If you don't outrun the money printer, your gains are FAKE.
$1,000,000 Bitcoin is cute, but purchasing power is the real test.
Here's how to calculate your real BTC return👇
Price going up is nice, purchasing power going up is the point.
Bitcoin at a higher dollar number only matters if your real return beats the rate at which dollars are being diluted.
Nominal returns are what you brag about, real returns are what you can actually eat.
The real return is the nominal return adjusted for inflation, the thing that tells you how much extra stuff you can actually buy.
Use a better yardstick than CPI when you think in macro.
Track the expansion of the money you are measuring with.
The broad U.S. money supply, M2, climbed from roughly $4.7T in 2000 to more than $22T by March 2025, which works out to about a 6 to 7 percent compound annual expansion with violent spikes along the way.
If your asset’s CAGR does not clear that monetary tide, your “gain” is a mirage.
Mental model that will save you from self-delusion:
Real BTC CAGR ≈ BTC CAGR minus the monetary expansion rate.
If Bitcoin compounds at 15 percent while the dollar pool compounds at 7 percent, your real gain is only about 7 to 8 percent, not 15.
That is the Fisher intuition applied to money supply growth, not just CPI.
Quick math checks to ground the hype in reality:
“$200,000 BTC by 2028” from a $100,000 starting point is ~14.9 percent CAGR.
If M2 runs 6 to 8 percent, your real CAGR is roughly 7 to 9 percent.
Great, but not the fantasy you feel when you see five zeros.
“$1,000,000 BTC in 10 years” sounds legendary.
Deflate that million by steady 6 to 8 percent broad-money growth for a decade and it buys what about $558,000 to $463,000 buys today.
The commas do not carry the same weight once you account for dilution of the unit.
Target setting for sober adults:
Your hurdle rate is not “beat the S&P,” your hurdle is outrun monetary expansion by a wide margin, then outrun your personal tax drag.
Nominal prints are marketing, real returns are survival.
Measure progress in things that matter, purchasing power baskets, energy, hours of high-skill labor, acreage, high-quality calories, not just dollars per coin.
Why this matters for maxis who plan to hold through $200,000 and beyond: the entire point of Bitcoin is to escape the treadmill that fiat forces you to run.
If your unit of account is leaking at 6 to 8 percent on a long horizon, then a nominal price target is only half a sentence.
The other half is, “did I increase my share of scarce goods and valuable time.”
If the answer is no, the zeros were just confetti.
So yes, celebrate $200,000, celebrate $1,000,000, then immediately ask the adult question.
What is my real CAGR after the dollar supply expansion, and how many units of real life did I gain?
When Bitcoin gets to a million, it will not be the million you imagine today.
The number of digits will rise, the purchasing power only rises if you truly outrun the tide.
That is the game worth winning.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let's go through EVERY SINGLE POINT of this argument to dismantle it.
DOUBTING SAYLOR IS A VERY STUPID MOVE👇
Transparency: The Glass House Principle
Unlike a Ponzi scheme - which operates with the opacity of a Swiss bank account managed by a mime - this strategy broadcasts its intentions with the subtlety of a Times Square billboard.
Every detail is meticulously documented in public filings, prospectuses, and financial statements that are more transparent than your ex's Instagram stories.
The beauty here is almost philosophical:
How can something be fraudulent when it's literally telling you exactly what it's doing?
It's like a magician who starts every trick by explaining exactly how the rabbit gets in the hat, then charges admission anyway.
People still buy tickets because they appreciate the craftsmanship.
Investors aren't being hoodwinked. They're making informed decisions with more data than most people use to choose a Netflix show.
Bernie Madoff's investors thought they were funding some mystical arbitrage genius; these investors know they're funding dividend payments through equity sales.
One group got bamboozled by smoke and mirrors, the other is consciously participating in corporate finance theater.
The difference is the same as between being pickpocketed and voluntarily buying overpriced coffee... both might leave you poorer, but only one involves deception.
Voluntary Participation: The Stockholm Syndrome That Isn't
Here's where the Ponzi comparison completely derails:
New common stock buyers aren't victims stumbling into a honey trap... they're sophisticated actors making calculated market decisions.
They're not being lured with promises of "guaranteed 20% returns from our proprietary trading algorithm" while the money actually goes to pay earlier investors' fake profits.
Instead, they're purchasing shares at prevailing market prices, armed with full knowledge of the company's structure, strategy, and the fact that their investment might literally be used to pay someone else's dividend tomorrow.
It's the financial equivalent of knowingly buying a ticket to a magic show where the magician openly admits there's no real magic...just sleight of hand and misdirection...
...but the performance is still entertaining enough to justify the price.
The sophisticated investor isn't a mark in this scenario; they're more like a patron of the arts.
They understand they're funding an elegant capital allocation mechanism, not falling for a get-rich-quick scheme.
When Ponzi victims discover the truth, they feel betrayed.
When ATM equity investors see their shares used to fund preferred dividends, they nod approvingly and perhaps buy more... because that's exactly what they signed up for.
It's the difference between being conned and being a connoisseur.
You're not poor. You're trapped in humanity's most successful hallucination.
This will BLOW YOUR MIND in understanding the matrix and make you understand Bitcoin on a PRIMAL and VISCERAL level👇
The Recursive Nightmare of Fiat
Fiat money is a recursive hallucination of itself.
A Möbius strip of circular references with no exit.
Each dollar derives its "value" from another dollar, backed by Treasury bonds, backed by the "full faith and credit" of a government that prints the very currency it promises to repay you in.
This isn't economics, kids. It's ontological fraud.
We're living inside Baudrillard's third-order simulacrum: money that no longer refers to anything real, only to other symbols in an endless chain of deferrals.
The dollar is a map that burned the territory and convinced you the ashes were always the destination.
The Collapse of Monetary Being
The fiat system achieved something unprecedented in human history: it collapsed the ontology of value itself.
For millennia, money was grounded in material reality: gold's atomic immutability, silver's conductivity, even cattle's biological utility.
These weren't arbitrary; they were ontologically anchored in the physical constraints of reality.
Fiat severed this anchor. What we call "money" today is pure floating signification.
Symbols pointing to other symbols in an infinite regress of deferred meaning.
Your paycheck is denominated in units of collective amnesia about what money used to be.