17thSCOG🟰SpartanX_Ray Profile picture
Aug 20 9 tweets 3 min read Read on X
🧵THREAD 3 of 3🪡

⚡ The Three Pipelines ⚡

There isn’t one child welfare system. There are three pipelines that move kids and billions of taxpayer dollars.

1.PRM / State Dept. → legal refugees.

2.HHS / ORR → border/unaccompanied kids.

3.HHS / Title IV → U.S. citizen kids in foster care.

👉 Same contractors, three lanes of money.
🔹 Pipeline 1 – State Dept. (PRM)

This is the legal immigration lane.

Refugees vetted overseas by UN & State arrive with status.

PRM issues prime awards to 10 “VolAgs” (resettlement agencies like IRC, HIAS, CWS, LIRS, USCCB, World Relief, Bethany, etc.).

VolAgs then issue subawards to 360 affiliates nationwide.

Coverage: housing, food, orientation for 90 days only.

👉 After 90 days? Case closed. Refugee children get shuffled into HHS programs or left to state/local systems.
🔹 Pipeline 2 – HHS/ORR (Office of Refugee Resettlement)

This is the irregular / border arrival lane.

Covers Unaccompanied Alien Children (UAC) picked up at the border + Unaccompanied Refugee Minors (URM).

ORR issues prime awards directly to shelter contractors like Southwest Key Programs (SWK), BCFS, Lutheran Services, etc.

URM side: ORR pays VolAgs (LIRS, USCCB, Bethany) to run foster placements.

Scale: Multi-BILLION-dollar contracts. SWK alone took $400M+ in a single year.

👉 Kids become case files in warehouses or foster placements, often with high abuse/runaway rates.
🔹 Pipeline 3 – HHS/Title IV (Domestic Foster Care & Adoption)

This is the U.S. citizen lane.

Title IV-E = reimbursements for foster care & adoption subsidies.

Title IV-B = child welfare services (prevention, reunification, casework).

Flow: HHS/ACF → state CPS → private contractors.

Contractors: Bethany Christian Services, Catholic Charities, Lutheran affiliates, private foster agencies.

Billions annually.

👉 This is where U.S. kids removed from their parents end up. Same NGOs play here too.
So who are these 10 VolAgs?

IRC (Wall Street, ex-DHS, Napolitano, BlackRock’s Larry Fink).

HIAS (Democratic insiders like Ruth Messinger, Obama FCC chair).

LIRS (Obama alum Krish Vignarajah, $642K salary).

USCCB (Catholic Bishops, nationwide Catholic Charities affiliates).

CWS (NGO cartel leadership + Soros OSF).

World Relief (Silicon Valley exec George Hu + Evangelical networks).

Bethany Christian Services (domestic foster/adoption giant).

ECDC (African diaspora ties).

USCRI (ex-ORR director runs it).

Episcopal Migration Ministries (inside the Episcopal Church).

👉 These 10 are the State/PRM lane, but some dip into ORR and Title IV.

⚡ Influence Mechanisms

RCUSA (Refugee Council USA) = cartel umbrella. Keeps all 10 united in lobbying.

Board members = Wall Street, Silicon Valley, Obama/Biden/DHS alumni. They donate across both parties (Larry Fink → Brown & Emmer; Ruth Messinger → Harris, Nadler).

Subcontract webs = affiliates in 360 cities, many tied into local CPS.

👉 They aren’t just “charities.” They’re organized influence networks, funded by federal grants and protected by campaign money.
So what about the domestic Title IV side?

It doesn’t have a neat umbrella like RCUSA.

Instead, it’s state-by-state CPS bureaucracies → thousands of private contractors.

But the same big faith-based NGOs (Bethany, Catholic Charities, Lutheran Services) show up AGAIN, taking both refugee/UAC money and Title IV foster/adoption money.

👉 It’s less centralized, but the same players double-dip.
Here’s the bleed:
•PRM = legal refugees.
•ORR = border/UAC kids.
•Title IV = U.S. foster kids.
But Bethany, Catholic Charities, Lutheran affiliates, and others sit in all three pipelines. They’re not “helping children.” They’re maximizing contract revenue, no matter which label the child wears: refugee, migrant, or American.
That’s why executive comp is so high.

