Pope Leo's decision to live in the Apostolic Palace with a small community of his fellow Augustinians is a brilliant move and, IMO, indicates how he will combine continuity with his predecessor while, at the same time putting a fresh spin on it.
So Francis rejected the Apostolic Palace in what many perceived as a bit of showy poverty. Leo moves back in, but brings the simplicity and authenticity of Catholic religious life into the Apostolic Palace.
In doing so he affirms Francis' well intentioned move away from what many saw as the grandeur of the papacy but also affirms the tradition of living where the popes have always lived, but in apostolic simplicity of Augustinian religious life.
This not only shows that Leo is pretty smart and capable of thinking outside the box. It also indicates a truly Catholic approach: affirming what is good while positively and creatively correcting what may have been misleading or untrue. I like it, and it exhibits my favorite life changing dictum...
"A man is most often right in what he affirms and wrong in what he denies." So Francis was right in affirming apostolic simplicity. He was wrong in denying the apostolic palace. Leo cleverly affirms both. Neat.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I've been thinking a lot about the death penalty recently, and it seems to me...
That when the death penalty is accepted in a society that, implicitly, the members of that society operate with an underlying acceptance of revenge as an acceptable principle for justice.
Yes, I know the philosophical and theological arguments in favor of the death penalty assert that essentially it is an objective decision of the law to make a retributive sentence and that some crimes are of such severity that a death sentence is just and that this not revenge, but objective justice. However...
From Bishop Martin's liturgical letter:
"The use of a pall is helpful if flying insects are present and drawn to the sugar present in the wine. It is preferable that the pall only be placed over a chalice if such insects are present, leaving the chalice uncovered otherwise." Now this reminds me of a story...
In my days in the Church of England a holy old priest said he was celebrating Mass in a country church one summer morning and a wasp flew in through the open window.
The wasp buzzed about the altar and then to the priest's consternation it zoomed down directly into the already consecrated wine in the chalice and was swimming about.
What we should gather from Pope Leo's visit to Genazzano today:
At Genazzano just southeast of Rome is the ancient shrine of Our Lady of Good Counsel. Why is this significant?
First, the shrine has been in the hands of the Augustinian order since 1417. The shrine holds a miraculous image of the Madonna and has been a favored pilgrimage site of popes.
Various surveys have reported the astonishing lack of belief in the Real Presence among American Catholics. I'm dubious, and here's why:
Firstly, with any survey one wants to know what question was asked and who was surveyed.
Were church-going Catholics surveyed or cultural Catholics?--a "cultural Catholic" being someone who identifies as Catholic because their grandfather was Polish...