Jay P. Greene Profile picture
Aug 22 6 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Columbia, Brown, & Penn have settled. Cornell and Harvard are reported to be next. UCLA, Northwestern, George Mason & others may soon follow. Some academics are mystified by why their leaders would settle or attribute it to cowardice. But settling makes sense. Here's why. 🧵1/ Image
1) They're guilty. The evidence is overwhelming that universities failed to enforce rules to protect Jewish students. The fact that they have been engaging in racial discrimination by granting preferences in admissions and hiring is even more clear. Settling is smart. 2/
2) The agreements reached to date contain nothing that infringes on academic freedom & autonomy, so there is nothing to fear from settling. Academics like to scare each other with ghost stories about Trump taking over their classes, but the agreements do nothing like this. 3/
3) Settlements help trustees regain control over their universities from groups of radical faculty who have hijacked their institutions for political agendas. Ironically, Trump is helping trustees institute organizational reforms they wanted but were unable to do before. 4/
4) Universities need to repair decades of reputational damage or they will continue to face aggressive governmental action and spending cuts. It's hard for them to recognize, but they've been cast as the villain. Aggressive government action against villains is popular. 5/
5) Many in academia misunderstand the political situation and therefore advocate "resistance," believing that their problems will go away if they can just outlast Trump. But their liabilities are only growing over time. Settling is smarter. 6/end dailysignal.com/2025/08/22/why…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jay P. Greene

Jay P. Greene Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jaypgreene

May 19
Medicine has a serious antisemitism problem. It especially has a problem among doctors, and a lot of that problem is concentrated among doctors educated overseas. @PeerReReview & I examined the profiles of 702 antisemites identified by @StopAntisemites. Here is what we found 🧵1/ Image
Doctors were almost 26 times overrepresented in the list of antisemites relative to their prevalence in the workforce. And half of those Jew-hating doctors received their medical degrees abroad. 2/ tabletmag.com/sections/news/…
The challenge posed by foreign-trained doctors is that they arrive in the U.S. after having largely completed their moral formation, sometimes in political systems that explicitly promote antisemitism in their schools. The antisemitism they openly display in the U.S. may have been considered appropriate or even enlightened in their home countries. 3/
Read 8 tweets
Mar 31
The study that claims black doctors save the lives of black babies must be cursed. It's results have been mis-described. It has failed to be replicated by other researchers. And now a FOIA reveals that the authors hid results that undermined their desired "narrative."🧵1/ Image
In a @wsj oped, @tedfrank documented that Justice Jackson incorrectly claimed in her dissent to the SC decision banning affirmative action that this study showed that having a black doctor "doubles" the odds that a black newborn will survive. 2/ wsj.com/opinion/justic…Image
Later, a Harvard economist and a @ManhattanInst fellow attempted to replicate the racial concordance study but found that the effect disappeared once an obvious control for newborns having very low weight was added. 3/ pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pn…
Read 5 tweets
Mar 11
Last fall I had a piece in @tabletmag on how universities with a critical mass of international students have hosted many more anti-Israel protests than universities where foreign enrollment is more moderate. The article profiled Mahmoud Khalil, who ICE is seeking to deport.🧵1/ Image
At selective universities, about a third of total enrollment comes from abroad. At Columbia it is almost half. Once foreign enrollment reaches a certain level, these universities cease to be American institutions, raising questions about why taxpayers heavily subsidize them. 2/ Image
If more than a third of university enrollment comes from abroad, you are bound to get a Mahmoud Khalil. While the vast majority of intl students make no trouble, at a high enough level even a small fraction of international students can foment significant disruption. 3/ Image
Read 4 tweets
Feb 10
Over the weekend, the NIH announced that it would be cutting overhead rates on federal research grants from an average of about 60% to 15%. Not surprisingly, there were howls of protest from university staff and their fellow-travelers in the media. 🧵1/ Image
The biggest whopper came from the WashPo with the headline: “NIH cuts billions of dollars in biomedical funding, effective immediately.” A more accurate headline would have been, “NIH cuts billions in administrative expenses, allowing more to be spent on biomedical research.” 2/
Defenders of 60% overhead rates insist that they absolutely need this money to cover things like the costs of buildings, labs, & electricity. However, waving your hands does not prove that you need 60 cents for every dollar spent on research to cover those costs. 3/
Read 9 tweets
Oct 31, 2024
My new piece in @Telegraph: The @nytimes ran a very negative piece on @umich's DEI efforts. The response to that article by the university's head of DEI proves exactly why DEI is counter-productive. 🧵1/telegraph.co.uk/us/comment/202…
The New York Times Magazine just ran a lengthy profile of DEI efforts at the University of Michigan and discovered that, despite an enormous investment, the campus has “become less inclusive”, that “students and faculty members reported a less positive campus climate”, and that “students were less likely to interact with people of a different race or religion or with different politics”. 2/ nytimes.com/2024/10/16/mag…
Rather than take stock of these failures, Tabbye Chavous, Michigan’s Vice Provost for Equity & Inclusion and Chief Diversity Officer, has responded by denouncing the article as sexist and politically biased. In her rebuttal, Chavous demonstrates why DEI bureaucrats claiming to fight for harmony and against bigotry are producing the exact opposite. 3/
Read 8 tweets
Oct 16, 2024
When @james_d_paul and I first released our @heritage research critical of DEI bureaucracies in 2021, we received a wave of negative reaction. It's gratifying to see our concerns about DEI validated in this excellent @nytimes piece by @nickconfessore 🧵1/ nytimes.com/2024/10/16/mag…
We published a series of reports on the issue that became the DEI Trilogy. First was Diversity University, then Equity Elementary, and finally Inclusion Delusion. You can read Diversity University here. 2/ heritage.org/education/repo…
And then Equity Elementary, which focused on how DEI bureaucracies were spreading from universities into K-12 education. 3/ heritage.org/education/repo…
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(