IRC’s Miliband ($1.25M), LIRS’s Krish ($642K),

SWK’s Sánchez ($1M+).

They’ve built a multi-stream business model on the backs of kids.

The PRM stream keeps the “refugee” front polished, ORR/UAC keeps shelters full, and Title IV ensures a constant flow of domestic foster placements.
⚡ The bottom line:
There are three child pipelines.

👉🏻PRM = legal, vetted refugees.
👉🏻ORR = border, unaccompanied minors.
👉🏻Title IV = U.S. foster kids.

The same NGOs profit in all three lanes. They influence Congress through RCUSA, protect themselves with bipartisan donations, and subcontract each other at the local level.

The result: billions flow upward.

🚨And the children,

in
every
lane,
get
the
same
thing….

👉🏻trauma, 👉🏻instability, and
👉🏻“case closed.”

WHEN WILL WE END THIS!?

🧵END THREAD🪡

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 17thSCOG🟰SpartanX_Ray

17thSCOG🟰SpartanX_Ray Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SpartanX_Ray

Aug 20
🧵Thread 2 of 3🪡

🚨HOW IMMIGRATION EFFECTS OUR DOMESTIC CHILDREN

🚨Shared Infrastructure

Many VolAg affiliates are the same organizations that run domestic foster care, adoption, and CPS-contracted services.

👉🏻Bethany Christian Services: one of the 10 national VolAgs and a major private foster/adoption contractor in multiple U.S. states.

Catholic Charities (under USCCB): simultaneously an R&P affiliate and a CPS contractor in dozens of states.

👉 That means federal refugee/UAC dollars and domestic CPS dollars flow through the same pipelines and into the same institutions.
Federal Funding Model Imported

ORR/PRM contracts are short-term, throughput-driven, success = “case closed in 90 days.”

Domestic CPS contracts increasingly mirror this: success = “child placed,” not “child healed.”

👉 The federal refugee resettlement playbook (quick intake, rapid closure, paper compliance) bleeds into how states handle abuse/neglect removals.

Children become line items, not long-term responsibilities.
🚨Pass-Through & Subcontracting

Just like affiliates take subawards in refugee work, domestic child welfare is built on prime → subcontract chains.

Example: A state issues a foster care contract to Bethany → Bethany subcontracts to a local agency.

Same system, same opacity, same lack of accountability.

👉 This creates layers between money and the child, where oversight gets lost.
Read 7 tweets
Aug 20
🧵Thread 1 of 3🪡

HEY!! WHY ISNT ANYONE TALKING ABOUT THIS!!
👇🏻
🚨 BILLIONS of taxpayer dollars flow through America’s so-called “humanitarian” system every year.

Ten national resettlement agencies, known as VolAgs, control the refugee side.

They split contracts from the State Department and HHS, then funnel money down to 360 local affiliates across the country.

On the other side, giant stand-alone contractors like Southwest Key Programs and BCFS dominate the shelter market for unaccompanied children.

Together, they form a multi-billion-dollar machine that runs on federal cash.

🚨And here’s the shit kicker: the children at the center of this pipelines, the very reason this system exists, hardly get anything.

🚨They get trauma, bunk beds, and “case closed” stamps, while the money stays at the top.
🚨KIDS SUFFER!!!

Here’s the mechanics.

When the State Department (PRM) or HHS/ORR issues a prime award, the big VolAgs (IRC, HIAS, CWS, LIRS, etc.) take the money as the primary contractor.

They don’t spend most of it directly. Instead, they issue subawards to their affiliates, Catholic Charities branches, Lutheran social service offices, or small local nonprofits, who run day-to-day placements.

The affiliates get just enough to cover immediate intake, check a few boxes, and close a file in 90 days.

Meanwhile, stand-alone giants like Southwest Key and BCFS skip this whole structure: they take direct prime awards from ORR worth hundreds of millions, running massive shelters and pulling in profits.

