Students For Liberty Profile picture
Aug 22 • 17 tweets • 7 min read • Read on X
In 1990, a Black Democratic legislator who ran Jesse Jackson's campaigns twice implemented Milton Friedman's free-market education ideas.

This is how liberty can win through unlikely alliances. đź§µ Image
Meet Polly Williams and Milton Friedman. On paper, they had nothing in common.

Friedman: Nobel Prize-winning economist, architect of free-market theory.

Williams: Former welfare recipient, inner-city Milwaukee representative, civil rights activist.

Yet together, they revolutionized American education.Image
Image
In 1955, Friedman published "The Role of Government in Education," arguing that parents should control education dollars through vouchers.

Competition would improve schools, he claimed. But for 35 years, it remained academic theory.

Williams would make it reality, though for completely different reasons.Image
Williams wasn't interested in economic theory.

She was furious about forced busing that sent Black children on 45-minute rides across Milwaukee while white kids stayed in neighborhood schools.

"The burden of desegregation was put on Black children," she said. "Our children were being taken out of our community."Image
When the education establishment told frustrated parents "What do parents know? They're not educated," Williams had enough.

She wanted power in the hands of parents, especially low-income families who "always get left out" when programs claim to help them but benefit others instead.Image
Williams formed what she called "The Unholy Alliance."

Out of 99 Assembly members, she needed 50 votes.

Her own Democratic Party opposed her.

The teachers' unions opposed her.

Liberal establishment opposed her.

So she worked with conservative Republicans who supported Friedman's market approach.Image
The coalition made strategic sense. Republicans got to pilot free-market education reform.

Williams got to empower low-income Black families trapped in failing schools.

Both sides focused on the outcome they wanted rather than ideological purity about who they worked with. Image
Williams insisted on three non-negotiable principles:

Only low-income families could qualify.

Parents—not bureaucrats—would choose schools.

Participating schools couldn't cherry-pick students.

This wasn't about helping the wealthy; it was about giving poor families the same choices rich families already had.Image
The opposition tried everything to stop them.

They proposed a fake choice program where the school district would select students based on "seven negative criteria"—essentially designing it to fail.

Williams rallied 200 parents to testify for three hours. Her colleagues couldn't vote against those parents.Image
The Milwaukee Parental Choice Program launched with 1,000 students receiving $2,500 vouchers for private schools.

It was the first modern school choice program in America.

Not because of abstract economic theory, but because a grassroots leader found practical allies to solve real problems.Image
Williams understood something many liberty advocates miss: "Labels do not tell you much about me.

I'm not a liberal; I believe in what works."

She worked with Jack Kemp and Newt Gingrich because they shared her goal of empowering families, not because they shared her party affiliation.Image
When asked if her Republican allies were sincere about helping Black families, Williams replied: "I don't care. I think they are, but they don't have to be.

They just have to sincerely want to push my agenda." Results mattered more than motivations. Image
The lesson for today's liberty advocates is clear: Stop demanding ideological purity and start building coalitions around shared outcomes.

Williams proved that a welfare recipient and a free-market economist can both want to empower individuals—just for different reasons. Image
Whether you're fighting campus speech codes, occupational licensing, or administrative overreach, remember Williams' approach.

Find people who want the same practical outcomes you do, even if they arrive there from different philosophical starting points. Image
True liberty advances when we focus on empowering individuals rather than winning partisan battles.

Sometimes the best ally for free-market solutions is someone who's never read Hayek but knows firsthand what it means to be trapped by government systems. Image
Williams changed American education forever by understanding what many miss: politics is about building coalitions, not finding perfect ideological matches.

She got results by finding common ground with people who shared her goal of empowering families. Image
Ready to learn how to navigate hostile campus environments without compromising your principles? The College Survival Kit teaches you to debate professors, connect with allies, and turn setbacks into opportunities—just like Polly Williams did in Wisconsin.

Get your free copy: go.studentsforliberty.org/college-surviv…Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Students For Liberty

Students For Liberty Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sfliberty

Aug 20
Imagine being so beloved that working-class families hung your portrait in their homes. Not because you were a celebrity, but because you actually cut their taxes and fought for their freedom.

Meet William Ewart Gladstone: history's most popular classical liberal đź§µImage
This wasn't some academic theorist or ivory tower philosopher.

Gladstone was a four-time Prime Minister who dominated British politics for over half a century.

