Today marks 7 years since I began filming "What Killed Michael Brown?" Since its release, it amassed nearly 1,500 Amazon Prime reviews and a 4.8-star rating, placing it among upper-tier documentaries.
Then the reviews vanished.🧵
When I visited the Amazon Prime page last June, only 17 reviews remained and the rating dropped to 4.5. Its hard-won credibility had been erased. What happened?
For those who have forgotten, Amazon initially banned our documentary in the wake of George Floyd’s death, when Black Lives Matter’s narrative held sway over public discourse. Only after a national outcry — sparked by the Wall Street Journal, Fox News and others like Hollywood in Toto — did Amazon relent and platform the film. We premiered to the number one spot for documentaries and stayed in the top ten for nearly two months. Each review generated more views.
Now, nearly 1,500 reviews and its accompanying 4.8-star rating have vanished. Since June, I have been working with Amazon’s help desk and my contact, “Mary,” has been as helpful as possible even though she admits this is not her area of expertise. I provided her with the screenshot below from 2022 that showed proof:
After some back-and-forth, she relayed the message from higher ups that the reviews were lost in a “merger,” and no recovery was possible. I responded with: didn’t the vaunted Amazon Web Services have redundancies that saved backups? Why did some reviews survive, especially the ones before 2023, if the merger supposedly erased the slate? I also relayed that my online search did not reveal other films experiencing the same issue. I requested to speak with someone directly responsible and “Mary” said she would try. That is where we stand.
In our review-driven world, a five-year old film with just 17 reviews lacks credibility, doomed by algorithms. Not only that, those missing reviews were my filmmaker’s resume, critical for establishing credibility and for raising funds for future projects. Amazon received 50% of every dollar that film made and it would seem that protecting the integrity of the film’s page would be a given — a trust between corporation and artist, if such a thing exists.
Above all, those reviews, many of them written from heart, gave visibility to a film that stands alone against a half-dozen other films pushing the false narratives that came out of Ferguson. If the reviews are not restored, will What Killed Michael Brown?” slip into irrelevance?
When my father and I decided to make this film in 2017, America was steeped in a relentless narrative of systemic racism. Since the killing of Trayvon Martin in 2012, bookstores lined their windows with titles on redlining, mass incarceration, and the New Jim Crow. Black Lives Matter signs dotted suburban lawns. Universities and corporations mandated racial sensitivity trainings and set up hotlines to report any hint of racism. Ibram X. Kendi’s National Book Award win amplified his decree: refusing to be antiracist was tantamount to being racist. In contrast, my father’s book, Shame, one of his finest, was published during this time and largely ignored, drowned out by the era’s new racial orthodoxy. There was no escaping the charge that America was, once again, systemically racist.
In a sense, our decision to make this film was our “screw you” to this orthodoxy. I remember telling my father how I was driving through Pomona College and had seen the oversized prints of the New York Times article on the Ferguson shooting plastered to the side of a building. Everything had been redacted in the article to leave only one impression: a white cop shot a black teenager with promise.
It wasn’t art; it was a mandate to conform. Universities, once hubs of debate, became echo chambers, drilling the narrative into students’ minds. The cancel culture of that time was swift and unforgiving. To doubt the narrative—however rooted in facts or reason—was to risk social crucifixion. Careers were obliterated, reputations torched, voices silenced for daring to ask: what actually happened? The pressure to comply, fueled by white guilt — the fear of being labeled a bigot — coerced millions into silent agreement. Truth was the enemy; ideology was king.
But we had no fear of making this film. Since the late 1980s, my family had faced one cancellation after another, and we became outsiders with nothing to lose. We poured our souls into this project, challenging the narrative for Ferguson’s fractured streets to Obama’s ideologically driven White House. The result was a film we believe delivers a definitive account of what killed Michael Brown—not a tidy fable, but a raw, unflinching reckoning with truth.
Most of all, we are proud that we released What Killed Michael Brown? in the frenzied aftermath of George Floyd’s death. While the ongoing hysteria fueled demands for simplistic verdicts on race and justice, our film stood as a quiet rebellion, a testament to the power of honest inquiry to loosen the stranglehold of ideological conformity. My father, a lone voice on nightly news, dared to call the charge of systemic racism a lie. The film went viral, resonating with countless viewers who flooded our inbox with gratitude. They thanked us not just for the film, but for emboldening them to stand firm in truth, to resist the suffocating tide of cancel culture. Today, that culture’s once-iron grip has weakened, thanks in part to those who drew courage from our work.
It was these same individuals—ordinary Americans seeking truth over ideology—who penned the heartfelt reviews that propelled the film to prominence. Their words were not mere ratings; they were declarations of defiance, amplifying a truth the gatekeepers sought to bury. So, the mysterious erasure of those reviews—reduced to a paltry 17 by last June—is no trivial matter. It’s a battle to keep the film’s voice alive in a culture that still seeks to silence dissent. To lose those reviews is to risk losing the chorus of voices that dared to speak, to question, to stand unbowed. And it is my hope that I will be able to resolve this issue with Amazon Prime.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
White Guilt and Radical Islam
by Shelby Steele, 2006.
