Matt Huber Profile picture
Aug 14 17 tweets 7 min read Read on X
🚨NEW article from me is OPEN access.

It explains the phenomenon of 'renewable capital' in the USA:

"a specific form of privatized wealth accumulation made possible by the ‘unbundling’ of electricity as a public utility."

Some highlights 👇🧵1/x
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/de…Image
It starts w/ a paradox. Andreas Malm argued 'stock' resources like fossil fuels were more prone to capitalist property relations than 'flow' resources like water, solar and wind power.

So why are the 'flow' resources of solar & wind almost entirely privately owned today? 2/x Image
Image
The answer? The renewable energy industry emerged from the deregulation of public utilities, but what are those?

✅Economic sectors deemed 'essential services' too impt to be left to markets.

✅Capital intensive industries requiring access a socialized investment model. 3/x Image
Image
Utilities built the 20th Century grid effectively, at low cost, but by the 1970s they became a villain of neoliberal ideology. Like unions/govt they were seen as barriers to market competition. 4/x Image
Image
The coalition that emerged arguing for electricity deregulation was diverse including industrial capital seeking lower electricity costs, neoliberal economists, and environmentalists, like Amory Lovins, who idolized small-scale decentralized energy generation. 5/x Image
The result of deregulation was a new capitalist on the scene - small-scale power producers (eventually called 'independent power producers'). These capitalists were dislodged from the utility system, & only cared about profits, not the larger 'public service' of the utility. 6/x Image
Image
The renewable energy industry was enabled by this policy pushing IPPs, and in the USA, "In 2023, 81% of wind generation and 86% of utility-scale solar photovoltaic (PV) generation was provided by IPPs."

The flow of the wind & sun was enclosed by capital.
7/x
IPPs generally mean 'utility scale' projects, but renewable capital also includes small-scale rooftop solar.

Here's Elon Musk in 2015 claiming w/ solar panels + his Tesla Powerwall, households can exit the utility system & go off grid (narrator: no you can't). 8/x Image
Image
But rooftop solar is frankly more expensive than utility-scale, so households/installers needed a subsidy.

Net-energy metering did this, and shifted utility/grid/infrastructure costs onto poorer working class households (from Severin Borenstein). 9/x energyathaas.wordpress.com/2021/06/01/roo…Image
The entire idea of 'behind the meter' implies rooftop solar is detached from the utility system and its larger socialized cost and public service model. 10/x Image
But homeowners≠capital. This model also relied on a new form of renewable capital: rooftop solar installation companies that are renowned for harsh labor practices and predatory loans.

Such solar capitalists were also dislodged from the public utility system. 11/x Image
Finally, it's not just capital getting rich. Since solar/wind are often land-intensive, the landlord class is able to extract big 'rents' from solar/wind projects.

As Marx said, this class maintains the 'historic precondition' of capitalism - private property in land. 12/x Image
Some farmers are turning their land over to solar farms simply because they can make higher rents doing so. 13/x Image
So what has deregulation got us? Not necessarily cheaper electricity. The main result? New centers of private wealth accumulation via renewable capital and rents. 14/x Image
In Conclusion, it's not too late to reverse this process and go back to a 'public utility' model were electricity is planned as an 'essential service' with a socialized investment model. @fredstaffordcs & I make the case here. 15/x damagemag.com/2024/04/01/the…Image
If we re-integrate the electricity system in a planned way, perhaps we can recapture 'the flow' resources of solar and wind to make use of them in a more coordinated and rational way. FIN
@threadreaderapp unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Matt Huber

Matt Huber Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Matthuber78

Jan 22
From Malm/Carton's Overshoot.

I'm cast as a 'most extreme' ecomodernist for 'uninhibited advocacy of nuclear power' (gasp!), yet they side w/ Jacobson et al on 100% renewables (most in energy policy/deployment find *this* 'extreme' no matter how many modeling studies u cite). 🧵 Image
For example, prominent voices in the Biden admin's decarb policy assert the necessity of 'clean firm' generation alongside solar/wind.

