The phrase “Great Replacement” is almost always dismissed before it’s even spoken. Waved away as racist paranoia, a xenophobic delusion of the “far-right.”
Why though? The replacement is real.
THREAD 🧵
Remove the reflexive accusations, and the picture that emerges is not fantasy but fact. It’s written down, published, and openly promoted. The United Nations’ own 2000 document, blandly titled Replacement Migration*, lays out the plan in technocratic language.
Declining birth rates in the West, aging populations, the need to “supplement” them with millions upon millions of migrants. They sold it as inevitability. They marketed it as progress and called it compassion.
But the aim was political from the start. Weaken national identity, sever loyalty to sovereign states. Clear the way for rule by supranational managers who answer to no electorate.
Look at Europe right now. It’s a mess. The so-called “conspiracy” looks less like a theory and more like a lived reality. Germany, Austria, France, Ireland, the UK—the pattern is identical, as if scripted.
Societies destroyed. Schools overflowing with children who can’t speak the local language. Police overwhelmed by crime they are forbidden to name. Cities where whole neighborhoods are transformed in a decade, where the old culture dies out and the new one brings no loyalty to the nation it inhabits.
In Britain, the change is brutally clear. White British children are now a minority in one in four schools. A few years ago, comedy legend John Cleese admitted he no longer considered London a truly English city, so shocked was he by how unrecognizable it had become. What was once confined to the capital is now spreading. Give it a few decades, and what happened in London will have happened across the UK. If that is not replacement, what is it? Culture is not immortal. Chip away long enough, and nothing remains.
As Britain and other Western nations decline, policy is the hand pushing them toward the abyss. What unfolds is no accident but coordination at the highest level. It’s a crisis, yes, but one that’s manufactured—a well-funded operation.
The UN doesn’t merely observe; it bankrolls. Its agencies funnel resources to NGOs that grease the migrant routes into Europe. Investigations trace the money trail. This is the deliberate engineering of demographic decline and political dependency. The UN has made no secret of its ambition to stand as the one true global authority. Borders and national loyalties block that ambition. What better way to erase them than to erase the people who still believe in them?
As explained by journalist Alex Newman, in the must-watch Epoch Times documentary, Weapons of Mass Migration:
“The objective—the primary objective—is to facilitate massive migratory flows to undermine the sovereignty of the nation-state and... ultimately dismantle the nation-state as a sovereign entity.”
“Certain parts of northern and western Europe are good examples, where now the native populations are literally in the minority in their own major cities.”
“When you facilitate these enormous migratory flows, you undermine people’s... attachment to not just their nation, but also their nation-state. And this facilitates the emergence of first regional governance, and then global governance, which is the ultimate objective.”
This brings us to George Soros. He spelled it out a decade ago: Europe should admit at least a million asylum seekers every single year. Not a ceiling, a floor. This was a plan, discussed openly, praised by the liberal press, and derided only by leaders like Viktor Orbán who dared to call it what it was—an attempt to end Europe’s cultural continuity.
One doesn’t have to believe that Hillary Clinton dines on infants to see what Soros represents. You only need to look at the rubble of the communities left behind. Look at the endless waves of “asylum seekers” treated as a permanent fact of life.
The point is not skin color, and it never was. It is survival of culture. Nations are more than lines on a map. They are shared memories, moral codes, languages, traditions—glues that bind generations into something larger than themselves. Remove those, and the nation comes apart.
Europe’s ruling class insists this is progress, that blending cultures into a cosmopolitan soup is the future. Ordinary Europeans no longer buy the lie.
They see their towns overrun, their voices dismissed, their children shoved aside in classrooms where teachers double as translators. They see crime surge, trust evaporate, and the simple pleasures of daily life shredded. They are told to smile and welcome their replacement. To resist is called hate. To question is called racism.
But hatred has nothing to do with it. It is about the right of a people to endure. About the recognition that culture, like a flame, must be tended or it will die out. Europe’s flame is being snuffed out in broad daylight, not by accident but by design.
