Last week, the DOJ released guidance for federal funding recipients.
The memo—which clarifies how nondiscrimination law should be applied—is a huge development for universities. A lot of their worst policies are looking more fragile than ever. 🧵
The memo—which clarifies how nondiscrimination law should be applied—is a huge development for universities. A lot of their worst policies are looking more fragile than ever. 🧵
2/ The DOJ specifically highlights the use of racial proxies. Hiring on the basis of "cultural competence" or using diversity statements is unlawful if the purpose is to give an advantage to specific racial groups.
This is an even bigger deal than it might seem.
This is an even bigger deal than it might seem.
3/ Universities often take on large-scale hiring programs that select for an emphasis on "equity."
Inevitably the programs recruit ideologues. More importantly, this criteria is justified because it's seen as a way to favor minorities. It's right there in their own documents ⬇️
Inevitably the programs recruit ideologues. More importantly, this criteria is justified because it's seen as a way to favor minorities. It's right there in their own documents ⬇️
4/ The memo notes that "diverse slate" policies are, likewise, unlawful.
5/ As I've reported over the past month, many universities routinely conduct "diversity checks" at every stage of the faculty hiring process (e.g., Cornell ⬇️).
This practice was funded and spearheaded by the federal government. Now, the DOJ is correcting course.
This practice was funded and spearheaded by the federal government. Now, the DOJ is correcting course.
Worth reading the full memo: justice.gov/ag/media/14094…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
