The meeting at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson focuses primarily on ending the Ukraine war, but lurking in the background is the battle for the Arctic's future
🧵 Let's dive in
Arctic's geopolitical future
With tensions around the Middle East and military threats for maritime trade via the Suez Canal, the region is opening up for shipping, resources, and military ops.
Russia and China are racing ahead, leaving the US scrambling.
Russia and China are WORKING TOGETHER to develop the Arctic.
Joint naval drills, economic projects like the Northern Sea Route, and military cooperation are ramping up.
In 2025 alone, we've seen deepened ties, including a fourth working group meeting and accelerated reality from rhetoric.
China eyes it for trade routes; Russia for resources and security.
The US is deeply concerned.
Melting ice means new strategic flashpoints—Russia-China partnerships challenge the Arctic order.
DOD's 2024 strategy calls for more presence, but America lags.
Russia's leadership in Arctic development is unmatched.
They boast the world's largest nuclear icebreaker fleet—over 40 vessels, including the massive Project 10510 "Leader" class.
Nuclear-powered icebreakers with 160,923-horsepower engines made to ensure year-round navigation will become operational in 2027.
The US? Just a handful, prompting alliances like ICE Pact to catch up.
Trump's play: Pull Russia closer to the US
With economic interests overlapping in Alaska and the Arctic, he might pitch joint exploration or resource deals to counter China.
He's hinted at US-Russia partnerships in the region, aiming to weaken Moscow-Beijing alignment.
Reality check: Russia won't ditch China for the US.
Why? China is Russia's top trade partner by far.
No sanctions or proxy wars killing Russians.
Bilateral trade booms, with Arctic projects like LNG and shipping benefiting both.
Deeper ties
China and Russia share a "no limits" partnership, including military-tech coop in the Arctic.
Distrust exists, but systemic pressures push them together.
China never sanctioned Russia over Ukraine—unlike the West—and supports Moscow's concerns about NATO expansion.
Strategically, cooperating with a rising China makes sense for Russia.
As the US weakens (deindustrialization, ballooning debt, political dysfunction), China's economy strengthens—offering reliable markets for Russian energy and resources.
Why risk that for a volatile US alliance?
To sum things up:
While Trump might dangle Arctic deals to lure Russia away, his pitch is likely to fall flat.
Russia has absolutely no incentive to join the US in an anti-China alliance in the Arctic, or anywhere else for that matter.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨🇮🇱Israel's Global Spy Network: Meet the Countries Helping Mossad
Let's dissect the myth of Israeli intelligence supremacy. The recent assassinations operations in Iran and Lebanon weren't solo triumphs but exposes a regime dependent on external backing.
Here's how🧵
🇸🇦🇦🇪Saudi Arabia & UAE:
Provide critical financial channels, political cover, and share vital intelligence on Iranian proxy movements through joint command centers.
🇪🇬🇯🇴Egypt & Jordan:
Offer territorial access for surveillance and coordinate border security, creating a perimeter that directly benefits Israeli intelligence operations.
🚨🇨🇳🇺🇸The Unwinnable Trade War? Why China's economic fortress is stronger than ever
The US just launched its most aggressive trade salvo yet with new tariffs. But this time, China isn't flinching, 2018 playbook is obsolete.
Here’s why the dynamics have shifted against the US🧵
Factor 1: A Radically Different Global Macro Backdrop.
In 2018, China faced a perfect storm: aggressive Fed rate hikes and a domestic deleveraging campaign. This hurt global demand & Chinese exports.
Today? The mirror image. Central banks are easing, and major economies are deploying fiscal stimulus. Resilient Chinese exports now reflect resistant global consumption (especially in the US), not weak external demand. The tide is lifting all boats, China's included.
Factor 2: Structural Gains in Export Competitiveness.
This is the silent game-changer. Over the past 7 years, a prolonged domestic deflationary environment acted as a pressure cooker for Chinese manufacturers.
They've climbed the value chain, becoming more efficient and innovative. The result is a price-performance advantage that is extraordinarily difficult for competitors to replicate, even with subsidies. They are simply leaner and more competitive.
🚨🇷🇺🇺🇦Russia's Energy War 2.0: A Strategic Shift from Shock to Siege
Russia's campaign against Ukrainian energy is no longer about spectacle. It has evolved into a methodical, multi-year strategy to weaponize winter & fracture society.
Here's how👇🧵
Phase 1 (2022-23): The Blunt Instrument.
Objective: Demonstrate capability & test resilience.
🔸Mass, indiscriminate strikes on large generation assets.
🔸Result: Severe but manageable via emergency measures (rolling blackouts, load maneuvering). The system, while wounded, proved adaptable.
Phase 2 (2024): From Disruption to Degradation.
A strategic pivot triggered by Kiev's escalation (e.g., Kursk incursion). The goal shifted:
🔸Old: Temporary disruption.
🔸New: Create a permanent energy deficit.
🔸Outcome: Rolling blackouts became the grim norm, exhausting rapid recovery capacity.
🚨🇺🇸🇮🇱🇵🇸Why Trump's Gaza Ceasefire is Doomed to Fail
The spectacle of world leaders gathering for a "peace plan" signing in Sharm El-Sheikh, is a significant political optic.
But the most telling detail was who wasn't in the room: neither Israel nor Hamas attended. 👇🧵
This wasn't a peace signing. It was a "wedding without a bride or groom."
You can't forge an agreement between two warring parties when they refuse to even show up. This highlights a fundamental lack of buy-in from the primary actors in the conflict.
Why was Netanyahu absent?
A key reason: most attendees had recently recognized Palestinian statehood. Bibi, whose government explicitly rejects a Palestinian state, wanted no photos suggesting endorsement. This reveals an unbridgeable chasm between Israel's aims and the international consensus.
🚨🇺🇦🇷🇺Ukraine Plunged Into Darkness: Massive Retaliatory Strikes Cripple Energy Network
Russia launches massive, coordinated attack on Ukrainian energy infrastructure. This is a response to recent Ukrainian drone attacks on Russian territory.
Here's a breakdown🧵
📍Kiev: Capital in total darkness
🔸30+ explosions reported in the capital by Geran drones.
🔸2 thermal power plants hit.
🔸Left bank district without power & water.
🔸Metro & train services disrupted.
Strikes are reported to be ongoing.
📍Krivoy Rog:
About 30 explosions reported in the city. Widespread power outages are being experienced by residents.
As gold smashes through $4,000/oz, a specific group of nations is leading a historic shift away from traditional reserves like the dollar.
These are the 10 countries ramping up now🧵
🇷🇺 Russia
Russia is the textbook example of a nation rushing to ramp up its gold reserves. It added a massive ~450 tonnes in just the first half of 2025, a 43.8% increase from H1 2024. This aggressive buying spree has brought its total reserves to 2,329.63 tonnes (as of Q2 2025), valued at over $217 billion.
🇺🇸 United States
The US is not actively buying new gold; its strategy is one of holding. It maintains the world's largest reserve at 8,134 tonnes (261.5 million ounces). While it isn't "rushing to ramp up," the surge in the gold price to $4,000/oz has pushed the market value of its existing reserves to a historic $1+ trillion.