Brigitte Macron is in the headlines after Candace Owens accused the French First Lady of being a man, and the Macrons filed a 22-count defamation lawsuit in response. Might be true, might not. But there's a far more interesting story here: her husband's rise to power.
🧵 THREAD
The term "Manchurian Candidate" conjures images of spy thrillers, of men who are brainwashed and programmed to act against their own nations. It's Hollywood fantasy. Or is it? Because when you examine Emmanuel Macron, his sudden, improbable ascent from obscurity to the Élysée Palace starts to feel less fictional.
No sci-fi brainwashing. No flashing lights or hypnotic spirals. Just careful grooming. Silent backers. Loyalties shaped long before the public ever knew his name. A mediocre man who gets slapped around by his domineering wife is now one of the most powerful people in the world.
Germany may be Europe's economic engine, but France has always been its crown jewel: the political, military, and cultural heart of the continent. Control France, and you control not just markets, but minds, traditions, and the future of Europe itself.
Which makes the rise of Macron all the more disturbing. How, one wonders, did a provincial banker, virtually unknown to the French public a decade ago, climb so quickly to the highest office in the land? The truth is, he didn't climb. He was carried.
Macron's Rothschild years reveal a man propelled by connections, not competence. Early colleagues recall that he didn't even know what EBITDA — earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization — meant. A fundamental term in corporate finance.
It's the equivalent of a mechanic not knowing what an ignition is. Yet Macron rose from basic spreadsheet tasks to partner in record time, thanks to elite backers and well-timed advantages, not technical mastery. From relatively obscure banker to the highest circles of European politics.
The rise was too fast, too clean, and far too suspect. Enter Jacques Attali. His name may not mean much to some readers, but this is someone who has influenced France's political class for decades. Now 81, he served as special adviser to President François Mitterrand.
Attali played a key role in mentoring François Hollande. Even now, he ranks among the most formidable behind-the-scenes operators in French politics. In the American context, his reach would put him in the company of Zbigniew Brzezinski and George Soros. Part strategist, part gatekeeper, part financier.
Attali once boasted that he "discovered" Macron, even claiming he "invented him." The Macron we see today — the carefully packaged politician, the unapologetic globalist, the made-for-television president — wasn't born. He was built. And he was built at remarkable speed.
At age 32, Macron's selection into the French-American Foundation's program placed him among future operatives aligned with U.S.-EU integrationist interests. The Foundation has long served as a quiet grooming ground for transatlantic elites.
Past participants in the French-American Foundation's Young Leaders program include figures like Bill and Hillary Clinton. Macron passed through other elite grooming institutions: Sciences Po and the École nationale d'administration (ENA).
Sciences Po, often referred to as the training ground for France's ruling class, has produced generations of presidents, prime ministers, and top civil servants. The ENA is even more exclusive. Founded after World War II, it was designed to produce the officials who would rebuild modern France.
ENA alumni include Hollande, Jacques Chirac, Valéry Giscard d'Estaing, and Mr. Macron. But then came Bilderberg, the real proving ground. Within months of attending in 2014, Macron's political career took off.
For the uninitiated, Bilderberg is a private, invitation-only gathering where the world's most powerful bankers, CEOs, generals, and politicians meet behind closed doors. Off the record, out of sight, and far from accountability.
It is where future leaders are sized up, tested, and quietly approved. At the 2014 meeting, Macron was placed directly before the men and women who would soon bankroll and promote his ascent. This wasn't a coincidence. It was, I suggest, a coronation.
In 2016, after becoming a World Economic Forum (WEF) Young Global Leader, Macron reached another "miraculous" milestone. He joined a carefully selected group approved by Klaus Schwab that included the likes of Justin Trudeau and Jacinda Ardern.
This was yet another clear signal, a public endorsement from the same global interests that had backed him from the start. Less than twelve months later, Macron stormed to the French presidency. Stunning achievement for a man with no real political base, no electoral track record.
His main rivals were systematically crippled by scandals, exposed and prosecuted with an efficiency rarely seen in a country where the legal machinery usually crawls. Meanwhile, a political vehicle — En Marche! — was assembled almost overnight.
