Hashim Mteuzi, PMP Profile picture
Aug 20 • 5 tweets • 1 min read • Read on X
Okay, let me try to break down Trump's tariff scam one more time. đź§µ
First off, tariffs aren’t a check from Beijing or Delhi. They’re a tax on U.S. importers, which get passed down the line.

That means you end up paying higher prices on groceries, furniture, appliances, etc.

Tariffs = a sales tax on households.
2/x
Second, $150B sounds big until you stack it against Trump’s own HR1 tax cuts. Those added $340B more debt every single year.

So even if tariffs hit $150–300B annually, they don’t even cover the yearly cost of his tax cuts for corporations & billionaires like him.
3/x
Third, calling this “debt reduction” is misleading. That money doesn’t erase the debt; it mostly goes to pay interest.

That simply means working class people pay higher prices so the government can cut checks to Wall Street investors and protect the wealthy class it serves.
4/x
So let’s be super clear: this is not about “reducing the debt.” It’s a con.

Your grocery bill goes up so billionaires and bondholders get paid.

Tariffs are a racket. A clear wealth extraction scheme that takes hard-earned money from working people to prop up the rich.

end/đź§µ

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Hashim Mteuzi, PMP

Hashim Mteuzi, PMP Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Mteuzi

Jul 30
Trump’s claim that Epstein “stole” Virginia Giuffre from his spa isn’t just false, it’s strategic.

Let’s set the record straight, because this is about more than sloppy phrasing.

It’s about shielding Ghislaine Maxwell, rewriting his role, and setting up a possible deal. 🧵
Giuffre (then Virginia Roberts) has stated repeatedly:
She was recruited by Maxwell at Mar-a-Lago’s spa—which Trump owned.

It wasn’t a kidnapping. It was a grooming operation disguised as a job opportunity. That’s how trafficking often works.
2/xPrince Andrew, Virginia Giuffre, and Ghislaine Maxwell.
Maxwell has been convicted for her role in Epstein’s child sex trafficking network.

Yet Trump keeps dodging her name—and now he’s shifting the story to paint Epstein as the lone predator.

Why erase the recruiter?
Why remove Mar-a-Lago from the narrative?
3/xGhislaine Maxwell and Donald Trump
Read 6 tweets
Jul 24
This isn’t just a scandal—it could be the biggest state-level cover-up in modern history.

- Trump told the public to “move on.”
- The DOJ said the case was closed.
- But Trump is in the files. The DOJ told him.
- The FBI secretly searched every doc for his name.

A Thread: đź§µImage
Image
Image
Image
In May 2025, Trump was privately informed that his name appears multiple times in the Epstein files.

Pam Bondi and senior DOJ officials briefed him in person. Days later, the DOJ issued an unsigned memo:
"No list exists. Case closed."

That sequence isn’t random.
It’s a red flag.Image
Image
But it gets worse.

Before the memo, the DOJ quietly ordered a massive FBI operation: over 1,000 staffers across multiple divisions working 24/7 shifts, all tasked with one thing:

Flag every reference to Trump in the Epstein files.

Let that sink in.Image
Image
Read 14 tweets
Jul 19
They weren’t just rich creeps.

Trump, Epstein, Casablancas, and Brunel were part of an organized, predatory network of pedophiles—using modeling contests, private dinners, and fake opportunities to prey on teenage girls.

Here’s how they worked together in plain sight. 🧵⬇️Image
Image
Image
Image
Let’s start with John Casablancas.
Founder of Elite Model Management.

Openly dated teenage models.
Ran “Look of the Year” contests worldwide—many girls were underage.

He admitted to sleeping with girls as young as 14.
That didn’t stop the parties—or the business.
2/xImage
Casablancas and Trump were close.

They co-hosted private dinners where models were made to walk across tables so Trump could “stick his head under their skirts.”

Casablancas bragged about letting Trump date his models.

Trump even sent Ivanka to him for modeling, at age 14.
3/xImage
Image
Image
Image
Read 13 tweets
Jul 14
Why do so many people suspect Donald Trump of being a pedophile?