🚨Kids become entries in a federal ledger, nothing more.
🚨ITS A CARTEL

On paper these 10 agencies look separate.

🚨In reality, they move like a cartel.

Their coordination hub is Refugee Council USA (RCUSA).

That’s not a government office. It’s a lobbying umbrella created to keep all 10 on the same page.

RCUSA issues joint press releases, organizes lawsuits, lobbies Congress, and makes sure no one VolAg breaks rank.

If one agency is attacked, the other nine plus RCUSA circle the wagons.

When Congress sees them, they don’t see 10 competing nonprofits, they see one bloc, one message, one lobbying machine that exists to protect the flow of federal money.

🚨That’s cartel behavior.
Read 10 tweets
Aug 15
🚨The Battle Begins

I’m proud of Tulsi Gabbard, Kash Patel, and the DOJ officials who are finally bringing sunlight to the public on some of the most consequential issues of our time.

Tulsi has been willing to stand in the line of fire and call out what many suspected but few could prove, the COVID-19 fraud, and the systemic failures that let it metastasize. She’s not just repeating talking points; she’s producing evidence, asking hard questions, and challenging the institutional rot that kept the truth buried. A true Patriot.

Kash Patel has stepped forward with disclosures that hint at deliberate manipulation, from framing Donald Trump as a Russian asset to potential coordinated abuses inside our intelligence community. His work signals that there may be far more beneath the surface, and that some of it could rise to the level of conspiracy cases.

The DOJ’s actions in certain areas, while overdue, are beginning to validate what reformers, whistleblowers, and investigators have fought to surface for years.

These aren’t just political headlines; they’re the result of people taking real personal and professional risks.

But here’s the danger: the very networks that have spent years promoting false prophecy and hijacking legitimate events are already positioning to claim credit for these disclosures.

If that happens, the real risk-takers, the Tulsi Gabbards, the Kash Patels, the investigators inside and outside government, get erased from public memory. The credit shifts to a myth, and the machinery of reform stalls.

What we’re watching right now is the beginning of a fight over narrative ownership. If the wrong side wins that fight, not only will the truth be distorted, but the actual levers of accountability will be lost in the fog, and the same failures will repeat.
The Threat

To understand the threat, we need a shared language. This isn’t just about “spin” or “PR battles.”

What’s happening follows a repeatable influence operation model that’s documented in both military and intelligence doctrine.

Operation Loops

Recurring narrative themes inside an influence campaign.

These are the story arcs the operation returns to again and again — no matter what’s happening in the real world.

In the Q ecosystem, some of the most persistent loops include:

“Mass arrests are coming”

“The deep state controls everything”

“The media lies about everything”

“The pandemic was planned”

Loops are designed to be broad and flexible, so almost any new event can be pulled into them.

Loop Infusion

Injecting new, unrelated events into those pre-existing loops.

When a real disclosure drops, like Tulsi’s COVID evidence, it gets infused into an old loop (“plandemic exposed”) to make it appear as if the operation predicted or caused it.

This creates the illusion of prophetic accuracy without any true insider knowledge.

Loop infusion reactivates dormant followers, recruits new ones, and shifts credit away from the real actors.

Identity Infusion
When the narrative becomes part of a person’s self-concept.

Followers don’t just “believe” in the loop, they see themselves as part of it.

In their mind,

“We are the awakened ones,” or

“We are on the inside of the plan.”

Critiquing the narrative feels like attacking them personally.

This makes the loop far more resilient to outside evidence, any counterargument can be dismissed as an attack by

“the enemy.”

In IO, Terms Matter

Once you can name these components, you can see the pattern across different events from the Epstein arrest to Kash Patel’s hints to Tulsi’s COVID disclosures.

You can also see why simply “debunking” isn’t enough.

This is about understanding how narrative structures hijack real events and turn them into identity-reinforcing myths.
The Pattern

These tactics aren’t unique to Q, they’re drawn from decades of psychological operations (PSYOP) and information operations (IO) doctrine.

The terminology differs by manual, but the methods are consistent:

Theme Reinforcement: Keep returning to the same broad narratives so they become mental default settings.