Decarb expert @JesseJenkins here argues clean firm is a necessary part of the electricity 'diet'. See prez here: acee.princeton.edu/wp-content/upl…Image
Image
Image
I see this kind of thing often on 100% WWS. Here's an expert on China energy policy (recent guest on Odd Lots) totally puzzled over Jacobson's claims on China's path (they are building loads of nuclear).
Read 7 tweets
Nov 26, 2023
I respect Malm's work a lot (he's a friend & comrade).

But here he characterizes my climate strategy as "extremely class-reductionist" &"hyper workerist."

I think this sheds some light on our different approaches to climate strategy. Quick 🧵1/n
Malm fits in a tradition of the post-60s left in rejecting one core principle of Marxism: working class agency.

Malm explains the premise below (ie WC passivity). But I think this position depends on the below being a *permanent historical condition* 2/n
There's a sense the WC will *never* again organize forms of political power associated with the heyday of labor parties & strong trade unions.

If true, the left must say "Farewell to the WC" & look for new "movements" (or as Michael Löwy says a "movement of movements"). 3/n Image
Read 15 tweets
Sep 2, 2023
Are you "outraged about the the interconnection queue"? Me too! There is more energy in the queue than we consume today! And most won't even be built! Madness!

Well, the masses are clamoring, & I'm gonna deliver:

A Marxist analysis of the interconnection queue problem. 1/x 🧵
Image
The problem boils down to a contradiction inherent to a society based on commodity production between private labor & social labor.

For Marx capitalism is weird because production is undertaken by independent & uncoordinated *private* producers, BUT....2/x Image
...each private producer (a capitalist employing/exploiting wage workers) is profoundly dependent upon the 'social labor' of the other producers who provision their inputs.

The *social coordination* of all this scattered private labor is done chaotically through *exchange*. 3/x Image
Read 25 tweets
Jul 14, 2023
I'm honestly tired of this debate, but one of the major Marxist journals has now fully embraced degrowth. I read JB Foster's introduction and wanted to tease out points of agreement and disagreement. 🧵1/x Image
First, we all can agree we want to shift to an economy that prioritizes ecological sustainability & provisioning human needs (and one that produces for 'use value' over profit/exchange value - & rejects how GDP narrowly fixates on the latter). 2/x
monthlyreview.org/2023/07/01/pla…
Second, we can agree that solving the ecological crisis requires a shift away from the anarchy of the market under capitalism and toward *planning* - lots of interesting history here on socialist planning. 3/x Image
Read 25 tweets
May 8, 2023
I'm definitely w/ Brett Christophers that the IRA on balance will further entrench private sector control over the energy sector. nytimes.com/2023/05/08/opi…
The FT this morning. The IRA is making all sorts of 'clean' investments palatable for Exxon-Mobil investors/shareholders. The 2020s are looking like yet another attempt to act as if we can pair large-scale, rapid decarbonization w/ private profit. on.ft.com/3nF4gd7 Image
Check out this solar and wind event in June. Decarbonization brought to you by Shell, JP Morgan etc. Image
Read 4 tweets
Mar 6, 2023
Re: Saito's response Marx only abandons the 'early version.' Forgive me: it's hard to read 'abandoned', 'completely parted ways w/' and 'discarded' HM & not get that impression.

But I tried to show Marx didn't abandon the "early version" & further it *is* HM - Why? 1/x
For me, the essence of historical materialism is understanding the "progressive character of capitalism."

In Capital, Marx shows how capital itself *socializes* the production process - integrates cooperation, science, & 'the collective worker.' 2/x
It also massively raises labor productivity. I just happened to teach the industrial revolution today. Marx & Engels lived through....THIS. For them, the vast increase of prod. capacity created conditions never before seen in history (& an opportunity to abolish poverty/class 3/x
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(