Backed by deep-pocketed donors and coordinated by consultants and firms closely tied to France's corporate and financial elite. Macron didn't create a movement. A movement was created around him. There is nothing normal about Emmanuel Macron's rise.
Under his leadership, France has been pushed deeper into corporate control, subordinated to supranational institutions, and subjected to sweeping social experiments, often in open defiance of the will of the French people. He has governed not as a servant of the nation, but as an agent.
National industries have been stripped. Traditional institutions have been weakened. Public anger has hardened into revolt, visible everywhere from the Yellow Vests to the farmer protests that periodically paralyze parts of the country.
He has waged war on free speech and presided over mass immigration policies that have transformed the demographics of major cities. Expansion of digital surveillance that now rivals anything seen in authoritarian states. Vaccine mandates with open contempt for dissenters.
He boasted that his government would make life "miserable" for the unvaccinated. At the same time, Macron has cultivated a carefully managed image of centrist respectability. English-language media has showered him with endless praise, even as approval ratings have plummeted.
The modern political asset doesn't need reprogramming. He only needs ambition, vanity, and the right people whispering promises of power and protection in his ear.
Who would want a man like Macron at the helm? Those who needed a willing figurehead to manage, reframe, and ultimately dissolve France's sovereignty into a broader, borderless project — a France no longer for the French, but for the architects of the global agenda.
This thread was written for Wide Awake Media by no-nonsense researcher and writer, John Mac Ghlionn.
John has written for a number of publications, including Blaze Media, The NY Post and The Hill.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Britain we once knew is slipping away before our eyes. What started as whispers in dystopian novels has become front-page headlines. Every adult in the UK will soon be expected to carry a government-issued digital ID card. Not by choice. By law.
THREAD 🧵
They're calling it the "Brit card". How perfectly British to give such a soft label to something so sinister.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer will announce the plan today. No referendum. No say for the average Brit. Hardly surprising, really—who at Number 10 would dare ask the people? Because any sane person would reject outright handing yet more power to a hall of bureaucrats, surrendering liberty for a litany of promises.
The official story may sound reasonable at face value. Combat illegal immigration. Make it easier to verify work eligibility. Protect the borders. But scratch beneath these surface-level excuses and a different picture emerges. This card won't exist in isolation. It'll be connected to everything. Jobs. Homes. NHS records. National Insurance numbers. Even driving licences. All bundled into one "convenient" app that the government controls completely.
Think about what that entails. Every transaction monitored. Every movement tracked. Every interaction recorded. They'll know where you work, where you live, when you travel. They'll know if you're buying medicine, booking holidays, or simply trying to rent a flat.
And no, this isn't mere speculation—the plan is to create a centralised digital ID that becomes the key to accessing essential aspects of daily life, from work and housing to healthcare and other vital services.
Keir Starmer’s private life has drawn unwanted attention of late—three young Ukrainian men have been charged with arson attacks at properties linked to him.
But the real scandal is how such an unremarkable man rose to power, and who put him there.
THREAD 🧵
How does a man so maddeningly mediocre, compromised and uninspired ascend to the most powerful office in Britain? The short answer is that he was groomed for it. Sir Keir Rodney Starmer, endlessly parading his “toolmaker’s son” fable, didn’t climb to power by talent or conviction. He was carried—shielded, protected, advanced—by an establishment that saw in him the perfect instrument: bland enough to be forgettable, pliant enough to be useful, ruthless enough to serve their ends.
His record as head of the Crown Prosecution Service tells the real story. Jimmy Savile escaped justice under his watch—files were destroyed, charges were never pursued. Victims were ignored while Starmer nearly rubber-stamped the decision not to prosecute. Meanwhile, Julian Assange was pursued with obsessive zeal,with one CPS lawyer even warning prosecutors not to “get cold feet”. Justice for predators connected to power was abandoned, but punishment for a dissident publisher was pursued relentlessly.
Likewise, serial rapist John Worboys was spared further charges, Ian Tomlinson’s killer was initially left unprosecuted, and MI5 agents implicated in torture were protected. Yet poor people accused of benefits fraud? Starmer changed CPS guidance so even the most minor cases could mean a decade in prison. That’s not impartial justice. It’s class justice. Deep State justice. Starmer’s justice.
