🚨Enhanced Rock Weathering (#ERW) could remove up to 700 Mt CO₂ by 2070 in the UK if quarry production scales 5–10×.
Larger extraction sites boost efficiency but raise major social, logistical & policy challenges.
A new @CommsEarth study models the trade-offs.🧵1/11
2/ ERW involves spreading crushed silicate rocks on croplands to capture CO₂.
While previous studies examined its chemistry & agronomic benefits, this work focuses on the supply chain: can the UK sustainably scale rock extraction to meet net-zero needs?
3/ The authors model deployment from 2025–2070 under 3 supply scenarios:
Low (32 Mt rock/yr), medium (97 Mt rock/yr) & high rock (166 Mt rock/yr) demand with variations in whether expansion relies on active, inactive, or new quarries.
4/ Results show that concentrating production in fewer, much larger quarries, ~20x the size of today’s average, improves performance.
Optimisation through quarry location & timing raises net #CDR by ~20%, cuts transport demand by ~60% & reduces the no. of operating sites by 4x.
5/ Depending on the pathway, cumulative removal by 2070 ranges from 175 Mt CO₂ (low scenario) to over 700 Mt (high scenario).
That is equivalent to annual removals of 6–27 Mt by mid-century, covering roughly a quarter of the UK’s projected CDR requirement for 2050.
6/ Yet these gains are tempered by efficiency trade-offs. As deployment scales up, average CDR/t of rock declines, since the best quarry–cropland pairs are used 1st.
Smaller caps & reliance on new quarries diffuse production, increasing transport distances & lowering efficiency
7/ Logistics are pivotal.
Average haul distances stretch to 180–240km, far above the current UK aggregate average of 45km.
Northern Ireland & Sco emerge as key suppliers with much of their output shipped to croplands in England, demanding expanded freight & port infrastructure
8/ The env & social footprint is significant.
Quarry expansion could convert ~33Kha of land by 2070, mainly grassland & woodland.
These impacts r geographically concentrated, meaning a handful of communities would bear heavy burdens, while benefits of CDR remain national
9/ Public acceptance is therefore crucial.
Dust, noise, and truck traffic often provoke strong local opposition, and just 7% of local authorities could host 2/3rd of the extraction.
Mechanisms such as benefit-sharing or restoration funds may be needed to ensure legitimacy.
10/ Policy frameworks r currently ill-equipped for such rapid scaling.
Quarry permitting cycles often span 5–15yr, with many existing consents expiring by 2040.
Expanding current sites r more feasible than opening new ones, but both will demand approvals & long-term planning.
The study concludes that ERW could play a major role in UK climate strategy, but only if it is treated as a socio-technical system: quarry logistics, infrastructure, environmental safeguards & community acceptance must all be aligned.
🚨A new CSIRO-led study finds Australia can achieve net-zero emissions cost-effectively by 2050 if it acts early.
Rapid decarbonisation of electricity, scaled #CarbonRemoval, and strategic land offsets are central to success.
Details🧵1/9
2/ The research adapts the IEA’s global net-zero scenarios to Australia’s economy using an integrated economic–energy model.
It compares a Rapid Decarbonisation pathway, consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C, with a Stated Policies path leading to ~2.6 °C by 2100.
3/ Electricity emerges as cornerstone. In rapid pathway, coal is 85% retired by 2030 & fully phased out by 2035.
Renewables supply ~90% of generation by 2030, cutting emissions intensity to ~15% of 2020 levels & enabling deeper decarbonisation across various sectors.
📰 Here's your round-up of top #CarbonDioxideRemoval News / Developments from this week (04 August - 10 August 2025):
🔗:
🧵0/18
Evero’s Ince biomass plant will be converted into the UK’s first BECCS site by 2029, capturing 217,000 t CO₂/year, processing 170,000 t waste wood, and powering 100,000+ homes.
🚨New research out on US public perceptions of #SolarGeoengineering:
More Americans oppose SRM research than support it, and 1 in 5 believe government-led atmospheric modification is already underway.
DETAILS🧵1/11
2/ Using 64 interviews, 10 focus groups, and a survey of 3,076 Americans, the study found strong initial rejection of solar radiation modification (#SRM) as a research priority.
Skepticism, fear of unintended consequences, and concern over “playing God” were dominant themes.
3/ Only 32.6% supported further SRM research. A notable 43.7% opposed it. For comparison, support was ~80% in similar studies from a decade ago. Enthusiastic support is now virtually nonexistent in qualitative responses.
📰 Here's your round-up of top #CarbonDioxideRemoval News / Developments from this week (28 July - 03 August 2025):
🔗:
🧵0/21
Germany’s 2026 draft budget allocated €111 million for negative emissions in 2026 and a further €320 million in subsequent years. A new federal department has also been set up to focus on carbon removal.
🚨How does #SolarGeoengineering affect air pollution & public health?
New study using a cutting-edge Earth system model shows that #SAI has only modest effects on PM₂.₅ & ozone-related mortality & these impacts are mostly due to climate shifts, not aerosol deposition.🧵1/8
2/ Using CESM2-WACCM6 simulations across three scenarios (SSP2-4.5 baseline, ARISE-SAI-1.5, ARISE-SAI-1.0), the study quantifies global mortality attributable to ozone (O₃) & fine particulate matter (PM₂.₅) under future SAI deployment targeting 1.5°C and 1.0°C warming levels.
3/ Findings:
In the ARISE-SAI-1.5 scenario, maintaining global mean temp at 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels via SAI results in:
- 1.26% reduction in ozone-related mortality
- 0.86% increase in PM₂.₅-related mortality during 2060–2069, relative to SSP2-4.5.