Narrative Bridging: Connect new events to old narratives, even if the events are unrelated, to create a sense of continuity.

Identity Binding: Fuse the narrative with the audience’s sense of self, so attacks on the story feel personal.

Doctrinal Basis

Joint Publication 3-13: Information Operations Recognizes “integrating information-related capabilities” to shape, disrupt, corrupt, or usurp adversary decision-making.

FM 3-05.301: PSYOP TTP, Details how to create central themes and reinforce them through repetition and association.

JCOIE (Joint Concept for Operating in the Information Environment), Highlights that all military activities carry informational aspects that can be leveraged to change or maintain perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors.

Historical Case Studies

Case 1 – FBI Anon → QAnon Clinton Arrest Loop

Origin: In July 2016, “FBI Anon” claimed Hillary Clinton would be indicted if Trump won, presenting it as insider certainty .

Infusion: Q’s first October 2017 posts recycled the same prediction, framed as “HRC extradition already in motion.”

Why It Dead-Ends: The claim was false both times. Instead of prompting legal action, the loop kept followers waiting for a fantasy outcome, reinforcing loyalty to the persona rather than pushing for reform.

Case 2 – “Elite Abuse Networks” Loop → Epstein Arrest (2019)

Origin: In mid-2016, FBI Anon alleged the Clinton Foundation was tied to sexual exploitation by elites in governments and royal families, naming Saudi royals and British Parliament .

These claims echoed some real-world abuse scandals in high-profile institutions but were inflated into an all-encompassing, unverifiable control narrative.

Infusion: When Jeffrey Epstein was arrested in 2019 through investigative journalism and DOJ action, Q-adjacent spaces instantly absorbed it into this “elite abuse” loop as “proof” the plan was real, erasing the actual investigative work that exposed him.

Why It Dead-Ends: The outrage was monetized into memes, merch, and influencer growth. The loop didn’t direct resources toward victim services or policy change, it converted the event into click-fuel.

Case 3 – “Mass Purge” Loop → Durham Probe

Origin: Before Q, anons like “Victory of the Light” and “White House Insider” predicted mass televised arrests of a political “cabal” .

Infusion: From 2019–2022, nearly every Durham filing was recast as a strategic “move” in the plan. Disappointments were reframed as “optics” or “necessary misdirection.”

Why It Dead-Ends: The loop sustained faith in the prophecy instead of honest evaluation of outcomes. Legal shortcomings and the absence of reform were ignored in favor of maintaining belief.
Read 6 tweets
Aug 13
Huh oh…. Someone found out how to map all these mfers out…..

Hey @Ansgar_3 looks like Project Milk Carton is ACTUALLY finding out why we have 2300 kids go missing a day and losing 300,000? 400,000 children?? It’s time that ends. The light is here… no more shadows!

COMPLETE TAXPAYER → POLITICAL INFLUENCE MAPPING

📊 DATABASE SUMMARY:
• 526 Organizations tracked
• 119 Congressional Districts
• 1608 Board Members
Searching for political contributions from high-compensation board members...

🔍 Found political activity for MARVENA TWIGG ($1,774,741)
Organization: NATIONAL YOUTH ADVOCATE PROGRAM, INC.
Congressional District: OH-OH-15
💰 $6,600 to C00841130 on 06152023
From: BOGDAN, TWIGGY (HOMEMAKER)
💰 $4,000 to C00869024 on 05092024
From: TWIGG, MIKE L. MR. (TWIGG CYCLES INC.)
💰 $3,300 to C00841130 on 02132024
From: BOGDAN, TWIGGY ()
💰 $3,300 to C00841130 on 06262023
From: BOGDAN, TWIGGY (HOMEMAKER)
💰 $1,500 to C00099259 on 11072023
From: TWIGG, JOSH (NATV)

