Gotcha 2: this starving person clearly has a pre-existing condition. Not real starvation!
(This one makes me crazy)
Why it’s BS: People with complicating ailments are always more susceptible to earlier starvation.
This is a SIGN of famine onset, not a rebuttal of it.
Gotcha 3: there is food in the market! Some restaurant is open!
Why it’s BS: Famine isn't the universal absence of food; it's when adequate food is out of reach for much of the population. In every famine ever, some people could afford food even while others couldn’t.
...trope 3 cont'd
In Gaza, food prices have spiked massively. That tells you that a) some food must still be present, but b) it is priced wildly far beyond what most people can afford.
Why it's BS (2): Israel has supplied NO credible evidence of substantial Hamas theft of UN or NGO food aid.
In fact, ex US ambassador Jack Lew (hardly an Israel skeptic) writes that the Israelis *never* raised these concerns with him - even privately. foreignaffairs.com/middle-east/ho…
Gotcha 5: There's food but the UN refuses to distribute it! (Israel is now importing rightwing influencers to promote this lie)
Why it's BS: Israel tightly controls every UN truck that moves within Gaza. Their own policies prevent the UN from delivering! apnews.com/article/aid-ga…
Gotcha 6: You've been warning of famine since last year - you’re just crying wolf.
Why it’s BS: Each time things spiraled last year, Israel pulled back from the tipping point. (We wrote a whole report on this)
And by keeping many Gazans teetering back and forth at the edge of famine since spring 2024, Israeli policy has demolished whatever coping mechanisms people had left.
That policy laid the fuse, and the blockade in March/April set it alight.
Gotcha 7: The IPC changed the goalposts! They used a different malnutrition standard for Gaza!
Why it's BS: This just shows a basic ignorance of famine thresholds.
The last IPC report used a 15% MUAC threshold for famine-level malnutrition - in line with IPC guidance.
MUAC is often used if good weight-for-height data cannot be obtained. The MUAC threshold is lower than WfH because they manifest at different levels within the same pop'n.
(The Free Beacon did a whole piece using this claim to debunk the last IPC analysis - and the entire thing rests on this armchair misreading of IPC guidance) ipcinfo.org/fileadmin/user…
Bottom line: all of these tropes are classic famine-denial disinfo.
As Alex de Waal wrote here, we see this around most famines, especially as the situation approaches visible collapse.
The world's famine alert system is warning us – in the starkest possible terms – that any remaining window to avert mass starvation deaths in Gaza is about to close.
As a longtime humanitarian who has battled famines and hunger crises, I fear that starvation in Gaza has now passed the tipping point and we are going to see mass-scale starvation mortality.
A thread on famine momentum, famine response, and what it means for Gaza today.
The latest reporting shows telltale signs of rapidly accelerating mortality - the kind of classic famine scenario we know from places like Sudan or Somalia.
Barring a massive reversal of Israeli policy, there is a little standing in the way of total collapse.
Throughout last year Gaza ebbed and flowed at the brink of famine, but never passed the tipping point.
Israeli aid obstruction kept Palestinians perpetually underfed but always relented just enough to avoid mass hunger mortality, as we wrote last Sept: refugeesinternational.org/reports-briefs…
The whole episode says a lot about the sincerity of whoever is pulling the strings at GHF.
First instinct is to put out a gaslighting press release denying the massacre reports, while pretending that whatever happens outside their perimeter has nothing to do with them.
Only after *another* massacre (which they also initially try to debunk) does GHF belatedly acknowledge that...maybe...there are some issues with an aid model that forces huge crowds of hungry people to cross long distances and then clusters them along IDF force positions.