The meeting at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson focuses primarily on ending the Ukraine war, but lurking in the background is the battle for the Arctic's future
🧵 Let's dive in
Arctic's geopolitical future
With tensions around the Middle East and military threats for maritime trade via the Suez Canal, the region is opening up for shipping, resources, and military ops.
Russia and China are racing ahead, leaving the US scrambling.
Russia and China are WORKING TOGETHER to develop the Arctic.
Joint naval drills, economic projects like the Northern Sea Route, and military cooperation are ramping up.
In 2025 alone, we've seen deepened ties, including a fourth working group meeting and accelerated reality from rhetoric.
China eyes it for trade routes; Russia for resources and security.
The US is deeply concerned.
Melting ice means new strategic flashpoints—Russia-China partnerships challenge the Arctic order.
DOD's 2024 strategy calls for more presence, but America lags.
Russia's leadership in Arctic development is unmatched.
They boast the world's largest nuclear icebreaker fleet—over 40 vessels, including the massive Project 10510 "Leader" class.
Nuclear-powered icebreakers with 160,923-horsepower engines made to ensure year-round navigation will become operational in 2027.
The US? Just a handful, prompting alliances like ICE Pact to catch up.
Trump's play: Pull Russia closer to the US
With economic interests overlapping in Alaska and the Arctic, he might pitch joint exploration or resource deals to counter China.
He's hinted at US-Russia partnerships in the region, aiming to weaken Moscow-Beijing alignment.
Reality check: Russia won't ditch China for the US.
Why? China is Russia's top trade partner by far.
No sanctions or proxy wars killing Russians.
Bilateral trade booms, with Arctic projects like LNG and shipping benefiting both.
Deeper ties
China and Russia share a "no limits" partnership, including military-tech coop in the Arctic.
Distrust exists, but systemic pressures push them together.
China never sanctioned Russia over Ukraine—unlike the West—and supports Moscow's concerns about NATO expansion.
Strategically, cooperating with a rising China makes sense for Russia.
As the US weakens (deindustrialization, ballooning debt, political dysfunction), China's economy strengthens—offering reliable markets for Russian energy and resources.
Why risk that for a volatile US alliance?
To sum things up:
While Trump might dangle Arctic deals to lure Russia away, his pitch is likely to fall flat.
Russia has absolutely no incentive to join the US in an anti-China alliance in the Arctic, or anywhere else for that matter.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Trump just threatened 🇷🇺 with 'severe consequences' if Putin doesn’t 'agree to end Ukraine war' immediately after Alaska
The truth? The US is in no position to dictate terms to Russia
🧵 Here’s why Trump needs a reality check:
REASON 1: UKRAINIAN MILITARY LOSING BADLY
Ukrainian forces in Pokrovsk are in danger of operational encirclement, and Russian troops are poking numerous holes in Ukrainian defenses along the Donetsk front
Pokrovsk isn't Ukraine's only problem
Russia is currently BOMBING THE SHIT out of the Ukrainian military production facilities and rail infrastructure
🚨🇺🇸🇷🇺Putin-Trump Talks – What to Expect? A Deep Dive into the Coming Negotiations
The stage is set for another high-stakes meeting between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump, but what can we realistically expect?
Let’s break it down🧵
1️⃣The Zelensky Factor: A Non-Starter for Russia
Putin has made it clear: talks with Zelensky are "very far away." Ukraine must first meet key conditions. Trump initially floated the idea but quickly backtracked, adding to the confusion.
🔸Key Takeaway: Russia won’t legitimize Zelensky without major concessions. The West’s insistence on his inclusion only delays real progress.
2️⃣The US "Peace Offer" – Smoke & Mirrors?
A Polish outlet claimed a leaked US proposal included:
- De facto recognition of captured territories
- Lifting sanctions
- No NATO membership guarantees for Ukraine
But Zelensky’s team denied it immediately. Likely, this was a trial balloon—testing reactions before real talks.
🚨🇺🇸🇮🇳US & UK’s Bully Tactics Backfire: India Could move Even Closer to BRICS
The US and UK are escalating economic, political, and covert actions to pressure India into abandoning its strategic autonomy.
From tariffs to Khalistani support, and even alleged sabotage plots, the goal is clear.
Here’s how:🧵
Downplaying ISI Terrorism in Kashmir
After 26 Hindus were killed in Pahalgam (ISI-linked attack) Trump dismissed it: "They’ll get it figured out". It emboldens Pakistan to escalate proxy warfare in Kashmir
If the US whitewashes ISI’s role, India’s retaliatory strikes (e.g., Balakot) risk being framed as "aggression," limiting strategic options
White House Backs Khalistani Separatists
Khalistani groups like Sikhs for Justice (SFJ), operating freely in the US, radicalize diaspora youth and fund violence in Punjab.
Recent attacks on Indian diplomats (e.g., San Francisco consulate) trace back to US-based activists
India’s External Affairs Minister Jaishankar has condemned the US for "double standards" on extremism. This erodes trust in the Indo-US partnership, especially on counterterrorism