Sarah Cottinghatt Profile picture
Aug 8 20 tweets 3 min read Read on X
3 important things to know about how the brain works:

Brains -
➡️Predict
➡️Preserve
➡️Protect

(Inspired to write this by a great talk from @C_Hendrick and panel with @HughesHaili and @PepsMccrea at the Steplab expertise conference!)
1/Brains *predict*
We don't just passively encounter our environment; we actively predict what might be about to happen. This is optimal for survival.

On what basis do we make these predictions?
Based on consolidated knowledge in long-term memory. These frameworks of knowledge allow us to anticipate what might happen and update to better reflect 'reality' (at least as we perceive it).

Why does this matter?
It has many implications - here's one. If we predict based on what we know, then we are actively experiencing the world through our own lenses. What we make of our experiences plays a role in what we will learn.

This means -
We can't expect everyone to experience the same situation in the same way and take the same things from it. We have to *guide learners' attention* to what is important...
Side note: I think this explains some aspects of what people colloquially refer to as 'karma'… e.g. if you are someone who gossips about other people, this is your predictive lens and you suspect others of gossiping about you!
For more (and better) on predictive processing. See @AdamWteach's Substack, Predictably, Correct.

Number 2...substack.com/@adamwray
2/ Brains *preserve*
The brain wants to preserve energy.
It takes energy for the brain to learn stuff for the long term - it doesn't exert this energy for everything we encounter!

In fact…
Our brains can trick us into thinking we've learned something we haven't. The feeling of familiarity is a great example.

When re-reading notes before an exam, our brains tell us "You know this - you've got it!" But in the exam, ideas fail to form!

Actually-
We have to be *explicit* with our brains about what we want long-term easy access to.

How do we do this?

By employing techniques that tell our brains -
"We need this info in the future and it won't be readily available in the environment… learn it!"

Here’s an example…
Using retrieval practice with as few cues as possible.

This tells the brain "this stuff is important & can't be easily accessed from the environment (hence why I'm making you dredge it up!". So…
Your brain exerts energy to retrieve the idea.
But it doesn't want to expend so much energy doing so in future...
So it kick-starts the consolidation process to make it easier to access next time!

What does this mean?
Obviously it means we should incorporate effective learning strategies in lessons, but it also means we should help learners understand *their role* in the learning process: to learn they must use techniques that tell the brain "consolidate this!"

To help teach them this -
It may help to build 4 things in our learners (McDaniel, Einstein & Een, 2021):
*Knowledge* of good learning strategies
*Belief* the strategies work (direct experience)
*Commitment* to the strategies by seeing their value
*Planning* to use the strategies by devising action plans
3/ Brains *protect*
As we've just seen, not all memories are consolidated for the long term - long-term knowledge is *hard won*!

What the brain doesn't want is for new information to corrupt stored knowledge (schema) that's generally useful for prediction.

So what does it do?
The brain has a slow learning system (requiring rest and sleep) to extract commonalities from across memories, gradually updating what we know for the long term.

But, what if we could learn faster without corrupting prior knowledge?
We can IF the new stuff we learn chimes strongly with knowledge that's already stored - this knowledge is safe to store quickly since it won't corrupt anything!

Generally, research has agreed that new ideas which link to existing knowledge can be learned faster, but…
Caveat!

It's not enough to just assume students will use their existing knowledge on a topic to learn related ideas. There's more to it. It's likely we need to help them *activate and link* the relevant knowledge.

END - thanks for getting to this point!

References -
Predict:
Kroes & Fernández (2012)
Clark (2013)

Preserve:
Learning is energy intensive: van Rossum & Pache (2024)
Memory consolidation is selective: Lindsey & Litwin-Kumar (2024)
Retrieval speeds up learning: Antony et al. (2017); Ferreira et al. (2019)
Protect:
Catastrophic interference: McClelland (2013)
Slower learning system: Dudai (2015;
Faster learning with prior knowledge: Tse et al. (2007; 2011)…
… but there's more to it! Buchin & Mulligan (2025)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sarah Cottinghatt

Sarah Cottinghatt Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SCottinghatt

Jun 11
First up @C_Hendrick 🧵 Image
Are we evidence informed ?

We expect teachers to make fine judgements about important things without good evidence…

Health produces loads more research than the field of education -
9/10 teachers believe in things that are not true about learning 🙁 Image
Read 21 tweets
Feb 14
🧵Getting people to learn is *hard*.

I'm trying to flip the way I think so that I make better assumptions about learning.

Here's how it's going (plea for help at the end)

I now see three learning DEMONS 👿👿👿
....
👿#1 Assuming Attention

The Demon: thinking that students are listening without any actual evidence (silence is a poor proxy!).

@adamboxer1 writes so well on this here and in threads:

What to do about it:achemicalorthodoxy.co.uk/2022/11/30/the…
Get 100% visible attention:

Use clear commands like "Hands empty, eyes on me" to ensure everyone appears focused before you start talking.

But this alone isn't enough -
Read 9 tweets
Jan 30
Working with schools and trusts has taught me a very valuable lesson.

There’s almost *no point* in talking about improving teaching practice without one key thing:

A *shared mental model* of how people learn

Why is this so important? Let’s break it down...🧵 Image
#1: It Focuses Everyone on the Same Problems

Our mental models guide how we *see* situations, i.e. what we notice and interpret.

Very different mental models of how learning happens = very different conceptions of great teaching.

This is an issue when-
- we try to diagnose what teachers might need support with.

We spot very different problems! Image
Read 13 tweets
Dec 19, 2024
Behaviour change… an elusive goal!

We can know what to do but this doesn’t mean we do it (hence why many New Year’s resolutions fail).

This app gives examples of many well-evidenced behaviour change mechanisms -
‘BCT taxonomy’
Handily groups techniques into categories and explains each one.

I really like how they can relate to coaching… Image
Here’s a sample of a few of my favourites

1/ Discrepancy between current behaviour and goal Image
Read 6 tweets
Dec 4, 2024
Some ideas you just keep coming back to in your work.

Here are *5 powerful ideas* and phrases I keep returning to which help me think and act better as a teacher educator:
1/ Upstream thinking

@PepsMccrea 's Evidence Snacks are fab.


Peps says:

"our efforts can sometimes be better directed at tackling problems before they occur… towards prevention. This is 'upstream thinking’."

What does this mean for PD?snacks.pepsmccrea.com/p/upstream-thi…
Maybe the cause(s) of the problem are upstream of the event:

E.g.

Are students struggling with the independent work because the instructions weren't clear or was there also/instead an upstream cause around the way ideas were taught?

See Upstream by Dan Heath for more on this
Read 12 tweets
Oct 28, 2024
@MattTeachCoach brilliant presentation

Brief 🧵so all can get the takeaways… Image
The coaching sweet spot is when it is personal, cognitive and technical Image
Mental models are like a story board, a narrative and a sequence. Coaching can support teachers to develop these Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(