Supreme Court hears petition challenging Uttar Pradesh Shri Bankey Bihari Ji Temple Trust Ordinance, 2025, which seeks to regulate temple management and development in Vrindavan.
SC: We will modify the part of order of our coordinate bench as much as it affects the petitioners, and we will allow you to approach the HC against the Ordinance.
SC: We will form a committee to head the management in the meantime and we will give some kind of authorisation to that committee..
SC: We will try to upload the order by tomorrow..
SC clarifies that constitution of the committee as per the Ordinance will be kept in abeyance.
Justice Kant: We will constitute a committee in the interregnum headed by former High Court judge..
ASG Nataraj: Keeping entire Ordinance in abeyance, for the purpose of ratifying and all..
SC: Ratification and all you can do..
SC: At this stage, the ASG has pointed out that some parallel proceedings, purportedly filed in public interest, are being taken up by the High Court in which an amicus was appointed and the judge has passed an order. As per an order of July 21, the judge has questioned the passing of the ordinance and made certain observations. With a view to prevent parallel proceedings, the observations made by the judge shall be stayed.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#DelhiHighCourt to hear today UK-based arms consultant Sanjay Bhandari’s plea challenging a trial court order declaring him a “fugitive economic offender."
Justice Neena Bansal Krishna is hearing the matter.
Supreme Court to hear first, the issue of maintainability of petitions challenging its 2022 decision in Vijay Madanlal vs Union of India, wherein provisions of PMLA were upheld, on September 6.
Supreme Court today took up the batch of review petitions challenging its 2022 verdict.
ASG Raju: They cannot ask this court to sit in appeal.
Sr Adv Kapil Sibal: We have given a set of issues..
Sibal: the other batch of matters that was heard by Justice Kaul should also come here..
Justice Kant: For that you have to mention before CJI.
🚨 Delhi High Court to shortly hear pleas seeking an urgent stay on the release of the film Udaipur Files, alleging that the film promotes communal hatred and violates certification norms under the Cinematograph Act, 1952.
The film, based on the 2022 murder of Udaipur tailor Kanhaiya Lal, is slated for release on July 11, 2025. Lal was brutally murdered by Mohammad Riyaz Attari and Ghaus Mohammad by slitting his throat.
Yesterday, the HC had directed the producers of the film to arrange a private screening of the movie and its trailer for all counsels, after the CBFC informed that it had mandated 40 to 50 cuts before granting certification
Shortly:-
#SupremeCourt to hear a batch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Waqf Amendment Act, 2025.
Bench: CJI BR Gavai & Justice AG Masih
#WaqfAmendmentAct #WaqfBoard #Waqf
Matter taken up.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta: Court had identified and earmarked three specific issues. We have already filed our response addressing these issues. However, the petitioner's written submissions now go beyond the scope of those three issues and raise several additional matters.
SG Mehta: I have filed my affidavit strictly in response to the originally framed three issues. Therefore, I respectfully request that the proceedings be confined to those three issues alone.
@ArvindKejriwal @CBIHeadquarters Special Counsel DP Singh, appearing for CBI: Kejriwal is the 'sutradhaar' of the entire excise scam. I will show facts proving the same.
@ArvindKejriwal @CBIHeadquarters Singh: the investigation would have been incomplete without Kejriwal's arrest. Within 1 month of his arrest, CBI filed a chargesheet, therefore showing that the investigation had reached the advanced stage.
#BREAKING Bareilly Court delivers historic verdict, sentencing a woman to 4.5 years in prison for false testimony and false rape accusations. Court justifies sentence, matching it to accused man's time served
"It is highly objectionable to use police and court as medium to achieve one's illegal objective," court said emphasizing fair treatment for both genders
Court also orders the girl to pay Rs. 5,88,822, equivalent to UP government's prescribed unskilled laborer wages, as fine to falsely accused man