🧵BITCOIN TORQUE: THE ULTIMATE METAPLANET BULL CASE
None of you are ready for the next decade of Metaplanet.
This is the GREATEST INVESTMENT I have ever come across👇
Alright, kids. STRAP IN.
Time for some quick education before you see the numbers that BREAK your BRAIN:
What “BTC Torque” means:
BTC Torque = BTC $ Value ÷ BTC Capital
Bitcoin Torque is the return on invested capital (ROIC) for a Bitcoin treasury.
Higher torque means every dollar raised to buy BTC produces many more dollars of BTC value over time.
Related info before your brain breaks:
BTC $ Value = BTC $ Gain + BTC $ Income.
BTC $ Income is the UNREALIZED gain on the specific BTC financed, minus financing costs, multiplied by an efficiency factor.
mNAV = Enterprise Value ÷ BTC NAV. This is the “premium to NAV.”
WHAT THE SENSITIVITY TABLES ARE SAYING:
With common stock funding, torque only rises when the equity trades at a premium.
At a 30% Bitcoin ARR over the next 10 years, examples below show torque stepping high at very high mNAV setups.
Translation: common stock issuance is very accretive only when the premium is already rich.
The story is different for the incoming preferred stock:
With a fixed dividend assumption of 5% and a 10-year horizon, torque is mNAV agnostic.
At 30% Bitcoin ARR (conservative IMHO) - there is a 13.3x torque on $100m of preferreds regardless of the mNAV.
All the values are the same regardless of mNAV level.
Massive torque potential on ALL preferred offerings, without worrying about current valuation of the common stock!
Example of a DOLLAR result:
A 10-year, 30% BTC ARR scenario on $100m of preferred issuance produces $1.22 BILLION of BTC $ Income, and 13.3x torque.
Remember: TOTALLY INDEPENDENT OF mNAV.
By contrast, $100m raised via common delivers a wide range of outcomes that rely on sustaining a high valuation multiple.
Remember the, the issuance of $100m of preferreds is a FRACTION of the planned plan of $3.76 BILLION (¥555 billion).
Why this is INCREDIBLY BULLISH for Metaplanet over the next decade:
1. PREMIUM AGNOSTIC COMPOUNDING
Preferreds clearly create high, repeatable torque without needing the fat equity premium.
This means the treasury can compound through bullish, neutral, or corrective equity tape, rather than waiting for windows of high mNAV to issue stock.
This keeps BTC per share and BTC $ Value compounding on schedule.
2. Japan's Cost of Capital Advantage
Japan has the lowest long bond yields in the G7.
A lower domestic yield base means preferred dividends can be set at attractive coupons for investors while remaining far below expected multi-year BTC ARR.
This widens the spread that fuels BTC $ Income, which is the engine behind torque.
3. Metaplanet's risk discipline BAKES IN survivability.
Aggregate preferred issuance is capped at ≤25% of BTC Net Asset Value in the framework, and the deck shows coverage even under severe BTC drawdowns.
This reduces the probability that financing costs overwhelm BTC appreciation in bad years, so the 10-year math has more chances to play out.
Survivability is a torque multiplier.
4. The mNAV now has DEFENSE.
Because preferreds are accretive regardless of mNAV, they defend the premium when it is soft, and when the premium is rich the company can opportunistically use common as well.
This two-engine approach reduces dependence on any single market condition and stabilizes the path to the 210k BTC aspiration.
5. Flywheel with BTC Income Generation
Preferred proceeds go to BTC purchases and to a recurring options premium business.
Those cash flows help support dividends and working capital, which sustains the preferred program, which finances more BTC, which enlarges BTC NAV, which deepens over-collateralization, which attracts more capital.
A reinforcing loop is exactly what a decade-long torque story needs.
6. THE GIGA-BULLISH MATH
The math points to OUTSIZED VALUE CREATION for shareholders.
If BTC’s ARR averages 20 to 40 percent, preferred-funded torque spans 5.7x to 28.4x.
Even at 10 percent ARR, torque is 2.1x.
Over a decade this stacks with BTC $ Income compounding...
Which quantifies in the hundreds of millions to billions per $100M tranche.
How many tranches will they be able to offer with fixed income products paying FOUR TIMES what Japanese government bonds do?
The Bottom Line:
BTC Torque reframes capital raising as a compounding engine rather than a one-off dilution event.
The preferred blueprint shifts success dependence away from fickle equity premiums and toward multi-year BTC appreciation and time in the market.
With permanent, low-cost capital in a low-yield jurisdiction, risk caps tied to BTC NAV, and explicit 10-year math that stays accretive across mNAV regimes...
The setup is structurally, RIDICULOUSLY bullish for Metaplanet through the next decade.
You are not prepared for a LEVERAGED BET on a CERTAINTY.
You know Bitcoin is inevitable.
Are you gonna place your bet with the team that knows this the most, in the best economic situation for arbitrage IN THE WORLD?
It's go time.
If you don't like the stock, check your pulse.
If you'd like the video version where I break down Metaplanet's BITCOIN-BACKED PREFERRED STOCK CAPITAL SUPERWEAPON...
Here you go :)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
JPMorgan just filed structured notes tied to BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF with leveraged upside, conditional early call, and multiyear convexity exposure.
To decode this, you need to understand what banks actually use these notes for.
This is JPMorgan selling convexity on Bitcoin into institutional demand while hedging the other side internally.
