FBI Memos Expose Schiff’s ‘Smoking Gun’ Leak Plot — Was DC’s Crime Crackdown the Cover Story? 🧵
1/12
Newly declassified FBI 302s show that in 2017, Adam Schiff allegedly ordered staff to leak classified intel with one goal: “indict the president.”
2/12
The whistleblower? A Democrat intel analyst on the House Intel Committee — not MAGA Twitter — who told the FBI Schiff gave the green light in front of staff.
3/12
Schiff allegedly reassured them the speech-and-debate clause would protect them from prosecution.
4/12
Details from the whistleblower:
- Schiff picked which docs to leak
- Eric Swalwell suspected of leaking too
- Staff said they “would not be caught”
- Sensitive docs hit the press verbatim in days
5/12
The DOJ? Claimed immunity.
The FBI? Didn’t dispute the story — just cited Schiff’s privilege.
6/12
Kash Patel has now dropped these memos into Congress’s lap.
The timing? Couldn’t be more interesting.
7/12
Because right now, Trump has DC law enforcement under direct federal control — 800 National Guard, FBI, DEA, ATF, U.S. Marshals, Park Police.
8/12
The stated reason: “crime crackdown.”
The possible real reason: locking DC down before a high-profile arrest that could light the city on fire.
9/12
If you were planning that, you wouldn’t wait for the mob to gather — you’d flood the zone first, control the perimeter, and choke off protests before they start.
10/12
Maybe the “crime” line is just the cover story.
Maybe the real story is coming.
11/12
A declassified FBI memo just shattered the Clinton protection racket wide open.
It details how Obama’s DOJ smothered the Clinton Foundation investigation — while the same people were launching a bogus case against Trump.
You ready for this? Let’s go: 🧵
1/16
In 2016, the FBI had 3 field offices — Little Rock, NY, and DC — investigating the Clinton Foundation for a pay-to-play corruption scheme.
The evidence?
Millions in foreign donations flowing in…
While Hillary handed out favors as Secretary of State.
2/16
What did Obama’s DOJ do with that evidence?
They shut it down.
Literally.
“Shut it down!” — Deputy AG Sally Yates, to prosecutors trying to pursue the case.
Trump just fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. At first it looked like he was mad over a weak July jobs report.
But the deeper you go, the more it starts to look like the cleanest firing of the year. Here’s why 🧵
1/13
Start with the numbers:
- July: only 73,000 jobs added
- Massive downward revision of -258,000
- Earlier in 2025: 2024 jobs overstated by 598,000
- Preliminary revision had it at 818,000 fewer jobs than reported
That’s not a rounding error.
2/13
Translation: Biden’s 2024 campaign was built on fake job growth. And the BLS — either by incompetence or something else — handed him the talking points.
Trump flagged it back in August 2024. No one listened. Then he got receipts.
3/13
This is a real congressional district.
Maryland’s 3rd — drawn by Democrats to guarantee a seat.
Nicknamed the “praying mantis.”
They call it democracy.
We call it what it is: rigged.👇
📸 (Yes, this is real.)
1/13
For decades, Democrats have gerrymandered their way into power.
Maryland. Illinois. New York.
Maps so twisted they make Picasso look sober.
Now Texas redraws a map — and the media calls it “fascism.”
Because this time, it works.
2/13
Maryland’s partisan shift:
- Mid-1980s: 4 Dem – 4 GOP
- 1990s: 5 Dem – 3 GOP
- 2000s: 6 Dem – 2 GOP
- Since 2012: 7 Dem – 1 GOP
Meanwhile, GOP vote share hovers around 35–40%.
This isn’t organic. It’s engineered.
3/13
August 1 was Trump’s final deadline: comply with reciprocal tariffs or get slapped. Japan, the EU, and others folded. No trade war. No recession. No economic collapse. Just winning. 🧵
1/11
Remember the predictions?
“Markets will crash.”
“Inflation will explode.”
“Trade partners will retaliate.”
None of that happened.
-Markets hit all-time highs
- Inflation cooled
- Unemployment held steady
- Retaliation = ZERO
2/11
The Center for Strategic and International Studies laid out Trump’s structure:
- Flat, consistent tariffs
- Strategic protections (steel, aluminum)
- No demand for reciprocal tariffs—just investment
- No partner retaliation
3/11