Millie Marconi Profile picture
Aug 20, 2025 12 tweets 4 min read Read on X
If you’re building or investing in AI and don’t understand agents… you’re flying blind.

Here’s your shortcut: 10 core concepts every founder should know:
1/ Agentic AI

This is AI that doesn’t just answer questions it gets shit done.

Basically, It can plan, make decisions, and act without you babysitting it.

Think of the difference between asking a human for advice…

And having someone who actually takes the action for you. Image
2/ Agent

The basic unit of Agentic AI.

An agent is a piece of software that can see what’s going on, think about it, and do something to reach a goal.

Example: an ecommerce agent notices a product is almost sold out, checks sales data, and automatically places a reorder. Image
3/ Perception

How an agent “sees” the world.

It might read text, scan a video feed, listen to audio, or process data in a spreadsheet.

The more senses it has, the better it can understand its environment.

Without perception, the agent is basically guessing. Image
4/ Reasoning

This is the thinking step.

once it knows what’s happening, the agent figures out the best move.

Example: traffic is blocked → check historical traffic data → cross-reference with live feeds → decide on the fastest alternate route.

Reasoning turns raw input into smart action.Image
5/ Action

The moment the agent actually does something.

it might update a database, trigger a process, send a message, or even control a physical device.

reasoning is theory.
action is impact. Image
6/ Tool use

Agents don’t just use built-in features they can call apis, run code, search the web, or access databases.

This lets them solve problems far outside their “native” abilities.

it’s like giving your assistant a whole toolbox instead of just a notepad. Image
7/ Context engineering

Feeding the agent the right information, at the right time, in the right format.

it’s like prompt engineering but bigger combining instructions, real-time data, memory, and rules.

Better context = better decisions. Image
8/ Model Context Protocol (mcp)

A standard way for agents and other systems to talk to each other, even if they’re built differently.

Think of it like bluetooth but for ai systems sharing goals, data, and instructions. Image
9/ Langchain

An open-source toolkit that makes building llm-powered agents way easier.

You can chain tasks together, give agents memory, and plug in tools all without reinventing the wheel. Image
10/ Agentflow

A no-code, visual way to design custom agents.

You drag-and-drop workflows, set rules, and the agent runs it all.

Great for teams that want ai power without writing a single line of code. Image
I hope you've found this thread helpful.

Follow me @Yesterday_work_ for more.

Like/Repost the quote below if you can:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Millie Marconi

Millie Marconi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MillieMarconnni

Feb 10
OpenAI engineers don't prompt like everyone else.

They don't use "act as an expert."
They don't use chain-of-thought.
They don't use mega prompts.
They use "Prompt Contracts."

A former engineer just exposed the full technique.

Here's how to use it on any model: 👇
Here's why your prompts suck:

You: "Write a professional email"
AI: *writes generic corporate bullshit*

You: "Be more creative"
AI: *adds exclamation marks*

You're giving vibes, not instructions.

The AI is guessing what you want. Guessing = garbage output. Image
Prompt Contracts change everything.

Instead of "write X," you define 4 things:

1. Goal (exact success metric)
2. Constraints (hard boundaries)
3. Output format (specific structure)
4. Failure conditions (what breaks it)

Think legal contract, not creative brief. Image
Read 13 tweets
Feb 9
Stop using "act as a marketing expert."

Start using "act as a marketing expert + data analyst + psychologist."

The difference is absolutely insane.

It's called "persona stacking" and here are 7 combinations worth stealing:
1/ Content Creation

Personas: Copywriter + Behavioral Psychologist + Data Analyst

Prompt:

"Act as a copywriter who understands behavioral psychology and data-driven content strategy. Write a LinkedIn post about [topic] that triggers curiosity, uses pattern interrupts, and optimizes for engagement metrics."

Result: Content that hooks AND converts.Image
Image
2/ Product Strategy

Personas: Product Manager + UX Designer + Economist

Prompt:

"Act as a product manager with UX design expertise and economic modeling skills. Analyze this feature request considering user experience, development costs, and market positioning. What's the ROI?"

Result: Decisions backed by multiple frameworks.Image
Image
Read 12 tweets
Feb 5
Most people use Perplexity like a fancy Google search.

That's insane.

It's actually a full-blown research assistant that can compress 10 hours of analysis into 20 seconds if you feed it the right prompts.

Here's what actually works: Image
1. Competitive Intelligence Dashboard

Prompt I use:

"
Create a competitive analysis for [COMPANY/PRODUCT] covering:

1. Recent product launches (last 90 days)
2. Pricing changes (with before/after if available)
3. Customer sentiment (Reddit, Twitter, G2 reviews - categorize positive/negative themes)
4. Technical stack (from job postings and tech blogs)
5. Funding/financial news (any recent rounds, partnerships, layoffs)

Format as a table:
| Category | Key Findings | Source Date | Impact Assessment |

Focus on information from the last 30 days. Cite every claim.
"
2. Technical Comparison Matrix

Prompt:

"
Compare [TOOL A] vs [TOOL B] vs [TOOL C] for [SPECIFIC USE CASE]:

Build a decision matrix:
| Feature | Tool A | Tool B | Tool C | Winner & Why |

Must include:
- Pricing (exact tiers, hidden costs)
- Performance benchmarks (from independent tests)
- Integration options (with [MY STACK])
- Community size (GitHub stars, Discord members, Stack Overflow activity)
- Recent updates (last 3 months)
- Known issues (from issue trackers, Reddit)

Rank overall winner with confidence score (1-10) and reasoning.