This product shows JPMorgan believes:
Bitcoin is too big to ignore and too profitable not to financialize.
Let’s break it down.👇
1. JPMorgan Is Packaging Bitcoin Volatility into a Bank-Friendly Derivative
A structured note is Wall Street’s favorite trick for one thing:
Take a volatile asset, slice it, repackage it, and sell it at a spread.
Bitcoin is the most volatile large-cap asset in existence. Banks LOVE that because volatility is literally the raw material for financial engineering.
What JPMorgan is actually selling is:
Short-vol call protection (via the early call feature)
Long-vol convexity participation (if BTC is down in 2026 but up big by 2028)
A coupon-like payoff that is directionally dependent
Exposure through BlackRock’s ETF so they don’t touch physical BTC
They aren’t selling “Bitcoin.”
They're selling Bitcoin’s volatility surface.
2. The Early-Call Trigger Is JPMorgan Protecting Its Own Ass
If the ETF price is above the preset level in 2026, the note is automatically called at a fixed payout.
This does two things:
A. Caps JPMorgan’s Liability
If Bitcoin rips between now and late 2026, JPM doesn’t want to owe clients massive convexity exposure.
So they force-close the product early.
B. Signals JPMorgan EXPECTS a BTC Rally Before 2026
You don’t add a call-away mechanism unless you think the probability of having to invoke it is high.
JPMorgan is quietly telling you:
“We think BTC will be higher by 2026.”
But they also want:
“Please do NOT make us pay you 1.5x upside through 2028.”
🧵HOW SAYLOR TURNS STRATEGY INTO A $10 TRILLION COMPANY - EASILY!
Listen up, snowflakes.
You don't buy MSTR because it "tracks Bitcoin".
You buy MSTR because it is quietly evolving into the central node of the BITCOIN CREDIT UNIVERSE.
This is a NEW SPECIES of CORPORATION.
AND THAT SPECIES ALWAYS WINS 👇
Let's begin by talking about BITCOIN AMPLIFICATION:
Amplification = Notional Preferred / BTC NAV
At 50% amplification, Strategy has:
Preferred Notional = 0.50 × BTC NAV
Right now, Strategy’s BTC NAV is roughly: $60.4B
So 50% amplification means:
$30.2B of perpetual preferred capacity.
Thirty. Billion. Dollars.
Of non-maturing, non-recourse, perpetual capital backed by Bitcoin.
This is not debt. This is not common equity.
This is synthetic Bitcoin leverage without liquidation risk.
How Much Bitcoin Can Strategy Buy at 50% Amplification?
At BTC ≈ $93k, $30.2B buys ≈324,000 BTC
Yes.
324,000 BTC.
Added on top of the 649,870 BTC they already hold.
That alone would take Strategy to 973,870 BTC
They would be 27,000 BTC away from ONE MILLION BITCOIN.
Think that's unrealistic?
THEY RAISED $800 MILLION LAST WEEK.
$7.7 BILLION IN JUST THIS YEAR IN PREFERRED EQUITY.
$26 BILLION IN COMMON EQUITY.
THE TRADING VOLUME OF THE STRATEGY PREFS IS OVER 3X WHAT IS WAS TWO MONTHS AGO.
50% AMPLIFICATION IS INEVITABLE BECAUSE THE BEST PRODUCT ALWAYS WINS IN THE MARKETPLACE AND TRADITIONAL FIXED INCOME PRODUCTS CAN'T TOUCH THESE YIELDS.
The 50-year mortgage is actually brilliant if your IQ is over 120.
Everyone else is screaming about debt slavery while the rest of us are running the numbers like, ‘Wow, I get to pay less per month AND the dollar collapses faster than I can?’
Congrats, you just turned your house into a leveraged short on the United States government.
Millennials finally get a win, and it’s betting against America’s ability to do math.
I LOVE all the people coming out of the woodwork with "NOBODY WILL DO THIS"...
Uh huh, I remember opting for a 30 year instead of a 15 year for this exact reason. And I'd do the same for a 50 year because I can do math and I love Bitcoin. LOL
You have 5 years to stack as much Bitcoin as possible before AI renders your labor obsolete.
We stand at the event horizon of humanity's most profound economic metamorphosis.
Here's how to position yourself accordingly 👇
THE PROMETHEUS MOMENT
IDC's projection of $19.9 trillion AI-generated GDP by 2030 represents more than economic growth.
It's documentation of a new species of value creation emerging from silicon and code.
Every dollar invested in AI models generates $4.60 in output, but here's the philosophical reckoning:
That 4.6x multiplier isn't just efficiency, it's the mathematical proof that human cognition is being distilled into algorithmic essence.
We're witnessing the industrialization of consciousness itself, where thought becomes commodity and intelligence becomes infrastructure.
The question isn't whether this benefits humanity, but whether humanity remains economically relevant in its wake.
THE LOGISTIC DETONATION
Inference costs collapsing 85% in 24 months signals something far more profound than technological progress.
It's the compression of human cognitive value into near-zero marginal cost.
When AI task execution drops below $0.01, we cross the Rubicon where algorithms become economically superior to humans in domains we never imagined surrendering.
History reveals that when transformative technologies breach this price threshold, adoption doesn't climb - it detonates.
The S-curve doesn't negotiate; it obliterates.
We're entering the 2-3 year window where the old world dies and the new one calcifies.