🧵FRANKLY, yesterday’s woman, the former FM who left office in a miasma of her own (and her hubby’s) making is getting far too much attention. But there is some revisionism that is just too egregious to ignore. Especially as she has a platform denied to us.
If Sturgeon really thinks Oct 22 was the point the debate became “toxic” & hope of “common ground” disappeared, we wonder if she was drunk or in a coma for half a decade? Otherwise how to account for such wilful blindness? thetimes.com/article/291601…
Clearly, the shirt hit a nerve, “it seems blindingly obvious that a stunt like that was never going to elevate the debate or illuminate the issues at the heart of it.” But Sturgeon wasn’t interested in debate. Her zealotry made Thatcher’s commitment to the Poll Tax look measured.
She has disappeared into a hubristic fantasy of her own inviolability and righteousness which is as ridiculous as it is insulting. Worry not, we have the receipts!
Late 22 saw last ditch attempts by campaigners, after years of vilification, to have concerns taken seriously before the Bill came to Parl. Our huge event was supported by many former & current MSPs with a typically passionate speech by @JohannLamont forwomen.scot/08/10/2022/wom…
It didn’t come out of nowhere. In Sep 19, Sturgeon said at the UN that women’s concerns were “misplaced”. We wrote, asking her for a meeting. Naturally, she wouldn't give us the time of day.
When she refused, we asked Shirley Ann Somerville - several times - she also refused. We also asked if they would consider attempting to ensure a respectful discussion and avoid the issues that marred previous meetings. forwomen.scot/17/09/2019/con…
Sturgeon now claims that she didn’t think @jk_rowling would be up for debating her. We were, but perhaps we weren't high profile enough. Were campaigners like FWS, members of her own NEC & her own parliamentarians (like @AshReganMSP), below her touch?
@CallieMac009 wrote an account of Sturgeon's stewardship of the SNP in WWWW. She recalls a letter written in 2020 which she “naively” thought the leader would not ignore. Later, she realised that “naked intimidation” was not just tolerated but encouraged.
The previous meeting we referred to in our letter was in Jan 2019. We wrote about it here:
Protesters outside the venue included “Cathy” who said that we should be “made afraid & silenced by force”. For us, it seemed quite toxic then!
Yet, this was small beer compared to the event at Edinburgh University later that year. Speakers said they had never encountered such security which was more akin to that in place for visiting heads of state. Claire Heuchan recalls (in WWWW) the anxiety made her physically sick.
Of course, the lovely “Cathy” popped up & assaulted @bindelj. Another large man who had threatened to “throat punch” FWS was outside protesting. Sturgeon is upset she was called “destroyer of women’s rights” in 2022. We were worried about being killed.
In Sep 2021 we had a protest at Parliament. Our chants were so loud that they were heard in the chamber during FMQs. It was covered extensively in the press, but perhaps Ms Sturgeon didn’t read the papers. forwomen.scot/04/09/2021/wom…
She was certainly made aware of it by @murdo_fraser who said that he had gone out to the protest and met women concerned about GRR. Sturgeon started shouting either “shame on you” or “shame on them” (it’s contested) at him.
Some of her closest allies then began to spread malicious smears about the demo. Mhairi Hunter, her former campaign manager, took to Twitter to claim that a fascist group had announced their intention to attend our protest in support. Of course, it was wholly without foundation.
Even after she was shown evidence to disprove it, she refused to retract. And other, large follower accounts joined in.
What does Sturgeon think this did to our fears for our safety or to our mental health?
Karen Adam, later to sit on the committee examining GRR, jumped on the bandwagon to make the protest all about her and paint the women as feral monsters.
Let's not forget that Sturgeon happily jumped into bed with Patrick Harvie despite the toxic & intemperate language he used about fellow MSPs - not least, @JoanMcAlpine & @JohannLamont
We don't discount the possibility that Sturgeon got threats - it would, sadly, be unusual if she didn’t. But we would have more sympathy had she ever attempted to deal with the situation in the SNP and the appalling targeting of @joannaccherry news.sky.com/story/snp-accu…
It was happening under her nose. So either she was lumpenly unintelligent and unaware (so much for the famed emotional intelligence!), she didn’t care, or she saw and approved.