And here's what made him different: he made liberty cool, moral, and undeniably popular.Image
Picture this: Gladstone didn't just talk about free trade. He abolished over 1,000 tariffs. That's 95% of Britain's protectionist policies, gone.

He didn't just critique big government. He slashed the income tax from 10% to 1.25%. And he wasn't satisfied until he could eliminate it entirely.Image
Read 10 tweets
Aug 19
Brilliant economists are saying Hayek was right about the past, but AI changes the game.

"The calculation problem? Solved. Modern supercomputers can handle what Soviet planners couldn't."

Here's why even smart people are missing something fundamental. đź§µImage
This isn't new thinking. It's the return of an ancient conceit.

Soviet planners once believed they could organize society "scientifically." No more waste, no unemployment, just rational experts allocating resources perfectly.

They called it scientific socialism. We know how that ended.Image
What these AI evangelists miss is what Friedrich Hayek understood decades ago: the problem was never computational power.

The problem is information itself.

When the price of tin rises, you don't need to know why. You just need to know that tin is now more valuable elsewhere.Image
Read 10 tweets
Aug 18
A 16th-century Spanish priest wrote the first systematic defense of sound money, identified inflation as theft, and justified killing tyrants who imposed taxes without consent.

Kings banned his books. Executioners burned them. The Inquisition tried to erase them from history.

But this Jesuit monk had developed the core insights of Austrian economics 250 years before Austria even existed. đź§µImage
This is the story of Juan de Mariana, the original "politically incorrect" libertarian who out-Rothbarded Rothbard, out-Misesed Mises, and challenged the entire power structure of his time.

While most people think free-market economics started with Adam Smith, the real intellectual revolution began in the lecture halls of 16th-century Salamanca.Image
Born in 1536 as the illegitimate son of a canon, Mariana joined the Jesuits at sixteen and quickly became one of Europe's most brilliant minds. He taught at Rome, Sicily, and the Sorbonne, the Harvard of its day.

But brilliance wasn't enough for Mariana. He wanted to change the world.Image
Read 14 tweets
Aug 18
Milton Friedman was visiting China when officials showed him workers building a canal with shovels to create as many jobs as possible.

Friedman replied: "Then why not give them spoons?"

Sounds logical, right? More workers = better economy? Here's the logic politicians miss. đź§µ Image
The Chinese officials missed the point entirely. They weren't hired to create jobs; they were hired to build a canal.

Creating jobs is easy. Creating value is hard.

We could destroy every farm tractor in America tomorrow. That would create millions of new farm jobs overnight. But would anyone call that progress?Image
Here's what economists know but politicians ignore: job destruction is often the engine of human progress.

A hundred years ago, 40% of Americans worked on farms. Today it's under 2%. Agricultural output has exploded thanks to mechanization and innovation.

What happened to all those "lost" farm jobs?Image
Read 10 tweets
Aug 16
In August 1939, Britain and France were desperately trying to stop Hitler.

They had one last hope: convince Stalin to join them against Nazi Germany. Instead, Stalin chose to ally with the nazis.

This wasn't an accident. It was ideological sympathy. đź§µ Image
The scene in Moscow was surreal.

British and French envoys were begging Stalin for an alliance, but talks stalled over Poland accepting Soviet troops and the Baltic states falling into Stalin's sphere.

Stalin was stupefied by British refusal. How could British imperialists, who had seized one quarter of the earth, deny him the right to annex former Russian possessions?Image
Meanwhile, Hitler was growing anxious about a potential Soviet-Western alliance.

In May 1939, Stalin made a telling move: he replaced Jewish foreign minister Maxim Litvinov with Vyacheslav Molotov, whose main trait was never disagreeing with Stalin. This wasn't coincidence. It was preparation for Nazi talks.Image
Read 18 tweets
Aug 14
The Soviet Union promised equality, prosperity, and democracy for all.

— 7 million died in the Holodomor famine.
— 6 million people forcibly deported.
— 800,000 died during deportation.
— 40% lived in poverty.

Don't be fooled—life for regular people in the USSR was awful. 🧵Image
We're told constantly that socialism "just hasn't been tried correctly yet."

But the USSR wasn't an accident. It was socialism's most ambitious experiment.

And the results? A masterclass in how utopian promises become dystopian realities.Image
Stalin's Five-Year Plan gave the Soviet state control over Ukraine's agriculture. Ukrainian farmers were forced to sell their grain, land, livestock, and tools to the government.

They were enslaved on collective farms called "kolkhozes."

The result? Mass starvation from central planning's inevitable failures.Image
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(