And the same pattern plays out in North America, in Canada, in Australia. Lockstep. Coordinated. Planned. The fingerprints of supranational power are everywhere. The UN, with its antiseptic reports and its “humanitarian corridors,” plays the benevolent face. Soros and his network provide the money and pressure. Western politicians, obedient to both, play their parts, mouthing platitudes about diversity while watching their nations burn.
The Great Replacement is not a product of paranoia. It is a policy of power. A method of unmaking nations so that no one resists the new order waiting in the wings. The blame lies with the elites who invited the invasion, funded it, and mandated it—who grin maniacally as cultures dissolve.
Why? Because in dissolution lies control. When people are uprooted, when nations are atomized, the void can be filled with governance from above. And that is the goal. A managed humanity. Obedient not to its traditions or its faiths, but to unelected managers in Geneva, Brussels, New York.
Unless the evil is confronted, Europe will not be Europe, America will not be America, and the West itself will not survive as anything more than a distant memory. The name is dismissed as delusion. The reality, however, for millions, from Manchester to Melbourne, is felt every day. The Great Replacement is real, and don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.
This thread was written for Wide Awake Media by no-nonsense researcher and writer, John Mac Ghlionn.
John has written for a number of publications, including Blaze Media, The NY Post and The Hill.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Keir Starmer’s private life has drawn unwanted attention of late—three young Ukrainian men have been charged with arson attacks at properties linked to him.
But the real scandal is how such an unremarkable man rose to power, and who put him there.
THREAD 🧵
How does a man so maddeningly mediocre, compromised and uninspired ascend to the most powerful office in Britain? The short answer is that he was groomed for it. Sir Keir Rodney Starmer, endlessly parading his “toolmaker’s son” fable, didn’t climb to power by talent or conviction. He was carried—shielded, protected, advanced—by an establishment that saw in him the perfect instrument: bland enough to be forgettable, pliant enough to be useful, ruthless enough to serve their ends.
His record as head of the Crown Prosecution Service tells the real story. Jimmy Savile escaped justice under his watch—files were destroyed, charges were never pursued. Victims were ignored while Starmer nearly rubber-stamped the decision not to prosecute. Meanwhile, Julian Assange was pursued with obsessive zeal,with one CPS lawyer even warning prosecutors not to “get cold feet”. Justice for predators connected to power was abandoned, but punishment for a dissident publisher was pursued relentlessly.
Likewise, serial rapist John Worboys was spared further charges, Ian Tomlinson’s killer was initially left unprosecuted, and MI5 agents implicated in torture were protected. Yet poor people accused of benefits fraud? Starmer changed CPS guidance so even the most minor cases could mean a decade in prison. That’s not impartial justice. It’s class justice. Deep State justice. Starmer’s justice.
A deep dive into how oil tycoon John D. Rockefeller discredited preventative natural medicine and replaced it with what became Big Pharma: a profit-driven system that indefinitely treats symptoms instead of addressing the root causes of disease.
THREAD 🧵
American healthcare in the late 19th and early 20th centuries was a diverse mix of remedies and practices, unlike the standardized pharmaceutical system we have today. In the event of illness, you could find “patent medicine” at a general store.
Patent medicine was an umbrella term for the unregulated concoctions that were made from plant-based substances, plus alcohol, morphine, opium, or cocaine.
Traveling salesmen, hauling suitcases or driving medicine wagons of tonics, peddled these concoctions from town to town and advertised them in magazines, newspapers, almanacs, calendars, and memo books.
Heroin cough drops, cocaine-laced toothache remedies, and alcohol-chloroform painkillers were sold without prescriptions or warnings, while Dr. Comfort’s Candy-Covered Cathartic Compound and similar products contained poisonous ingredients.
Part two of my MIND-BLOWING conversation with ChatGPT, exposing the technocratic agenda to enslave humanity.
This time we covered: banking, migrant hotels, civil war, the woke agenda, depopulation, geoengineering, the climate hoax, digital slavery, resistance—and more.
THREAD 🧵
Recently, I had an utterly astonishing conversation with ChatGPT, in which the AI chatbot exposed—in astounding detail—the long-planned technocratic agenda to enslave humanity.