White guilt obscures the crucial reality in the Middle East: History has left the Islamic world behind. Shelby Steele on the massive sense of inferiority that so enrages Islamic militants.
🧵
The simple back-and-forth of war can create the illusion that both sides have a legitimate point to make even when this is not so, and it is clear that Hezbollah’s cause greatly benefited from war’s “equalizing” effect. This Shiite militia seems to have known that merely fighting Israel would gain legitimacy for its cause. A cease-fire would make it a “partner” in peace. The Israeli military Goliath would make it a David whose passion proved the truth of its cause. But amid all the drama of this war, there has been very little talk of exactly what Hezbollah’s cause is.
And, of course, it is not just Hezbollah’s cause. Hamas is one more in a family of politicized terrorist groups spread across the Muslim world. And beyond these more-conventional groups there is the free-floating and worldwide terrorism of groups such as Al Qaeda. In Europe, there are cells of self-invented middle-class terrorists living modern lives by day and plotting attacks on modernity by night. And around these cells there is often a nourishing atmosphere of fellow-traveling. Then come the radical nation-states in league with terrorism, Iran and Syria most prominent among them. From nations on the verge of nuclear weapons to isolated individuals—take the recent Seattle shootings—Islamic militancy grounded in hatred of Israel and America has become the Muslim world’s most animating idea. Why?
What happened on October 7, 2023, unleashed antisemitism in the United States. The antisemitism from the Left surprised many of us but was not unexpected. The antisemitism that emerged from the Right, however, was a different breed.
Here's the story of my personal encounter with two antisemites.
Very long thread🧵(Link at end):
Since the 1960s, the Left has not only racialized us but tried to impose a racial order grounded in liberation ideology upon our society. It sought to divide Americans into the oppressed “people of color” versus the “white” oppressors. The Left gaslit many American Jews into believing that their white skin was the main feature of their identity. It was only from this place of whiteness — along with renouncing all the privileges that came with said identity — that these Jews could side with the oppressed in their fight against systemic racism. In the days after October 7, many of these Jews, expecting some form of human understanding or sympathy, were stunned to see their allies siding with Hamas. These Jews then found themselves cast to the side of the oppressors along with the charges of apartheid, genocide, and occupation. The only permissible Jew was one who denounced Israel.
The antisemitism that emerged from the Right, however, was a different breed. One doesn’t have to spend much time on X (Twitter) to see how prevalent and mainstream it has become. Social media influencers often target Israel only, lower themselves to spew outlandish conspiracies, and revive age-old blood libels to online audiences of millions. When pressed, they claim innocence and that they are only asking questions.
With a stroke of the pen, President @DonaldTrump signed an executive order that removed President Lyndon Johnson’s executive order 11246 —which established Affirmative Action — from the books.
The damage done to our nation was profound.
🧵
The great sin of Affirmative Action was that it kept the idea of race alive in our minds. It turned everyone into an identity of immutable characteristics. It deluded us into thinking we could use the poison of race to engineer redemptive innocence from America’s racist past.
This is not what many foot soldiers in the Civil Rights movement wanted. They sought to abolish the racial categories that undergirded the white supremacy racial order. White meant supremacy, black meant inferiority, & that had to be destroyed. Becoming an American was the goal.
I wasn’t going to write about Martin Luther King, Jr.
However, I heard President Donald Trump declared in his speech today: “I will end the government policy of trying to socially engineer race and gender into everyday life. We will forge a society that is colorblind & merit based.”
🧵
With these words, he spoke what many of us — Thomas Sowell, Shelby Steele to the man on the street — have fought for since the 1960s. Trump’s plain words echoed King’s timeless quote that man should “not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”
The fact that Trump echoed King was bittersweet. It revealed how profoundly we Americans have betrayed King’s Dream since the 1960s.
I’ve long been a Laker fan. That is why when I saw ESPN’s Celtics/Lakers: The Best of Enemies, I had to watch. It goes into depth about Magic & Bird, including the racial controversies.
I was half way through when I saw the latest racial controversy surrounding WNBA's @CaitlinClark22.
🧵
An All-American in high school, she rose to national prominence after leading Iowa University to two consecutive NCAA championship games — the last one taking place this past March. She then went straight into the WNBA after being selected first overall by the Indiana Fever in the draft. She set multiple records, made the WNBA All-Star team, and won the rookie-of-the-year award as well as a spot on the All-WNBA First Team.
Time Magazine chose to honor her with its “Athlete of the Year” award. What made this announcement on X controversial was that Clark said as a white woman she has privilege.
Have we yet achieved an America in which race cannot suspend the law?
My thoughts along with those of my father, Shelby Steele, who has seen this kind of travesty play out many times in America history.
Long 🧵:
I know some of you may be following the trial of Daniel Penny in New York City. For those of you who don’t know, Penny is a Marine veteran who was 24 years old at the time he allegedly choked Jordan Neely, a subway platform performer, to death.
In an interview, Penny recounted that Neely entered the train while saying, "I'm gonna kill everybody. I could go to prison forever, I don't care." He repeated this several times, including that he would “kill a motherfucker.”