Students For Liberty Profile picture
Aug 19 10 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Brilliant economists are saying Hayek was right about the past, but AI changes the game.

"The calculation problem? Solved. Modern supercomputers can handle what Soviet planners couldn't."

Here's why even smart people are missing something fundamental. 🧵Image
This isn't new thinking. It's the return of an ancient conceit.

Soviet planners once believed they could organize society "scientifically." No more waste, no unemployment, just rational experts allocating resources perfectly.

They called it scientific socialism. We know how that ended.Image
What these AI evangelists miss is what Friedrich Hayek understood decades ago: the problem was never computational power.

The problem is information itself.

When the price of tin rises, you don't need to know why. You just need to know that tin is now more valuable elsewhere.Image
This is what makes markets miraculous. They coordinate billions of decisions using almost no information.

A price contains everything market participants need to know. Nothing more, nothing less.

The "economy of knowledge," as Hayek called it, operates on radical simplicity.Image
Economists proved this formally in the 1970s. Competitive markets are "informationally efficient." They use the absolute minimum information possible to achieve optimal outcomes.

No algorithm, no matter how sophisticated, can improve on this. It's mathematically impossible.Image
But here's the deeper issue that destroys the AI-planning fantasy entirely:

Much of human knowledge can't be articulated at all. It's tacit, experiential, embedded in context that no central system can capture.

How do you program an algorithm to invent the iPhone? Image
The entrepreneurs imagining breakthrough products, the local knowledge of specific circumstances, the cultural intuitions that drive innovation. None of this can be reduced to data points for an AI system to process.

Central planning fails not because computers aren't fast enough, but because the knowledge problem is unsolvable.Image
Today's AI democracy projects and algorithmic governance systems are just Soviet five-year plans with better graphics.

They promise to engineer away human complexity. But complexity isn't a bug. It's the feature that makes free societies innovative and resilient.Image
The fatal conceit lives on. Every generation thinks it has the technology to finally make central planning work.

But markets don't need to be improved by AI. They need to be protected from the planners who think they can build something better.Image
Want to learn how to defend these ideas when your professors push the latest version of techno-solutionism?

We built a survival kit that trains you to argue for liberty in hostile classrooms—and win.

👉 go.studentsforliberty.org/college-surviv…Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Students For Liberty

Students For Liberty Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sfliberty

Aug 18
A 16th-century Spanish priest wrote the first systematic defense of sound money, identified inflation as theft, and justified killing tyrants who imposed taxes without consent.

Kings banned his books. Executioners burned them. The Inquisition tried to erase them from history.

But this Jesuit monk had developed the core insights of Austrian economics 250 years before Austria even existed. 🧵Image
This is the story of Juan de Mariana, the original "politically incorrect" libertarian who out-Rothbarded Rothbard, out-Misesed Mises, and challenged the entire power structure of his time.

While most people think free-market economics started with Adam Smith, the real intellectual revolution began in the lecture halls of 16th-century Salamanca.Image
Born in 1536 as the illegitimate son of a canon, Mariana joined the Jesuits at sixteen and quickly became one of Europe's most brilliant minds. He taught at Rome, Sicily, and the Sorbonne, the Harvard of its day.

But brilliance wasn't enough for Mariana. He wanted to change the world.Image
Read 14 tweets
Aug 18
Milton Friedman was visiting China when officials showed him workers building a canal with shovels to create as many jobs as possible.

Friedman replied: "Then why not give them spoons?"

Sounds logical, right? More workers = better economy? Here's the logic politicians miss. 🧵 Image
The Chinese officials missed the point entirely. They weren't hired to create jobs; they were hired to build a canal.

Creating jobs is easy. Creating value is hard.

We could destroy every farm tractor in America tomorrow. That would create millions of new farm jobs overnight. But would anyone call that progress?Image
Here's what economists know but politicians ignore: job destruction is often the engine of human progress.

A hundred years ago, 40% of Americans worked on farms. Today it's under 2%. Agricultural output has exploded thanks to mechanization and innovation.

What happened to all those "lost" farm jobs?Image
Read 10 tweets
Aug 16
In August 1939, Britain and France were desperately trying to stop Hitler.

They had one last hope: convince Stalin to join them against Nazi Germany. Instead, Stalin chose to ally with the nazis.

This wasn't an accident. It was ideological sympathy. 🧵 Image
The scene in Moscow was surreal.

British and French envoys were begging Stalin for an alliance, but talks stalled over Poland accepting Soviet troops and the Baltic states falling into Stalin's sphere.

Stalin was stupefied by British refusal. How could British imperialists, who had seized one quarter of the earth, deny him the right to annex former Russian possessions?Image
Meanwhile, Hitler was growing anxious about a potential Soviet-Western alliance.

In May 1939, Stalin made a telling move: he replaced Jewish foreign minister Maxim Litvinov with Vyacheslav Molotov, whose main trait was never disagreeing with Stalin. This wasn't coincidence. It was preparation for Nazi talks.Image
Read 18 tweets
Aug 14
The Soviet Union promised equality, prosperity, and democracy for all.

— 7 million died in the Holodomor famine.
— 6 million people forcibly deported.
— 800,000 died during deportation.
— 40% lived in poverty.

Don't be fooled—life for regular people in the USSR was awful. 🧵Image
We're told constantly that socialism "just hasn't been tried correctly yet."

But the USSR wasn't an accident. It was socialism's most ambitious experiment.

And the results? A masterclass in how utopian promises become dystopian realities.Image
Stalin's Five-Year Plan gave the Soviet state control over Ukraine's agriculture. Ukrainian farmers were forced to sell their grain, land, livestock, and tools to the government.

They were enslaved on collective farms called "kolkhozes."

The result? Mass starvation from central planning's inevitable failures.Image
Read 9 tweets
Aug 13
You're a Soviet railroad commissar. No markets. No prices. Just you and a mountain range between two cities. How do you decide where to build?

This simple question reveals why socialism always fails. 🧵 Image
Through the mountains, you'd use less steel but massive engineering resources. Around the mountains, you'd use more steel but save engineering for other projects. Both steel and engineering are desperately needed elsewhere for irrigation, trucks, harbors, thousands of other uses. Image
To choose wisely, you'd need to know what millions of people know. What farmers know about crop yields. What grocers know about customer demand. What truckers know about delivery capacity. What families know about the meals they want to cook tonight. Image
Read 9 tweets
Aug 13
Was Jesus actually a socialist?

From progressive pulpits to college campuses to political debates, it’s a claim you hear everywhere today.

But what happens when we actually examine what Jesus taught versus what socialism requires? Let's investigate. 🧵 Image
To answer this fairly, we need to define socialism clearly. Many people define it as "government giving free stuff" or "people doing good things for others."

Well, if that's socialism, then F.A. Hayek was a socialist—he supported some social programs and certainly believed in helping people.Image
But that's not what socialism actually means. Socialism is the concentration of economic power in government hands: central planning of the economy, state ownership of production, and redistribution of wealth through political force.

That's what Karl Marx commanded, and that's what his followers tried to apply across the world.

Now let's see what Jesus actually taught about these things.Image
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(