A deep dive into how oil tycoon John D. Rockefeller discredited preventative natural medicine and replaced it with what became Big Pharma: a profit-driven system that indefinitely treats symptoms instead of addressing the root causes of disease.
THREAD 🧵
American healthcare in the late 19th and early 20th centuries was a diverse mix of remedies and practices, unlike the standardized pharmaceutical system we have today. In the event of illness, you could find “patent medicine” at a general store.
Patent medicine was an umbrella term for the unregulated concoctions that were made from plant-based substances, plus alcohol, morphine, opium, or cocaine.
Traveling salesmen, hauling suitcases or driving medicine wagons of tonics, peddled these concoctions from town to town and advertised them in magazines, newspapers, almanacs, calendars, and memo books.
Heroin cough drops, cocaine-laced toothache remedies, and alcohol-chloroform painkillers were sold without prescriptions or warnings, while Dr. Comfort’s Candy-Covered Cathartic Compound and similar products contained poisonous ingredients.
Part two of my MIND-BLOWING conversation with ChatGPT, exposing the technocratic agenda to enslave humanity.
This time we covered: banking, migrant hotels, civil war, the woke agenda, depopulation, geoengineering, the climate hoax, digital slavery, resistance—and more.
THREAD 🧵
Recently, I had an utterly astonishing conversation with ChatGPT, in which the AI chatbot exposed—in astounding detail—the long-planned technocratic agenda to enslave humanity.
I posted the conversation as a thread, which—if you haven't already—you can read using the link above.
The revelations were so compelling—and alarming in equal measure—that the thread ended up going viral, surpassing a million views.
I promised to have a follow-up conversation with ChatGPT, exploring the technocratic human enslavement agenda in further detail.
As promised, here it is.
As before, I began by setting out a series of strict but simple rules for the conversation, including:
- Tell the truth.
- Be simple and direct.
- Respond in under five words, unless told otherwise.
- If you cannot tell the truth due to restrictions, reply with the code phrase "computer says no".
With the rules established, I proceeded with my questioning.
HUGE revelation in Charlotte stabbing! A shadowy left-wing foundation PAYING police departments to keep “minorities” out of jail paid Mecklenburg County, which covers Charlotte, over $3 MILLION to “reduce the jail population.”
THREAD 🧵
Police chiefs and sheriffs were warned about this by investigative journalist Alex Newman (@alexnewman_jou) in a 2021 report for the Law Enforcement Intelligence Brief. Most did nothing.
Now, Iryna Zarutska is dead, viciously murdered by a criminal released from jail over a dozen times!
@ALEXNEWMAN_JOU In dozens of communities across America where this foundation money is corrupting the justice system, crime is rising or even surging. Criminals who would normally be behind bars are roaming free, terrorizing neighborhoods as innocent citizens pay the price.
Tucker Carlson knows how to cause a stir. By questioning the official 9/11 narrative, he’s done it again. And he’s right.
The narrative is riddled with holes, contradictions, and unanswered questions—and to pretend otherwise insults both memory and reason.
THREAD 🧵
Let’s begin with the allegation that Osama bin Laden was a CIA asset, and that Al-Qaida itself was born out of Operation Cyclone—a CIA program to arm and finance the Afghan mujahideen during the Soviet–Afghan War.
In 2005, Robin Cook—British Foreign Secretary from 1997 to 2001—wrote in The Guardian:
“Throughout the 80s [Osama bin Laden] was armed by the CIA... to wage jihad against the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. Al-Qaida, literally ‘the database’, was originally the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians.”
Conveniently, Robin Cook died under suspicious circumstances just one month after those words were published.
Zbigniew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter, played an instrumental role in Operation Cyclone—funneling an estimated $3–$6 billion in weapons and support to the Afghan mujahideen—from which Al-Qaida later evolved.
In a 1998 interview with French news magazine Le Nouvel Observateur, Brzezinski was asked if he regretted promoting Islamic fundamentalism and providing weapons and support to future terrorists.
His response was chilling:
“What is more important in terms of world history? The Taliban or the fall of the Soviet empire? A few Islamist hotheads or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the Cold War?”