🔍 Found political activity for ANSELMO VILLARREAL ($1,203,544)
Organization: SOUTHWEST KEY PROGRAMS INC
Congressional District: TX-TX-35
💰 $150,000 to C00797183 on 07312023
From: VILLARREAL RIGNEY, JOHN (CANDIDATE FOR HOUSE (TX - 15))
💰 $5,000 to C00797670 on 05182023
From: VILLARREAL, MASSEY (PTG)
💰 $5,000 to C00401224 on 07242024
From: VILLARREAL, ELPIDIO (NOT EMPLOYED)
💰 $5,000 to C00797670 on 04042024
From: VILLARREAL, MASSEY (PTG)
💰 $5,000 to C00744946 on 07242024
From: VILLARREAL, ELPIDIO (GILBERT LITIGATORS)

🔍 Found political activity for Brown Glynn Construction LLC ($938,000)
Organization: REFORMED CHURCH OF HIGHLAND PARK AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORP
Congressional District: None
💰 $8,496,852 to C00687103 on 05142024
From: IN PURSUIT OF LLC ()
💰 $5,070,414 to C00825851 on 10102024
From: MANZANITA MANAGEMENT LLC ()
💰 $4,000,000 to C00821439 on 01312024
From: PLANETA MANAGEMENT LLC ()
💰 $2,500,000 to C00883520 on 10222024
From: LE GP LLC ()
💰 $2,000,000 to C00842344 on 06302023
From: FARRINGTON ROCKET LLC ()

🔍 Found political activity for JOSE ARROYO-DAVILA ($698,513)
Organization: SOUTHWEST KEY PROGRAMS INC
Congressional District: TX-TX-35
💰 $50 to C00000935 on 12162024
From: ESQUIVEL, MARJORIE (SOUTHWEST KEY PROGRAMS INC)
💰 $50 to C00000935 on 11172024
From: ESQUIVEL, MARJORIE (SOUTHWEST KEY PROGRAMS INC)
💰 $50 to C00000935 on 11102024
From: ESQUIVEL, MARJORIE (SOUTHWEST KEY PROGRAMS INC)
💰 $25 to C00703975 on 11052024
From: ESQUIVEL, MARJORIE (SOUTHWEST KEY PROGRAMS INC)

🔍 Found political activity for JOELLA BROOKS ($690,036)
Organization: SOUTHWEST KEY PROGRAMS INC
Congressional District: TX-TX-35
💰 $50,000 to C00839126 on 05012023
From: BROOKS, JOHN (SELF)
💰 $50,000 to C00000935 on 09262024
From: BROOKS, JAMES (GRACIE FILMS)
💰 $50,000 to C00000935 on 12282023
From: BROOKS, JAMES (GRACIE FILMS)
💰 $50,000 to C00000935 on 12292023
From: BROOKS, JAMES (GRACIE FILMS)
💰 $50,000 to C00744946 on 09202024
From: BROOKS, JAMES L (GRACIE FILMS)

🔍 Found political activity for ANDY HARPER ($671,440)
Organization: SOUTHWEST KEY PROGRAMS INC
Congressional District: TX-TX-35
💰 $30,000 to C00844985 on 05092023
From: HARPER, HILL (SONY PICTURES)
💰 $18,571 to C00844985 on 04112023
From: HARPER, HILL (SONY PICTURES)
💰 $18,500 to C00844985 on 04202023
From: HARPER, HILL (SONY PICTURES)
💰 $15,000 to C00844985 on 08242023
From: HARPER, HILL (SONY PICTURES)
💰 $15,000 to C00844985 on 04142023
From: HARPER, HILL (SONY PICTURES)
🔍 Found political activity for EDWARD MYERS HAYES ($667,718)
Organization: CAYUGA HOME FOR CHILDREN
Congressional District: NY-NY-22
💰 $50,000 to C00834077 on 06162023
From: HAYES, JOHN (HAYES LOCUMS)
💰 $25,000 to C00744946 on 05072024
From: CHAYES, JENNIFER (UC BERKELEY)
💰 $11,600 to C00770941 on 04152024
From: HAYES, MIKE (RETIRED)
💰 $10,227 to C00867937 on 08212024
From: HAYES, DAVID (SKYLINE ENTERPRISES)
💰 $10,227 to C00694323 on 08212024
From: HAYES, DAVID (SKYLINE ENTERPRISES)