Cite every benchmark and review.
"
Read 13 tweets
Feb 3
Plot twist: The best prompts are negative.

After using ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini professionally for 2 years, I realized telling AI what NOT to do works better than telling it what to do.

Here are 8 "anti-prompts" that changed everything: Image
1/ DON'T use filler words

Instead of: "Write engaging content"

Use: "No fluff. No 'delve into'. No 'landscape'. No 'it's important to note'. Get straight to the point."

Result: 67% shorter outputs with 2x more substance.

The AI stops padding and starts delivering. Image
Image
2/ DON'T explain the obvious

Add this line: "Skip introductions. Skip conclusions. Skip context I already know."

Example: When asking for code, I get the function immediately.

No "Here's a Python script that..." preamble.

Saves 40% of my reading time. Image
Image
Read 12 tweets
Jan 31
OpenAI and Anthropic engineers leaked the secret to consistent AI outputs.

I've been using insider knowledge for 6 months. The difference is insane.

Here's what they don't want you to know (bookmark this). Image
Step 1: Control the Temperature

Most AI interfaces hide this, but you need to set temperature to 0 or 0.1 for consistency.

Via API:

ChatGPT: temperature: 0
Claude: temperature: 0
Gemini: temperature: 0

Via chat interfaces:

ChatGPT Plus: Can't adjust (stuck at ~0.7)
Claude Projects: Uses default (~0.7)
Gemini Advanced: Can't adjust

This is why API users get better consistency. They control what you can't see.

If you're stuck with web interfaces, use the techniques below to force consistency anyway.Image
Step 2: Build a System Prompt Template

Stop rewriting your prompt every time.

Create a master template with fixed structure:

ROLE: [Exactly who the AI is]
TASK: [Exactly what to do]
FORMAT: [Exactly how to structure output]
CONSTRAINTS: [Exactly what to avoid]
EXAMPLES: [Exactly what good looks like]

Example for blog writing:

ROLE: You are a direct, no-fluff content writer
TASK: Write a 500-word blog intro on [topic]
FORMAT: Hook → Problem → Solution → CTA. 3 paragraphs max.
CONSTRAINTS: No corporate speak. No "in today's world". No metaphors.
EXAMPLES: [paste your best previous output here]

Reuse this template. Change only the [topic]. Consistency skyrockets.Image
Read 14 tweets
Jan 29
Holy shit... I just reverse-engineered how top AI engineers build agents.

They don't touch n8n's UI. They use ONE Claude prompt.

It generates complete workflows, logic trees, API connections, and error handling in seconds.

Here's the exact prompt: ↓ Image
THE MEGA PROMPT:

---

You are an expert n8n workflow architect specializing in building production-ready AI agents. I need you to design a complete n8n workflow for the following agent:

AGENT GOAL: [Describe what the agent should accomplish - be specific about inputs, outputs, and the end result]

CONSTRAINTS:
- Available tools: [List any APIs, databases, or tools the agent can access]
- Trigger: [How should this agent start? Webhook, schedule, manual, email, etc.]
- Expected volume: [How many times will this run? Daily, per hour, on-demand?]

YOUR TASK:
Build me a complete n8n workflow specification including:

1. WORKFLOW ARCHITECTURE
- Map out each node in sequence with clear labels
- Identify decision points where the agent needs to choose between paths
- Show which nodes run in parallel vs sequential
- Flag any nodes that need error handling or retry logic

2. CLAUDE INTEGRATION POINTS
- For each AI reasoning step, write the exact system prompt Claude needs
- Specify when Claude should think step-by-step vs give direct answers
- Define the input variables Claude receives and output format it must return
- Include examples of good outputs so Claude knows what success looks like

3. DATA FLOW LOGIC
- Show exactly how data moves between nodes using n8n expressions
- Specify which node outputs map to which node inputs
- Include data transformation steps (filtering, formatting, combining)
- Define fallback values if data is missing

4. ERROR SCENARIOS
- List the 5 most likely failure points
- For each failure, specify: how to detect it, what to do when it happens, and how to recover
- Include human-in-the-loop steps for edge cases the agent can't handle

5. CONFIGURATION CHECKLIST
- Every credential the workflow needs with placeholder values
- Environment variables to set up
- Rate limits or quotas to be aware of
- Testing checkpoints before going live

6. ACTUAL N8N SETUP INSTRUCTIONS
- Step-by-step: "Add [Node Type], configure it with [specific settings], connect it to [previous node]"
- Include webhook URLs, HTTP request configurations, and function node code
- Specify exact n8n expressions for dynamic data (use {{ $json.fieldName }} syntax)

7. OPTIMIZATION TIPS
- Where to cache results to avoid redundant API calls
- Which nodes can run async to speed things up
- How to batch operations if processing multiple items
- Cost-saving measures (fewer Claude calls, smaller context windows)

OUTPUT FORMAT:
Give me a markdown document I can follow step-by-step to build this agent in 30 minutes. Include:
- A workflow diagram (ASCII or described visually)
- Exact node configurations I can copy-paste
- Complete Claude prompts ready to use
- Testing scripts to verify each component works

Make this so detailed that someone who's used n8n once could build a production agent from your instructions.

IMPORTANT: Don't give me theory. Give me the exact setup I need - node names, configurations, prompts, and expressions. I want to copy-paste my way to a working agent.

---
Most people ask Claude: "how do I build an agent with n8n?"

And get generic bullshit about "first add nodes, then connect them."

This prompt forces Claude to become your senior automation engineer.

It doesn't explain concepts. It builds the actual architecture.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(