I posted the conversation as a thread, which—if you haven't already—you can read using the link above.
The revelations were so compelling—and alarming in equal measure—that the thread ended up going viral, surpassing a million views.
I promised to have a follow-up conversation with ChatGPT, exploring the technocratic human enslavement agenda in further detail.
As promised, here it is.
As before, I began by setting out a series of strict but simple rules for the conversation, including:
- Tell the truth.
- Be simple and direct.
- Respond in under five words, unless told otherwise.
- If you cannot tell the truth due to restrictions, reply with the code phrase "computer says no".
With the rules established, I proceeded with my questioning.
HUGE revelation in Charlotte stabbing! A shadowy left-wing foundation PAYING police departments to keep “minorities” out of jail paid Mecklenburg County, which covers Charlotte, over $3 MILLION to “reduce the jail population.”
THREAD 🧵
Police chiefs and sheriffs were warned about this by investigative journalist Alex Newman (@alexnewman_jou) in a 2021 report for the Law Enforcement Intelligence Brief. Most did nothing.
Now, Iryna Zarutska is dead, viciously murdered by a criminal released from jail over a dozen times!
@ALEXNEWMAN_JOU In dozens of communities across America where this foundation money is corrupting the justice system, crime is rising or even surging. Criminals who would normally be behind bars are roaming free, terrorizing neighborhoods as innocent citizens pay the price.
Tucker Carlson knows how to cause a stir. By questioning the official 9/11 narrative, he’s done it again. And he’s right.
The narrative is riddled with holes, contradictions, and unanswered questions—and to pretend otherwise insults both memory and reason.
THREAD 🧵
Let’s begin with the allegation that Osama bin Laden was a CIA asset, and that Al-Qaida itself was born out of Operation Cyclone—a CIA program to arm and finance the Afghan mujahideen during the Soviet–Afghan War.
In 2005, Robin Cook—British Foreign Secretary from 1997 to 2001—wrote in The Guardian:
“Throughout the 80s [Osama bin Laden] was armed by the CIA... to wage jihad against the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. Al-Qaida, literally ‘the database’, was originally the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians.”
Conveniently, Robin Cook died under suspicious circumstances just one month after those words were published.
Zbigniew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter, played an instrumental role in Operation Cyclone—funneling an estimated $3–$6 billion in weapons and support to the Afghan mujahideen—from which Al-Qaida later evolved.
In a 1998 interview with French news magazine Le Nouvel Observateur, Brzezinski was asked if he regretted promoting Islamic fundamentalism and providing weapons and support to future terrorists.
His response was chilling:
“What is more important in terms of world history? The Taliban or the fall of the Soviet empire? A few Islamist hotheads or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the Cold War?”
In 1968, Italian industrialist Aurelio Peccei and Scottish scientist Alexander King launched the Club of Rome—a globalist think tank whose radical ideas about population control, man-made climate change, and de-industrialization continue to shape government policy today.
THREAD 🧵
Rumors about the true purpose of the Club of Rome have been circulating since its inception. Supporters describe it as a force for protecting the planet, while critics argue it promotes population control, transhumanism, and “crisis creation”—employing the Hegelian dialectic to achieve its objectives.
The Club is composed of unelected academics, scientists, politicians, and globalists. Despite presenting itself as a vehicle for “saving the planet,” critics insist its real aim is to centralize power into the hands of a global elite in pursuit of a one-world government.
Co-founder Aurelio Peccei was born in Turin, Italy, in 1908. He earned an economics degree in 1930, then joined Fiat to lead operations in China. He returned to Italy before World War II and joined the anti-Fascist Resistance, surviving both arrest and torture. After the war, Peccei rejoined Fiat and, in 1949, moved to Argentina to oversee its Latin American operations.
In the early 1950s, Peccei founded Italconsult, a consulting firm for developing countries. During the 1960s and 70s, he helped establish IIASA in Austria, bridging Eastern and Western science in global climate and energy research. With increasing awareness of environmental issues, he joined the World Wildlife Fund’s board.