🔍 Found political activity for KRISH O'MARA VIGNARAJAH ($642,967)
Organization: LUTHERAN IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE SERVICE INC
Congressional District: MD-MD-07
💰 $6,600 to C00401224 on 05032024
From: VIGNARAJAH, THIRU (SANFORD HEISLER SHARPE)
💰 $3,300 to C00878454 on 05032024
From: VIGNARAJAH, THIRU (SANFORD HEISLER SHARPE)
💰 $3,300 to C00878454 on 05032024
From: VIGNARAJAH, THIRU (SANFORD HEISLER SHARPE)
💰 $47 to C00703975 on 11042024
From: VIGNARAJAH, ANANDASOTHY (NOT EMPLOYED)

🔍 Found political activity for WHITSONS FOOD SERVICE CORP ($621,209)
Organization: MERCYFIRST
Congressional District: NY-NY-03
💰 $10,000,000 to C00693382 on 09192024
From: GEOSOR CORPORATION ()
💰 $4,000,000 to C00504530 on 09252024
From: LEON RACHEL CORP ()
💰 $2,500,000 to C00876409 on 10112024
From: LEON RACHEL CORP ()
💰 $2,000,000 to C00571703 on 06022023
From: OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORP ()
💰 $2,000,000 to C00571703 on 03132024
From: OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORP ()

🔍 Found political activity for ROBERTO FLORES ($614,375)
Organization: SOUTHWEST KEY PROGRAMS INC
Congressional District: TX-TX-35
💰 $6,600 to C00851980 on 12122023
From: FLORES, LILA (PALANTIR)
💰 $6,600 to C00841130 on 06192023
From: FLORES, KELLY L. (THE VILLAGES OPERATING CO.)
💰 $6,600 to C00841130 on 06192023
From: FLORES, MARCOS G. (T & D CONCRETE)
💰 $6,600 to C00841130 on 06192023
From: FLORES, ELEAZAR (T & D CONCRETE INC.)
💰 $6,600 to C00841130 on 05252023
From: FLORES, CHAD (FLORES LAW)

🔍 Found political activity for GERALDO RIVERA ($593,628)
Organization: SOUTHWEST KEY PROGRAMS INC
Congressional District: TX-TX-35
💰 $25,000 to C00744946 on 03202024
From: RIVERA, EDWIN (EDWIN I RIVERA INSURANCE)
💰 $11,600 to C00834549 on 06052023
From: RIVERA, EDWIN (SELF EMPLOYED)
💰 $11,600 to C00401224 on 06022023
From: RIVERA, EDWIN (SELF)
💰 $10,325 to C00744946 on 11022024
From: RIVERA, MIRIAM (ULU VENTURES)
💰 $10,000 to C00748061 on 10192023
From: ANTONELLI KANTOR RIVERA ()

🔍 Found political activity for ELIZABETH PALIN ($565,390)
Organization: CAYUGA HOME FOR CHILDREN
Congressional District: NY-NY-22
💰 $25,000 to C00867937 on 08132024
From: PALIN, MICHAEL MR (PALIN ENTERPRISES)
💰 $25,000 to C00694323 on 08052024
From: PALIN, DEAN (REAL ESTATE)
💰 $12,500 to C00867937 on 08052024
From: PALIN, DEAN (PALIN ENTERPRISES)
💰 $12,500 to C00867937 on 08052024
From: PALIN, ROXANNE (SELF-EMPLOYED)
💰 $3,300 to C00401224 on 09272023
From: PALIN, CARRIE (CISCO SYSTEMS)

