Mark Roseman Profile picture
Aug 21 6 tweets 2 min read Read on X
For those who think "someone else" will step up to force politicians to do the right thing for our health system and for patients… forget it.

I keep hearing that doctors and other professionals should be counted on to take on this fight.

They can't. Here's why. 🧵
1. Most doctors believe in science, evidence, reality, and doing what's objectively best to help people. That makes it hard for them to understand political behaviour, which is about opinion, power, and influence… not facts. Many can't comprehend some politicians' motivations.
2. Doctors are used to being the smartest people in the room. And they often are… in some areas. But when it comes to others, they're novices, and many don't realize it. You only have to look at negotiations between govt and doctors to see areas where doctors are outsmarted.
3. Doctors are risk adverse, which is good when your health is at stake. But also when their own careers are at risk. With the govt takeover of professional colleges, they know that speaking out puts their livelihoods at risk. And they've seen the consequences of speaking out.
4. What about as a group? They're represented by Doctors of BC, a "member funded society." One that gets 2/3 of its funding directly from government, not its members. Doctors who've stepped up to bring change have been marginalized. They've learned what DoBC's priorities are.
Make no mistake, with the resources available, our health system could work so much better.

It's failed for political reasons. And that failure has been covered up by deliberate failings in transparency and accountability.

If that's to change, it's up to us to force change.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mark Roseman

Mark Roseman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @markroseman

May 27
We should congratulate the BC NDP for greatly improving access to primary care for patients in BC.

They've made it possible to get same-day access to a primary care provider who can see you, order lab tests, refer you to specialists, and much more.
How did they do it?

Not through their own UPCCs, which are impossible to get into. Or through people's own family doctors, who take weeks to get into for 5min appts. And not connecting people to docs, as people languish on the Health Connect Registry for years.
No, they've made it possible to access same-day primary care by allowing people to pay for it.

At companies like Care2Talk and many others, you can put down your money, say $125, and get an appointment. And get the tests, referrals, or whatever else you need. Image
Read 6 tweets
Aug 12, 2024
1/20 🧵BC NDP bet big on Urgent and Primary Care Centres (UPCCs). Critics say they're expensive, horribly managed, and don't deliver what they promised.

I reviewed the govt's own data, obtained via FOI.

The critics are right.

Strap in. Full details at takingaction.ca/upcc/
Image
2/20 If you're unfamiliar with healthcare alphabet soup…

UPCC = Urgent and Primary Care Centre
FOI = Freedom of Information
FP = family physician
NP = nurse practitioner
FFS = fee-for-service (pay model)
LFP = longitudinal family practice (pay model)
MSP = Medical Services Plan Image
3/20 I previously shared stats for the first UPCC. It's one of the poorest performers. But it's not alone.

Here, I'll share data for ALL the UPCCs. Some do pretty well. But on average, it's still bad.

I hope you'll explore the original data and draw your own conclusions. Image
Read 20 tweets
Jun 24, 2024
1/6 🧵BC NDP bet big on Urgent and Primary Care Centres (UPCCs). Critics say they're expensive, horribly managed, and don't deliver what they promised.

I reviewed the government's own data, obtained via FOI.
The critics are right.

Here's just a taste of what I found. Image
2/6 Here's costs and visits at the Westshore UPCC (WUPCC) for one year (Apr/2022-Mar/2023).

Works out to $216 per UPCC “visit” on average.

That's SIX TIMES a Fee-For-Service family physician (FP) visit.

An LFP visit would need to be nearly 90min to match (not happening!). Image
3/6 High fixed costs and low patient volumes mean high overhead.

Per visit, WUPCC OVERHEAD alone is OVER DOUBLE what FP's bill for an ENTIRE VISIT!

Even scarier, overhead is DOUBLE what was budgeted!

As the first UPCC, they should have figured this out by now. Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(