Students For Liberty Profile picture
Aug 12, 2025 12 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Ludwig von Mises warned us 80 years ago: when governments start making individual "deals" with private companies, we're witnessing the transformation from capitalism to something far more dangerous.

The news about Nvidia and AMD giving the U.S. government 15% of chip sales to China? Mises saw this exact pattern coming. 🧵Image
In "Omnipotent Government," Mises identified a dangerous transformation he called "etatism."

Think of it this way: You still "own" your business on paper, but the government tells you what to make, who to hire, what prices to charge, and who you can sell to. You're a manager, not an owner.Image
Mises wrote: "The entrepreneur in a capitalist society depends upon the market and upon the consumers. Every entrepreneur must daily justify his social function through subservience to the wants of the consumers."

But when business success requires political deals, everything changes.Image
The pattern is accelerating across recent months:

— Apple announced $600B U.S. investment after iPhone tariff threats

— Intel's CEO visiting the White House after public criticism

— Nvidia/AMD now paying 15% revenue cuts for China market access

This isn't capitalism. It's what Mises called "etatism."Image
Mises warned that under etatism, "the government, not the consumers, directs production."

When companies must seek political permission rather than consumer approval, we've crossed a dangerous line. Success becomes about relationships with power, not service to people. Image
So what's the big deal about these corporate negotiations? Mises saw where this leads.

When Nvidia pays 15% to access China markets, they're not responding to consumer demand. They're buying political permission. This fundamentally changes how businesses operate.Image
Instead of competing on price, quality, and innovation, companies now compete on political connections. Resources shift from R&D and customer service to lobbying and government relations.

The best politically connected firms win, not the most efficient ones.Image
Here's the terrifying part: even if current leaders have good intentions, they're building the infrastructure of control.

Once government has the power to grant or deny market access through individual deals, that power doesn't disappear when leadership changes. Image
Future authoritarians won't need to seize control—they'll inherit a system where economic power already flows through political channels.

Small businesses can't negotiate these deals. They face full regulations while big corporations get special arrangements. Perfect tools for political control.
Mises understood this doesn't happen in one election cycle. It's a slow infection of ideas that spreads across decades until everyone accepts that companies should negotiate with whoever holds power.

Eventually, people forget that businesses once served consumers, not politicians.Image
Mises understood that ideas have consequences. Bad economic ideas don't just create poverty—they destroy the institutional foundations of free society.

The battle for freedom starts in the classroom, not the boardroom.Image
🚨 FINAL WEEK TO APPLY

Want to learn how to recognize and fight these patterns? Students For Liberty trains liberty leaders who understand what Mises saw coming.

Don't just watch it happen. Learn to stop it. Applications close August 16th for our 2025-26 US/Canada program.

Apply now:

Final week. Apply today.join.studentsforliberty.orgImage

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Students For Liberty

Students For Liberty Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sfliberty

Feb 7
Boston, 1860: Anti-slavery activists are attacked at a public meeting for speaking against popular opinion.

Instead of arresting the mob, Boston officials arrested the speakers.

Free speech was buried in the "Cradle of Liberty" for "public safety".

Frederick Douglass's response became the ultimate defense of free speech. 🧵Image
Boston, the "Cradle of Liberty", where American independence was born.

Abolitionists gathered at Tremont Temple to honor John Brown, executed one year earlier for his raid on Harpers Ferry.

Pro-slavery mobs stormed the meeting. Fists flew. Speakers were dragged from the stage.

Boston's mayor refused to protect the abolitionists. Instead, officials shut it down "to preserve order."Image
Weeks later, Frederick Douglass sat down and wrote something that cut straight to the mechanism.

His "Plea for Freedom of Speech in Boston" didn't just defend the abolitionists.

It exposed the institutional logic that makes censorship inevitable when authorities value "order" over rights.Image
Read 9 tweets
Feb 4
Ronald Coase set out to prove that Socialism was superior to the chaos of the market.

So he went to America to see how giant industries were actually managed.

What he found destroyed his worldview. And won him a Nobel Prize.

