Police must not remain mute spectators to unlawful takeovers by political mobs, says Justice N Nagaresh while granting police protection to Kizhakkambalam Grama Panchayat for bus stand renovation works.
Kizhakkambalam Panchayat moved the Court seeking police protection to complete the construction of its modernised bus stand.
Panchayat alleged that former Panchayat President and political workers had illegally trespassed into the premises on July 4, 2025, removed barricades, damaged structures, forcibly redirected traffic, and erected an unauthorised waiting shed.
The judge had directed the police to provide protection for the completion of renovation works, while issuing a strong warning against rising mobocracy.
The Court observed that the use of muscle power to obstruct democratic institutions posed a serious threat to India’s democratic fabric.
"If such mobocracy is permitted, that will be the beginning of the end of our democratic system and rule of law. Those powers who try to take over the administration of a Panchayat today may even try to take over the State and Union Administration tomorrow", the Court cautioned, urging police to act with an iron fist.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Supreme Court Bar Association holds farewell function for Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia
#SupremeCourt #SCBA
AG R Venkataramani: emotions of a judge has to be part of justice suspension system. Justice Dhulia in case of irretrievable breakdown of marriage to deciding plea of a death row convict, he brought out the subtle interplay of emotions.
Sr Adv Vikas Singh, SCBA President: In the hijab case, I think It is not an essential part.. even if they consider it as essential.... He noted what difference will it make if they wear it.. he ensured that there is no alienation is there and they are part of the mainstream
The Supreme Court will shortly continue hearing the appeals concerning JSW Steel’s ₹19,700 crore resolution plan for Bhushan Power and Steel Limited (BPSL).
SG Mehta appears for CoC. He says "Once CoC is constituted under Section 21, it remains in place till Section 62 appeal. If an authority or body has power to do something, it can do so periodically. CoC's power cannot be extinguished after my approving the resolution plan."
SG Mehta: This is one of the worst cases of siphoning I have come across among the cases I have done. Now they are finding fault with the person who has come with best resolution plan
Supreme Court reconsiders case where it had passed adverse remarks against sitting Allahabad High Court Judge Prashant Kumar.
Bench: Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan
The Court had said Justice Kumar shouldn’t be allowed to deal with criminal cases till he demits office for encouraging criminal proceedings in a matter of civil nature.
Court: we have received an undated letter from the CJI requesting us to reconsider the directions passed in our earlier order. In such circumstances we direct the registry to re notify the matter. By our order dated 4.8.25 we set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for fresh hearing in the HC.
Delhi High Court is hearing the petition filed by 2020 Delhi riots accused Devangana Kalita seeking to inspect the CCTV footage of the riots at North-East Delhi area.
Advocate Adit Pujari appearing for Devangana Kalita - The arguments on charge are going on. The law in India today is that: prior to arguments on charge, you should get a list of unrelied upon documents and you should be allowed to inspect it.
Pujari- The learned judge has refused to give me the list of unrelied upon documents and has refused to allow me to inspect. There is a video which shows that I was not involved in violence.
Supreme Court will today rehear the challenges to JSW Steel's resolution plan for Bhushan Power and Steel Limited (BPSL). The case will be heard by a Bench led by Chief Justice of India BR Gavai and comprising Justices Satish Chandra Sharma and Vinod Chandran.
The apex court had on July 31 recalled its earlier order which had quashed the resolution plan and directed the liquidation of BPSL. barandbench.com/news/supreme-c…
On May, a Bench of Justices Bela Trivedi and Satish Chandra Sharma rejected JSW Steel's ₹19,700 crore resolution plan for Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd (BPSL), declaring it illegal. The Court has also directed BPSL's liquidation.