A note on @FootballAUS governance and reports of yet another "strategic plan".
@joeylynchy Much commentary prompted by this, reports of other departures, @wufcofficial being be'league'ered, FA debt, @aleaguemen debt, restructure, worldwide CEO search...
Since March 2017 only - no point dredging further - when AAFC was formed, we've had, at least
- the Whole of Football Plan
- the XI Principles
- the Starting XI (remember them?)
- One Football Strategy
And now we're developing a new strategic plan. Ofcourse we are...
Steven Lowy was FFA Chairman and David Gallop was CEO. AAFC attended the FFA governance convention overseen by FIFA in late 2017. It was a sad spectacle. Rome was burning but the AL was intent on a greater share of the ashes (Foxsports money, about to disappear) and got them...
A new FA (now) - nothing like a rebrand to start afresh and signal intent - was established in 2018 and the new board swept in, led by Chris Nikou as the peace offering, compromise candidate who was on the FFA board, new CEO, James Johnson, and a revamped executive...
So, since 2017, in my capacity at AAFC, advocating for the reform of our untenable national 2nd tier, the NPL, I've dealt with FA Chairs
- Steven Lowy
- Chris Nikou
- Anter Isaac
Many board members, but most relevantly, Remo Nogarotto, Joseph Carozzi. Many haven't left a trace..
CEOs and executive team
- David Gallop
- James Johnson
- Jo Setright (legal)
- Tim Holden (legal)
- Emma Highwood (NST, women)
- Mark Falvo
- Mel Mallam (legal)
- Natalie Lutz (licensing, NST)
- Peter Filopoulos
- Alex Davani
- Sarah Walsh
- Tom Rischbieth
- Robbie Middleby
The private AL teams, collectively, were given effective control of FA Congress via their combined percentage vote, rights over the Women's Council vote and relationship with the PFA and then UNBUNDLED, given 85% of the competition, free, and effective control of FA, via the APL!
This 'brilliant' move resulted in our already inflexible top tier due to private ownership of all teams with no provision for pro/rel, controlled by owners who wanted to 'protect their investment' and who, by law, had to place shareholder interest above the interest of our game..
...not only resisting change within its ranks, but affecting and influencing change and the development of all aspects of our game through effective control of FA. It sold a third of our top tier we gave it for about $140M, and after giving 5% to FA, reducing FA interest to 10%..
... promptly squandered it all, by all reports. It was its money after all. We gave it to them. Simply brilliant. Gave away about $130M and control of our governing body to a disparate set of private owners and a US opaque equity fund, Silverlake, legally required to...
...put themselves first. I forgot to include in my list above the AL heads
- Greg Griffin
- Danny Townsend
- More
In 8.5 years, we've changed direction more times than Messi evading 6 defenders, but without the purpose and execution.
Our current FA Chairman, Anter Isaac,..
..., appointed by FA in 2022 to develop the NST, left that role midstream to jump onto the FA Board and effectively straight to Chairman. Incredible moves aren't confined to the pitch. In his new role, he passionately advocated a different NST comp model to the one he developed.
...Who will be our new cast? What will be our new 'strategic plan'? How will we re-invent the wheel? Burn money? Develop a national way to play?
Unless we revert to merit as our guiding principle for Competitions and to clubs as our primary vehicles, this vortex will continue.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A frustrated lament. Angst-riddled comments. Said it before, but 1. The AL model was too expensive from the start. 2. AL owners met annual shortfalls which resulted in massive accumulated losses. Commensurate grievances followed, directed mostly at FFA.2gb.com/podcast/mark-b…
3. The AL teams started a FFA Congress fight for more of the oversold Foxsports broadcast money. 4. At the same time, they wanted to leave home because they were all grown up, knew it all and could do better than mum & dad. They were teenagers now, about 14. 5. They didn't know..
..their problems were inherent and inherited. Part of their DNA. 6. They got more say in FA Congress and were set free. 7. A new private, for-profit company. was set up to house them in their freedom - the APL. They are it's shareholders - they own their house. Built on our land.
1. Europeans turned up to a faraway land. 2. They brought their cultures, formed communities, slowly merged and amalgamated with each other although, tragically, not so well with the first inhabitants. 3. For many, football was a common denominator.
4. The new communities formed football clubs. These also served as cultural centres. They gave solace support and connection to migrants. 5. Among myriad wonderful achievements, a famous son was spawned. So famous, he achieved the ultimate distinction - known by one name - Ange.
6. These clubs were mainly founded by single ethnicities, demonstrating our tolerance & multiculturalism. Their success - the product of the ambition, aspiration and pride of these communities. In time, they merged with the wider community. Proud, authentic Australian clubs, all.
With all these summaries, time for a summary. 1. No, we've never had a NSD, as such, but pre AL we also never had a closed, private, exclusive top-tier, running itself, for itself and for private profit. 2. The new NST might be the dream of many but..
it's been made possible by clubs below the AL. By their successful advocacy through AAFC and now by the simple fact they propose to stump up the cash to pay for it. The FA isn't paying for it and said it will do it if & because the clubs are paying. Ambition for unity is good...
doing unity and making it possible is indispensable. 3. This follows the debilitating effect of the NPL on the viability, survival and growth of the clubs we are now depending on to grow our game & for the unprecedented excitement in our domestic game for at least 15 years.
1. It highlights that MV (and all AL teams) are not clubs and they don't have members. They are companies and they have season ticket holders. 2. Fan groups such as OSM form to seek influence in what they consider their club... theage.com.au/sport/soccer/r…
3. ...which isn't. Fans who care are now realising they can care all they want but they have no say. They are not members. It is not their club. It wasn't formed by and from the community. Following many recent APL and AL team decisions, suddenly, this matters to fans who care.
4. To be fair, it's a worldwide issue now at top level. So fan groups are forming everywhere and seeking representation at FIFA and national fed level. One tried with FA. This is only necessary now that fans can't run their clubs. So 'they' try to have a say in running the game.
I'm reading of overwhelming anguish among our ⚽️ journos, writers and many fans following the shocking behaviour of the derelict drongos at MV v MC. Despairing, yes. Because of the injury to Tom Glover and others, the abandonment of the match and because it was terrible. But
...not because it has set our game back years, forever, or whatever. Not because we have somehow wasted the 'opportunity' given to us by the Socceroos by their performance at the WC. Shocking behaviour by criminals aside, (they can't learn anyway), what we fail to learn is that
the success of our professional game isn't dependent on or influenced by our Socceroos. We had a great run in 2006 too. Say we'd beaten Italy and got past Ukraine to the semis? Do we really think the AL would be different? We need to look after our domestic game at every level on