the petitioner in future proceedings. We shall tread carefully

#JusticeYashwantVarma #SupremeCourt #BurntCash Image
Read 6 tweets
Aug 6
Bombay High Court is hearing the plea of HDFC Bank MD and CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan seeking quashing of FIR filed by Lilavati Trust.

The FIR filed with the Bandra police pursuant to a magisterial order accuses Jagdishan of accepting It accuses him of accepting a ₹2.05 crore bribe from the erstwhile trustees.Image
A bench of Justice MS Karnik and NR Borkar is hearing the case.

Senior Advocate Aabad Ponda is arguing for the trust.

He says that there is no precedural flaw in the order passed by the magistrate and cannot be struck down at the stage.
Sr. Adv Ponda : On the arguments that similar allegations were made in an earlier FIR:

He says that successive FIRs are not allowed only when the earlier FIR has resulted in a trial which eventually led to a conviction or acquittal.
Read 5 tweets
Aug 6
Supreme Court hears a case challenging a Madras High Court order which directed that the Chief Minister’s name cannot be used for any schemes.

Bench: CJI BR Gavai, Justices K Vinod Chandran, and NV Anjaria Image
Sr. Adv. Mukul Rohatgi: I am a political party. The scheme is ‘Stalin is with you’. He says 9000 camps will be set up all over the state to which people can come and claim benefits under ongoing schemes.
CJI: which party do you belong to

Counsel: AIADMK.

CJI: so during AIADMK how many schemes like this were there (in the name of the CM)
Read 29 tweets
Aug 5
Bombay High Court to shortly hear HDFC Bank MD and CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan's plea seeking quashing of FIR filed by Lilavati Trust.

The FIR filed with the Bandra police pursuant to a magisterial order accuses Jagdishan of accepting It accuses him of accepting a ₹2.05 crore bribe from the erstwhile trustees.

#HDFCBank #SashidharJagdishan #LilavatitrustImage
A bench of Justices MS Karnik and NR Borkar is hearing the plea.

In the last hearing, Senior Advocate Amit Desai appearing for Jagdishan argued that the FIR was lodged with malice only to scuttle the recovery proceedings initiated by the bank against business belonging to a late trustee.

Further, he argued that the complainant trust should have followed the appropriate steps and should have filed complaint initially with the local police and then with the superior officer if he failed to take cognisance before approaching the magistrate under Section 175(3) BNSS.

He further argued that the complinant was filed by the power of attorney holder of a present trustee Prashant Mehta. The POA holder was appointed long before Mehta even became part of the trust.

He further alleged Mehta of using the trust for his perosonal objectives.
Senior Advocate Aabad Ponda arguing for the trust.

He submits that any irregularity in procedure (Here, the affidavit submitted with the complaint) doesn't mean there is failure of Justice.

He reads out precedents that affirms his stance.

Court: just crystalise your submissions.
Read 5 tweets
Aug 5
Supreme Court hears bail plea by Suryakant Tiwari who is implicated in a case involving an alleged extortion racket related to coal transportation in Chhattisgarh. The accusations involve extorting money from coal transporters, reportedly in connivance with senior bureaucrats, including Saumya Chaurasia, a former Deputy Secretary in the office of the Chief Minister of Chhattisgarh.

Bench: Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya BagchiImage
Sr. Adv. Mukul Rohatgi: the IAS officers who were the main persons behind this have been granted bail. Why should this man be kept in jail.
Sr. Adv. Mahesh Jethmalani: this man is involved in a series of scams. The last one was coal levy. They took 25 rupees per ton on coal transportation.

Court: he has been granted interim bail in the coal scam. Are you seeking cancellation only on the ground that he might threaten the witnesses?
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(