Thread by @saianuragdas

In 2014, the BJP secured a historic mandate, and Narendra Modi, with his charismatic leadership and vision for development, rose to the office of the Prime Minister of India. His government introduced transformative reforms across the nation.

Yet, the entrenched Leftist–Communist–Congress cabal dismissed his victory, claiming it was merely the result of anti-incumbency against Congress and the corruption scandals of UPA-I and UPA-II.

Time moved forward, and as 2019 approached, skepticism grew. Many—even within my own family—believed Modi would not return as Prime Minister, repeating the old cliché that “Indians always crave something new.” But history proved them wrong.

In 2019, Modi returned to power with an even larger mandate—BJP alone winning 303 seats—cementing his dominance in Indian politics.
However, a clear shift occurred after 2019.

Before, the Left–Liberal gangs would indulge in award-wapsi dramas and propagate the narrative that “India is unsafe for minorities” and “India is becoming intolerant.” After Modi’s second victory, their tactics escalated into daily protests and orchestrated unrest.

The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) was the first major flashpoint. India witnessed some of the deadliest communal riots in decades. Radical Muslim mobs, backed by Leftist–Congress elements, unleashed chaos across the country.

Delhi burned. The infamous Shaheen Bagh-style occupation emerged, supported by foreign-funded NGOs, opposition parties, and illegal Bangladeshi and Pakistani migrants—alongside Indian Muslim radicals—whose sole objective was to choke Delhi.

The situation persisted until, post-COVID and after the Delhi Assembly elections, Arvind Kejriwal—having politically benefited from the unrest—urged the Centre to dismantle the blockade.

Next came the so-called Farmers’ Protest. In reality, it was less about farmers and more about Khalistani terror networks, with political operatives determined to besiege Delhi once again. The protest culminated in the humiliation of Republic Day 2021,

when Khalistani extremists stormed the Red Fort and hoisted their separatist flag. Yet PM Modi, showing restraint, stayed silent. Later, in a controversial move, he repealed the three farm laws and sought forgiveness from the nation.

The COVID-19 pandemic revealed another sinister facet of these networks. Political actors, NGOs, and opportunistic leaders allegedly created artificial shortages of oxygen, allowing citizens to die in agony—

manufacturing an image of governmental failure to provoke nationwide chaos and an incipient civil-war-like situation. India nevertheless overcame the crisis.

In the run-up to the 2024 General Election, the country endured thousands of protests. Narratives of “incoming dictatorship” flooded the media. Rumors spread that BJP would rewrite the Constitution, abolish reservations, and dismantle the democratic framework.

Social media silenced Hindu voices and nationalist opinions. Disinformation, linguistic conflicts, anti-Hindi campaigns, caste violence, separatist Dravida Nadu rhetoric, Naxal attacks, drug smuggling, the Manipur crisis—India was in constant turmoil.

When the results came, PM Modi had won a third term, but BJP’s tally had dropped sharply from 303 to 240 seats. Rumors swirled that Kerala’s churches were threatened, pressuring Chandrababu Naidu to pull TDP out of the NDA.

Others whispered that Nitish Kumar was offered the Prime Minister’s post with the INDI Alliance’s backing. Still, Modi prevailed, taking the oath once again.

But the moment he assumed office, the destabilization began. Tourist buses were attacked by terrorists. Trains began derailing daily—police discovered gas cylinders, boulders, and other sabotage equipment on the tracks.

A coordinated social media and media disinformation campaign ran in parallel.Yet, once the NIA took over, derailments abruptly stopped—along with the propaganda.
From June 2024 to August 2025, protests continued, but BJP regained momentum, winning Haryana,

Maharashtra, and Delhi in succession. Then, in April 2025, Pakistani terrorists attacked Pahalgam, selecting Hindu victims and instructing women to “tell PM Modi we killed your men.”

In May 2025, India retaliated with Operation Sindoor—a devastating military strike that obliterated multiple Pakistani terrorist camps, airbases, nuclear facilities, and even shot down Pakistani F-16s and Chinese fighter jets integrated into Pakistan’s Air Force.

After Operation Sindoor, U.S. displeasure was unmistakable. Donald Trump began loudly claiming—over 35 times—that he had personally brokered the ceasefire. PM Modi publicly refuted this in Parliament. In retaliation,U.S. imposed a 50% tariff on India, citing Russian oil imports.

Then came political shockwaves: Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar abruptly resigned. Reports emerged that he had been attempting to destabilize the government, lobbying Chandrababu Naidu to pull out of the NDA, and even plotting a coup to replace Modi.

When the PM learned of this, he allegedly threatened to impeach Dhankhar unless he resigned immediately.Recently, PM Modi stated in an interview that he is prepared to face personal losses but will not compromise on protecting Indian farmers’ rights,

refusing to sign the U.S. trade deal. This raises urgent questions:

What exactly was Modi’s “personal loss”?

What truly happened during Operation Sindoor?

Did the Indian Army destroy American assets inside Pakistan?

Now, new storms are brewing. The Election Commission is under attack, accused of “vote theft” during the general elections. The EC’s ongoing SIR process—purging bogus and illegal Bangladeshi voters—has enraged opposition parties dependent on demographic manipulation.