She makes large claims about her commitment to women’s rights. But Sturgeon has never done much for women - especially those she worked with. Her "feminism" is largely centered on herself.
Sturgeon repeats her risible claim that we are “standing alongside” Trump, Putin & Orbán. This is the juvenile argument we call "vegetarians are all Hitler”. I imagine she stands with them on gravity. Unless she thinks we are bobbing along hitting our heads off the rainbow.
Naturally, she can’t resist more underhanded attempts to attack women’s rights activists:
“The tactics deployed by some, however sincere their views might have been, suggested there was another agenda at work.”
What tactics? What agenda? Spell it out!
Sturgeon is touring the radio stations, she has a book, publicity, and a huge advance. She is not the David in this fight. If anyone would like the full FWS version, we are more than open to bashing out a book for a lot less. It will also be far more entertaining!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The most concerning thing about the nonsense spouted about bone marrow transplants & chromosomal conditions yesterday was wondering how this would land with the panel.
Rare conditions are, sadly, too often weaponised (I fear "our" side is also guilty), so a đź§µ
First of all, fun fact! Male DNA may be observable in women who have borne male children. This may persist for decades.
Similarly, following a transplant on male subjects, the Y chromosome may be absent in *some* cells, this does not alter genetic sex as determined by the original sex chromosomes.
Even if Dr Upton had a full stem cell transplant, he wouldn't change sex!
Absolutely extraordinary scenes today in @ScotParl in which it emerged that MSPs and staff are confused about how to use the lavatory - something many nursery children manage without such tortuous introspection.
Let's dive in! đź§µ
There are many issues which may be considered "urgent" in Scotland today, but Patrick Harvie wanted a debate on toilets & the bonkers "open letter" from the fox-batterer and confused chums.
Remember, #HarvieHatesWomen.
@CGrahameMSP heroically tries to make the rational case for providing provisions for everyone according to law, protecting all the PCs, and not discriminating. Sounds good?
(Pat's colleague, @MaggieChapman was at the meeting when they signed off the decision - he could ask her?)
So, what to say about the inane interview from Sacha Deshmukh of @AmnestyUK on @BBCWomansHour?
Firstly, of course, this was an embarrassment for the @bbc, for @itsanitarani, and for the "human rights" charity none of whom, seemingly, were on top of basic facts.
Sacha confidently asserted that everyone else was reading the judgment - ALL 30 PAGES - wrong. He seemed mighty pleased that it was 30 pages (he mentioned it 3 times).
The problem? It is 88 pages, suggesting Sacha either read 1/3 of it or was misdirected by a minion.
Either way, we can be pretty confident that Sacha has not actually engaged with the text at all. More concerning for @BBCWomansHour, their presenter was not across the simplest detail.
đź§µStatement: We cannot see why the Supreme Court ruling should have made any difference to the introduction of the long delayed Misogyny Bill, unless, of course, the Bill also sought to redefine women and to include trans identified men (already protected under HCA).
We are pleased @scotgov has finally decided to protect women & girls under hate crime legislation as Lord Bracadale originally suggested back in 2018. A proposal which we and @mbmpolicy backed in our submissions to the committee. forwomen.scot/wp-content/upl…
We remain frustrated - & angry - it has taken so long to get to this point. In 2003 Robin Harper MSP lodged an amendment to the Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 2003 to make provision for offences aggravated by disability, sexual orientation, age & gender. forwomen.scot/24/11/2020/his…
“I don’t think we will be seeing hide nor hair of it again,” one nationalist backbencher said. “How can we legislate to criminalise misogyny when we can’t even agree what a woman is?" thetimes.com/uk/scotland/ar…
For Women Scotland, which brought the Supreme Court case cited by the government as the reason for the delay, claimed the SNP was making “dishonest and offensive” excuses not to act.
“This only goes to show, once again, that women are not a priority for this government,” said Marion Calder, a director at the campaign group.
He also thought Sussex Uni - who were just served with a record fine for failing to uphold free speech - should apologise because they didn't sack @Docstockk but just waited for the thugs to drive her out.
@Docstockk He even wrote a revolting article saying that unions should support the sacking of staff if they were evil w̶i̶t̶c̶h̶e̶s̶ um, terven.
His claim that he would have backed anyone complaining about Monty's talk rings a tad hollow! archive.ph/2iYg9