Supreme Court resumes hearing the cash-for-jobs scam case involving ex-TN minister Senthil Balaji.
Bench: Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi
#SupremeCourt #SenthilBalaji #cashforjobscam
On the last hearing the Court had pulled up the State government for naming more than 2000 individuals as accused remarking that a “cricket stadium” would be required to conduct trial.
Sr. Adv. Kapil Sibal (for Balaji): these are 3 applications.
Justice Kant: after 2 years you’re filing applications.
Sibal: without notice they have filed counters in 25.2. All that I want is in the first application the matter may be decided by the trial court without being influenced by the observations. I want a caveat. That’s all I want.
Justice Kant: where were the observations made?
Sibal: the observations were made in Senthil Balaji vs. Y Balaji.
Order: we have heard Ld. Sr. Counsel. various prayers have been made in these Misc. applications. Mr. Sibal restricts his prayer only to clarify that the observations made in the judgements shall have no bearing in the pending trials. The MAs are disposed off with the clarification that the observations shall have no bearing on the pending trials.
Court now hears the case of Y Balaji(one of the victims in the cash for jobs scam):
Sr. Adv. Gopal Sankarnarayanan: this is the case where the appointment of a special prosecutor is pending. We had suggested a list of names. The SLP is item 26. And the MA is item 37. MA deals with the appointment of SPP. 26 is the SLP where there were thousands of accused. Your lordships had asked for a chart. It’s where the HC had said they will not interfere in the order of clubbing. They’ve given the names. We’ve updated our list based on that. There’s a list of main accused in CC No. 24. The main accused are the erstwhile transport minister, his brother and their confidants. There are total 2202 accused.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Delhi High Court refused to entertain a public interest litigation (PIL) concerning illegal construction in a village on the border of Delhi and Haryana.
Counsel for petitioner - In the area of the village, they are running cafes, banquet halls. The entire area is affected. The road is used for commute. A marriage procession causes traffic.
Chief Justice - Whether construction of these banquet halls are banned by law?
Supreme Court hears plea by the Governor of Kerala in his capacity as Chancellor of APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, challenging a High Court ruling which upheld the State government’s authority to recommend temporary VCs.
Bench: Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan
A fresh application has been filed by the State of Kerala challenging an earlier notification by the Governor (Chancellor) that had re-appointed Dr. K Sivaprasad as a temporary VC of the University.
AG R Venkataramani: the governer has issued an order entirely in terms of the Court’s orders. Their request is that an interim VC can be appointed unless we give a recommendation to the chancellor don’t pick up the interim VC.
Delhi Government tells the Delhi High Court that nine jail officials have been suspended over allegations of inmates and jail authorities running an extortion racket at Tihar Jail.
The Bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela today heard the matter.
Chief Justice - Pursuant to our order, an application has been moved by Principal Secretary, GNCTD seeking a week’s time to comply with earlier directions.
Supreme Court hears suo motu case on deforestation in Hyderabad’s Kancha Gachibowli area, over felling of trees near University of Hyderabad.
Bench: Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran.
In the last hearing, court observed that while sustainable development is important, it does not mean that forests can be destroyed overnight with bulldozers.
The Court had earlier warned the Telangana government of stern action if it fails to take steps to restore the lost forest cover.
Supreme Court hears ED plea challenging bail granted to Nagpur-based trader Wasim Bawla for his alleged involvement in the smuggling of foreign-origin betel nuts through the India-Myanmar border.
Bench: Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandan.
Order: Learned counsel submitted that the learned judge of the High Court erred in granting bail in such serious offence.
Order: The learned judge, by an elaborate order, found the petitioner entitled to bail. While granting bail, the judge observed that the principal accused was at liberty and, as such, the petitioner could not be denied bail.
Supreme Court to shortly hear petitions raising objections to the SIR exercise ahead of the upcoming assembly elections in Bihar #BiharSIR2025 #BiharElections @ECISVEEP #SupremeCourt
Bihar voter list revision: ECI tells Supreme Court no deletion without prior notice, hearing
An affidavit by ECI stated these safeguards are further reinforced by a robust two-tier appeal mechanism ensuring that every elector has adequate recourse against any adverse action.