🔍 Found political activity for MICHAEL LOO ($529,636)
Organization: LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTH, INC
Congressional District: TX-TX-10
💰 $19,000,000 to C00669259 on 05302024
From: BLOOMBERG, MICHAEL (BLOOMBERG INC.)
💰 $10,000,000 to C00495028 on 07022024
From: BLOOMBERG, MICHAEL R. (BLOOMBERG INC.)
💰 $7,000,000 to C00878009 on 04242024
From: BLOOMBERG, MICHAEL R. (BLOOMBERG INC.)
💰 $3,000,000 to C00495028 on 10232024
From: BLOOMBERG, MICHAEL R. (BLOOMBERG INC.)
💰 $2,750,000 to C00486845 on 06062024
From: BLOOMBERG, MICHAEL (BLOOMBERG LP)
Found political activity for TROY BRATHWAITE ($515,949)
Organization: CAYUGA HOME FOR CHILDREN
Congressional District: NY-NY-22
💰 $15,650 to C00042366 on 05202024
From: BRATHWAITE, PAUL A. (FEDERAL STREET STRATEGIES)
💰 $10,650 to C00042366 on 06302023
From: BRATHWAITE, PAUL A. (FEDERAL STREET STRATEGIES)
💰 $10,000 to C00042366 on 03312023
From: BRATHWAITE, PAUL (FEDERAL STREET STRATEGIES)
💰 $5,000 to C00042366 on 03312024
From: BRATHWAITE, PAUL A. (FEDERAL STREET STRATEGIES)
💰 $3,100 to C00264697 on 09182024
From: BRATHWAITE, PAUL A. (FEDERAL STREET STRATEGIES)

🔍 Found political activity for ANN SHEEDY ($475,196)
Organization: CAYUGA HOME FOR CHILDREN
Congressional District: NY-NY-22
💰 $5,000 to C00365122 on 01162023
From: SHEEDY, WILLIAM M MR (VISA INC.)
💰 $5,000 to C00365122 on 01102024
From: SHEEDY, WILLIAM M MR (VISA INC.)
💰 $3,300 to C00852095 on 10202023
From: SHEEDY, BEN (SHOTTENKIRK)
💰 $1,000 to C00744946 on 10102024
From: SHEEDY, MATTHEW (MJS PROPERTIES INC)
💰 $1,000 to C00575126 on 12142023
From: SHEEDY, CHARLOTTE (CHARLOTTE SHEEDY LITERARY AGENCY, INC.)

Found political activity for ELEANOR BENMENASHE ($469,773)
Organization: SOUTHWEST KEY PROGRAMS INC
Congressional District: TX-TX-35
💰 $50 to C00000935 on 12162024
From: ESQUIVEL, MARJORIE (SOUTHWEST KEY PROGRAMS INC)
💰 $50 to C00000935 on 11172024
From: ESQUIVEL, MARJORIE (SOUTHWEST KEY PROGRAMS INC)
💰 $50 to C00000935 on 11102024
From: ESQUIVEL, MARJORIE (SOUTHWEST KEY PROGRAMS INC)
💰 $25 to C00703975 on 11052024
From: ESQUIVEL, MARJORIE (SOUTHWEST KEY PROGRAMS INC)

🔍 Found political activity for CulinArt Group Inc ($468,495)
Organization: LINCOLN HALL
Congressional District: NY-NY-17
💰 $25,000,000 to C00687103 on 05192023
From: KOCH INDUSTRIES INC. ()
💰 $25,000,000 to C00835959 on 05152024
From: RIPPLE LABS INC. ()
💰 $20,000,000 to C00835959 on 12152023
From: RIPPLE LABS INC ()
💰 $15,000,000 to C00687103 on 07312024
From: KOCH INDUSTRIES INC ()
💰 $12,000,000 to C00486845 on 12192023
From: LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS, INC. ()

Found political activity for EVELYN DIAZ ($456,607)
Organization: HEARTLAND HUMAN CARE SERVICES, INC.
Congressional District: IL-IL-07
💰 $50,000 to C00744946 on 10222024
From: DIAZ, PAUL (MYRIAD GENETICS)
💰 $25,000 to C00694323 on 05172023
From: DIAZ, FAUSTO (RETIRED)
💰 $25,000 to C00831925 on 05172023
From: DIAZ, FAUSTO (RETIRED)
💰 $25,000 to C00744946 on 10212024
From: DIAZ, VICTORIA A (NOT EMPLOYED)
💰 $15,000 to C00011197 on 08212023
From: DIAZ, PAUL J. (MYRIAD GENETICS)