This is the story of how a young socialist became one of the most important economists of the 20th century by following evidence over ideology. 🧵Image
London, 1929. A 19-year-old economics student at LSE calls himself a "soft socialist."

The intellectual consensus seemed obvious: markets were chaos, central planning was science.

His professors had a compelling argument: businesses are already mini-planned economies. If planning works inside firms, why not scale it to entire nations?Image
For young Coase, the logic felt inevitable. Scientific management promised order. The invisible hand looked like randomness.

But in 1931, he won a scholarship that would change everything: a chance to study American industry firsthand.

He went expecting to document techniques for improving socialist planning. He found something that shattered his worldview instead.Image
Read 14 tweets
Jan 15
Frédéric Bastiat had 6 years to change economics forever.

Most economists spend decades writing papers five people read. Bastiat was an unknown farmer with tuberculosis.

By the time he died, he'd built a movement that's still winning arguments 175 years later.

You have four years of college. 🧵Image
Here's what most students tell themselves:

"I need more credentials first."
"I need the right connections."
"I need the perfect moment to start."

Bastiat had none of these when he began in 1844.

He had a failing farm, terminal illness, and six years left to live.

He didn't wait for permission.Image
Let me show you what's possible when you stop waiting.

1844: Unknown farmer in rural France. No academic position. No political connections. Just ideas he needed the world to hear.

1846: Leading the French Free Trade Association, corresponding with major British economists.

1848: Elected to French Parliament.Image
Read 9 tweets
Jan 7
Everyone Wants Democratic Transition for Venezuela

But how do you restore democracy in a kleptocratic state captured by criminal elites?

To understand the problem, you need to understand how Venezuela got here. This story is a stark reminder that freedom isn't lost overnight, but slowly dismantled, one piece at a time. 🧵Image
The Liberation Myth: Venezuela Started With a Promise

In 1811, Simon Bolivar liberated Venezuela from Spanish rule. He dreamed of a unified, free South America built on republican ideals.

But Bolivar's revolution created a nation, not stability. What followed was a century of chaos.Image
A Century of Strongmen: The 19th Century Belonged to Caudillos

After independence came civil wars, military coups, and regional warlords fighting for control. Venezuela cycled through dozens of governments.

Power didn't come from elections. It came from controlling enough armed men to take Caracas. Whoever seized the capital claimed to speak for the nation.

Democracy was a promise constantly deferred.Image
Read 24 tweets
Jan 5
“I'm against Maduro, but I think what Trump did was wrong.”

This sentence sounds reasonable, balanced, and mature. The kind of thing a serious person would say to avoid seeming radical.

The problem is that this sentence is, morally, one of the worst possible positions on Venezuela. 🧵Image
Not because it's moderate. But because it's a conscious escape. That "but" isn't prudence. It's a silent plea for moral exoneration.

The attempt to appear sophisticated while avoiding the thing that morality often demands: to hierarchize evil. To say what is worse. To choose. Image
Let's be clear about what we're "balancing" here.

Under Maduro's "socialism of the 21st century," Venezuela collapsed into hyperinflation exceeding 1,000,000%. Systematic scarcity created mass starvation. Venezuelans resorted to eating dogs and scavenging trash to survive.

These aren't political talking points. These are documented atrocities.Image
Read 12 tweets
Dec 21, 2025
They predicted the Great Depression. Then the 2008 crash. Then 2020's inflation surge.

A group of economists spent 150 years warning about the same pattern.

Nobody in power listened.

And every time, they were proven right.

This is the story of the Austrian School. 🧵 Image
Modern economics had a fatal flaw.

For decades, mainstream economists treated the economy like a machine. Pull this lever, push that button, adjust interest rates here; boom, everything works perfectly.

But economies aren't machines. They're millions of people making billions of decisions every single day.

You can't predict human action with mathematical precision. The Austrian School understood this from day one.Image
It started in Vienna in 1871 when Carl Menger published Principles of Economics and asked a deceptively simple question: Why do people value things?

His answer shattered centuries of economic thinking.

Value isn't objective. It's subjective, based on individual human needs and desires.
Not labor hours. Not production costs. Human preferences.Image
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(