It starts w/ a paradox. Andreas Malm argued 'stock' resources like fossil fuels were more prone to capitalist property relations than 'flow' resources like water, solar and wind power.
So why are the 'flow' resources of solar & wind almost entirely privately owned today? 2/x
The answer? The renewable energy industry emerged from the deregulation of public utilities, but what are those?
✅Economic sectors deemed 'essential services' too impt to be left to markets.
✅Capital intensive industries requiring access a socialized investment model. 3/x
Utilities built the 20th Century grid effectively, at low cost, but by the 1970s they became a villain of neoliberal ideology. Like unions/govt they were seen as barriers to market competition. 4/x
The coalition that emerged arguing for electricity deregulation was diverse including industrial capital seeking lower electricity costs, neoliberal economists, and environmentalists, like Amory Lovins, who idolized small-scale decentralized energy generation. 5/x
The result of deregulation was a new capitalist on the scene - small-scale power producers (eventually called 'independent power producers'). These capitalists were dislodged from the utility system, & only cared about profits, not the larger 'public service' of the utility. 6/x
The renewable energy industry was enabled by this policy pushing IPPs, and in the USA, "In 2023, 81% of wind generation and 86% of utility-scale solar photovoltaic (PV) generation was provided by IPPs."
The flow of the wind & sun was enclosed by capital.
7/x
IPPs generally mean 'utility scale' projects, but renewable capital also includes small-scale rooftop solar.
Here's Elon Musk in 2015 claiming w/ solar panels + his Tesla Powerwall, households can exit the utility system & go off grid (narrator: no you can't). 8/x
But rooftop solar is frankly more expensive than utility-scale, so households/installers needed a subsidy.
Net-energy metering did this, and shifted utility/grid/infrastructure costs onto poorer working class households (from Severin Borenstein). 9/x energyathaas.wordpress.com/2021/06/01/roo…
The entire idea of 'behind the meter' implies rooftop solar is detached from the utility system and its larger socialized cost and public service model. 10/x
But homeowners≠capital. This model also relied on a new form of renewable capital: rooftop solar installation companies that are renowned for harsh labor practices and predatory loans.
Such solar capitalists were also dislodged from the public utility system. 11/x
Finally, it's not just capital getting rich. Since solar/wind are often land-intensive, the landlord class is able to extract big 'rents' from solar/wind projects.
As Marx said, this class maintains the 'historic precondition' of capitalism - private property in land. 12/x
Some farmers are turning their land over to solar farms simply because they can make higher rents doing so. 13/x
So what has deregulation got us? Not necessarily cheaper electricity. The main result? New centers of private wealth accumulation via renewable capital and rents. 14/x
In Conclusion, it's not too late to reverse this process and go back to a 'public utility' model were electricity is planned as an 'essential service' with a socialized investment model. @fredstaffordcs & I make the case here. 15/x damagemag.com/2024/04/01/the…
If we re-integrate the electricity system in a planned way, perhaps we can recapture 'the flow' resources of solar and wind to make use of them in a more coordinated and rational way. FIN
I'm cast as a 'most extreme' ecomodernist for 'uninhibited advocacy of nuclear power' (gasp!), yet they side w/ Jacobson et al on 100% renewables (most in energy policy/deployment find *this* 'extreme' no matter how many modeling studies u cite). 🧵
For example, prominent voices in the Biden admin's decarb policy assert the necessity of 'clean firm' generation alongside solar/wind.
Decarb expert @JesseJenkins here argues clean firm is a necessary part of the electricity 'diet'. See prez here: acee.princeton.edu/wp-content/upl…
I see this kind of thing often on 100% WWS. Here's an expert on China energy policy (recent guest on Odd Lots) totally puzzled over Jacobson's claims on China's path (they are building loads of nuclear).
Are you "outraged about the the interconnection queue"? Me too! There is more energy in the queue than we consume today! And most won't even be built! Madness!
Well, the masses are clamoring, & I'm gonna deliver:
A Marxist analysis of the interconnection queue problem. 1/x 🧵
The problem boils down to a contradiction inherent to a society based on commodity production between private labor & social labor.
For Marx capitalism is weird because production is undertaken by independent & uncoordinated *private* producers, BUT....2/x
...each private producer (a capitalist employing/exploiting wage workers) is profoundly dependent upon the 'social labor' of the other producers who provision their inputs.
The *social coordination* of all this scattered private labor is done chaotically through *exchange*. 3/x
I'm honestly tired of this debate, but one of the major Marxist journals has now fully embraced degrowth. I read JB Foster's introduction and wanted to tease out points of agreement and disagreement. 🧵1/x
First, we all can agree we want to shift to an economy that prioritizes ecological sustainability & provisioning human needs (and one that produces for 'use value' over profit/exchange value - & rejects how GDP narrowly fixates on the latter). 2/x monthlyreview.org/2023/07/01/pla…
Second, we can agree that solving the ecological crisis requires a shift away from the anarchy of the market under capitalism and toward *planning* - lots of interesting history here on socialist planning. 3/x
I'm definitely w/ Brett Christophers that the IRA on balance will further entrench private sector control over the energy sector. nytimes.com/2023/05/08/opi…
The FT this morning. The IRA is making all sorts of 'clean' investments palatable for Exxon-Mobil investors/shareholders. The 2020s are looking like yet another attempt to act as if we can pair large-scale, rapid decarbonization w/ private profit. on.ft.com/3nF4gd7
Check out this solar and wind event in June. Decarbonization brought to you by Shell, JP Morgan etc.
Re: Saito's response Marx only abandons the 'early version.' Forgive me: it's hard to read 'abandoned', 'completely parted ways w/' and 'discarded' HM & not get that impression.
But I tried to show Marx didn't abandon the "early version" & further it *is* HM - Why? 1/x
For me, the essence of historical materialism is understanding the "progressive character of capitalism."
In Capital, Marx shows how capital itself *socializes* the production process - integrates cooperation, science, & 'the collective worker.' 2/x
It also massively raises labor productivity. I just happened to teach the industrial revolution today. Marx & Engels lived through....THIS. For them, the vast increase of prod. capacity created conditions never before seen in history (& an opportunity to abolish poverty/class 3/x