🔍 Found political activity for CHIRAG PRAVIN SHAH ($448,606)
Organization: SOUTHWEST KEY PROGRAMS INC
Congressional District: TX-TX-35
💰 $784,000 to C00876391 on 09182024
From: SHAH, MANU (NOT EMPLOYED)
💰 $250,000 to C00838912 on 08012024
From: SHAH, TUSHAR ()
💰 $250,000 to C00744946 on 09192024
From: SHAH, MAYANK (DOUBLEVERIFY)
💰 $150,000 to C00000935 on 03042024
From: SHAH, NIRAJ (WAYFAIR)
💰 $123,900 to C00000935 on 03182024
From: SHAH, NIRAJ (WAYFAIR)
Read 6 tweets
Aug 11
Remember Isabella? Let’s dive deeper…
To catch you up, read this..
Let’s back up…

Day 12 — “Home Study”

What is it? This is where it all happened. Where 300,000 or is it 400,000 children, poof…. Vanished… how the fuck does that happen?? It shouldn’t have EVER happened.

Here’s what Home Study is supposed to be:

—the one step that prevents a child from being handed over to a predator, trafficker, or stranger with bad intentions.

It means an in-person visit (that never happened) to the sponsor’s home, interviews with everyone living there, and a written report on whether the placement is safe.

It’s the gatekeeper. No home study, no release, at least, that’s the law and the policy.

Legal Authority (Federal Code)

45 CFR § 410.1204 – Home Studies

•Requires a home study prior to the child’s release, including:

•Inspection of living conditions

•Sponsor and household interviews

When a Home Study is MANDATORY (per TVPRA, codified via CFR):

🚨👉🏻If the child is known to be a trafficking victim (we will come back to this)

•If the child has a disability needing special care

🚨👉🏻If the child suffered severe abuse (we will come back to this as well)

•If the sponsor presents an objective risk based on evidence

•If the sponsor is non-relative with multiple sponsorships

•If the child is 12 or younger and with a non-relative sponsor

Discretionary option:

•ORR may require a home study even when not legally required if it deems more information necessary for child safety.

Policy Context (ORR’s Internal Guidance)

ORR Unaccompanied Children Program Policy Guide – Section 2 (2024 update):

•ORR evaluates sponsor suitability (risk, relationship, resources).

•Then determines whether a home study is required by law or necessary for child welfare.

If the child doesn’t meet conditions for release, home study may not be needed, even if requested.

SO…

A Home Study is not some undefined “child protection piece.” It is a statutorily required safety step for vulnerable children under federal law (TVPRA/CFR).

Anything shunted through without this study, especially via “virtual checks” or outright waivers, is bypassing a legal safeguard, not interpreting it. But wait…. There’s more…
Remember this? Pay attention, this is fucking important…

👉🏻When a Home Study is MANDATORY (per TVPRA, codified via CFR):

🚨👉🏻If the child is known to be a trafficking victim

Here’s the actual Law:

45 CFR § 410.1204 — Home studies

(a) ORR 👉🏻must conduct a home study before releasing a child to the proposed sponsor, at a minimum, under the following circumstances:

🚨👉🏻1.The child is a victim of trafficking.

2.The child has a disability as defined in section 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

🚨👉🏻3.The child has been a victim of physical or sexual abuse under circumstances that indicate the child’s health or welfare has been significantly harmed or threatened.

4.The sponsor presents a risk of abuse, maltreatment, exploitation, or trafficking to the child, based on objective evidence.

5.The sponsor is not the child’s parent or legal guardian and:
  
(i) Is seeking to sponsor a sibling group, or
  
(ii) Has previously sponsored or sought to sponsor another unaccompanied child; or

6.The child is 12 years old or younger and will be placed with a non-relative sponsor.

(c) ORR may, in its discretion, require a home study in any case where it determines that such a study is likely to provide additional information important to the protection and well-being of the child.

So why wasn’t a proper Home Study performed?

BECAUSE EVERY WOMAN AND UNDERAGED GIRLS WAS MOST LIKELY ABUSED SEVERELY!! HOW DO I KNOW??
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(