Let’s walk through the documented history—his words, his actions, his associations.

None of this is theory. It’s all on the record.

BOOKMARK THIS THREAD đź§µImage
1/x Trump and Jeffrey Epstein

Trump called Epstein a “terrific guy” in 2002, adding:

“It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do—and many of them are on the younger side.”

They partied together for years. Epstein later said he was Trump’s “closest friend for 10 years.”
Image
2/X Flight Logs & Mar-a-Lago

Trump flew on Epstein’s plane at least seven times.

They were so close Epstein had unrestricted access to Mar-a-Lago—until they allegedly fell out over a real estate deal.

Not ethics. Not morality. Money.Image
Read 13 tweets
Jul 9
đź§µTHE POST-9/11 SECURITY SCAM

Let me take you back...

It’s December 2001. The world is still reeling.
A failed shoe bombing attempt makes headlines.

Weeks later, TSA starts making millions of us take off our shoes at the airport.

It felt strange, but we obeyed.

They said it was for our safety.
But what they really built was a $500 billion grift.

Now, in 2025, they’re quietly rolling it back—
Not because it was wrong.
But because the next phase of profit and control has already begun.

Here’s the story they don’t want told. ⬇️Image
Fear turned into fortune.

TSA’s budget in 2003? $827 million
TSA’s budget in 2025? $11.8 billion

That’s a 1,327% increase, totaling $260 billion in spending.

And that’s just the agency itself.

DHS also handed out $276 billion in security contracts to private firms.
Over half a trillion dollars—routed from public funds into private pockets.

All hidden by telling us it was for our “safety.”
2/xImage
Image
A gold rush for contractors.

Raytheon. Lockheed. Northrop Grumman.

The same companies profiting from war started showing up at your local airport—selling scanners, sensors, biometric ID systems.

These weren’t competitive deals.
They were guaranteed revenue streams, protected by procurement loopholes and cost-plus pricing.

Security became a business model.
And fear was the marketing strategy.
3/xImage
Read 5 tweets
Jun 29
They’re not just coming for immigrants.
They’re coming for us.

Trump’s EO on birthright citizenship revives Dred Scott logic—where being born here means nothing if your bloodline isn’t “approved.”

Here’s how this targets the citizenship of descendants of enslaved Africans: 🧵Image
Image
Image
1/x Birthright Citizenship Has Always Been a Shield for Black Americans

After the Civil War, the U.S. ratified the 14th Amendment specifically to overturn the Supreme Court’s Dred Scott decision, which said Black people could never be citizens of this country. The 14th made citizenship a right for all born on U.S. soil, regardless of race or ancestry. It was one of the only structural protections Black people had in a country built on our forced labor and legal exclusion. Without it, any hostile administration could decide we don’t belong.

Trump’s executive order weakens that shield. By redefining who qualifies as "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States, it inserts a new test: parental status. This change guts the guarantee that birth alone is enough. For Black Americans, whose ancestors were denied legal personhood and whose families fought generations for that citizenship, this is more than a policy shift. It’s a targeted rollback of the very legal floor that made our rights real. If this floor collapses, we fall further than most.Image
Image
2/x The Executive Order Quietly Creates a New Citizenship Test — and Black Folks Are Set Up to Fail

The order says you’re not a citizen at birth if your mother is undocumented or on a temporary visa and your father isn’t a citizen or green card holder. That means the government has created a two-parent immigration test to determine whether your birth counts. While this is framed as targeting new immigrants, the legal precedent it creates is much broader. It lays the groundwork for future citizenship to be tied to parental status, ancestry, or documentation history. That alone is dangerous.

But it’s especially dangerous for Black people. We know what happens when the state creates eligibility tests tied to documents: Black folks get excluded. This isn’t hypothetical. It’s what happened under Jim Crow with literacy tests, grandfather clauses, poll taxes, and more.

This new test isn’t about immigration enforcement. It’s about establishing a legal framework that makes citizenship conditional. And that framework almost always finds a way to trap us first.Image
Image
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(