Richard Hanania Profile picture
Aug 22, 2025 17 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Ghislaine Maxwell transcripts released! See here for thread on the most interesting parts. 1/n
Ghislaine is asked whether Epstein ever received money from any intelligence agency, including Mossad. She replies that not as far as she knows and she would be surprised if he did. Image
Epstein started taking testosterone in the late 1990s. But he was not on any other substances. Image
Image
Epstein would get bored with masseuses and always wanted to find new ones. She says she never thought anyone giving massages was under 18. Image
Image
She disputes claims that she recruited one of Epstein’s accusers while at Mar-a-Lago, but concedes she did sometimes meet spa workers and might have casually asked if they wanted to work, without remembering specifics. Image
Image
Maxwell on Epstein's relationship with Trump: "I don't know how they met, and I don't know how they became friends. I certainly saw them together and I remember the few times I observed them together, but they were friendly. I mean, they seemed friendly." Image
Maxwell: "I actually never saw the President in any type of massage setting. I never witnessed the President in any inappropriate setting in any way. The President was never inappropriate with anybody. In the times that I was with him, he was a gentleman in all respects."

Now you know why she got transferred to a lower security prison.Image
Bill Clinton also never got a massage. Image
Image
She is exasperated with how stupid this all is. "So that narrative that was created and then built upon, and it just mushroomed into what – basically this is like a Salem witch trial. People have gone and lost their minds for this thing." Image
Ghislaine on Epstein: "He's not some – they've made him into this – he's not that interesting. He's a disgusting guy who did terrible things to young kids. Image
Gislaine: "A man wants sexual favors, he will find that. They didn't have to come to Epstein for that." Image
She doesn't know anything about Epstein's relationship with Ehud Barak. Image
"I never, at any time, set Andrew up to have relations with her or any other human being ever." Image
Ghislaine says that Epstein told her he had issues having sex. But she thinks he was lying, because he masturbated and liked to get blowjobs. Image
Image
Image
Image
Ghislaine said that she never told any woman how to pleasure Epstein. If he needed someone to know, "he clearly was able to explain himself." Image
Ghislaine denies she was paid $30 million to recruit girls for Epstein. Image
In sum, this whole thing is very dumb. The entire Epstein story is a stupid moral panic with nothing behind it. Leftist MeToo hysteria combined with rightist pedo hysteria. Watch @mtracey and I discuss.

If you fell for this, rethink everything. richardhanania.com/p/the-inverted…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Richard Hanania

Richard Hanania Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RichardHanania

Mar 16
Paul Ehrlich has passed away, and I wanted to see whether he was as bad as his quotes and short clips suggest. Surely, there might be some nuance or careful thought in his worldview. Nobody is that purely evil.

So I picked up The Population Bomb and started reading.

It turns out, he's even worse than you think!

I’m putting together a thread below.

Quotes taken out of context don't get at the degree to which he is consistently evil and misanthropic. He had an entire system that he pursued in which human life was constantly denigrated and devalued, with an eye toward elimination. You’re left wondering what you’re even reducing human population for, since every form of life seems to be not worth living.

Some people are racist and just hate poor and brown people. Some hate the rich. Paul Ehrlich doesn't discriminate. He wants you not to exist if he can get away with it. But if he can't stop you from living, he wants you to have a much worse quality of life.

Ehrlich has a plan for both advanced and poor countries. He has blueprints for entire regions of the globe.

Humans do not have agency in Ehrlich’s world. They’re simple consumers of resources, with no ability to create, better their circumstances, or exert individual agency to make the world a better place, except to the extent that they ensure fellow humans no longer exist.

You might find all of this depressing. But I’ve found reading Ehrlich invigorating. It is a reminder of how much evil there is in the world. Recall that Ehrlich was not some guy in his room putting out diatribes. He was a professor at Stanford, a highly decorated scientist, and one of the most prominent public intellectuals of his generation. While reading Ehrlich today, know that he has intellectual descendants in the form of degrowthers and other environmental extremists, along with anti-capitalists who don’t understand the basis of prosperity and prioritize redistributing wealth over all else.
First of all, the cover. Children are starving as you're reading this. Even worse, more are being born! The existence of more humans is supposed to hit you harder than starvation. I like the title of the earlier book. "The End of Affluence." Another brilliant prediction. Image
Here's the entire prologue where his famous predictions are made about mass starvation. It's only two pages, you can read the whole thing. He uses the prologue to make predictions that would soon be discredited and call for coercion, and denounces treating "the symptoms of the cancer of population growth." Ehrlich doesn't want to hear about how you might have a plan to improve people's lives. You're just treating symptoms! He starts with a demand that fewer humans is the only option worth considering.Image
Image
Read 24 tweets
Mar 2
Why is the US so much wealthier than Europe?

If there's one statistic that explains it, it's this: Americans are ten times more likely than Germans to be fired in any given year.

I argue that America is wealthier because it has weaker labor protections. richardhanania.com/p/labor-freedo…
US isn't a free market paradise compared to Europe. But labor law stands out. California has high taxes and other left-wing policies. But Silicon Valley would be impossible in Europe. You can trace the exact ways in which its business model based on innovation is illegal. Image
American companies often have to make large severance payments to fired workers. In much of Europe, these are mandated by law and much larger. And large German companies can't even choose who to lay off. They must factor in tenure and things like family obligations. Image
Read 6 tweets
Feb 9
“The elites never told us being fat was bad for you” is one of the stranger right wing beliefs.
Fascinating insight into how the minds of rightists work.

"I saw one fat positivity magazine cover" becomes "Everyone was lying to us about being fat."

There is no ability to separate things that make you mad on the internet from what's significant in real life. Image
Hey guys remember when THE MACHINE told you to be fat?
Read 13 tweets
Oct 8, 2025
This guy was sued by his own firm for falsely inflating his role as “Head of Macro,” misusing confidential information to promote his own fund, breaching debt obligations, and defaming the firm to investors.

Yes, it's unsurprising that Trump brought him into the party.
He eventually admitted sharing confidential information and paid the costs of the lawsuit. Image
He called himself "Head of Macro," a position that didn't exist. The company says he was hired as a Research Analyst and then fired for poor performance. Fishback has now reinvented himself as a MAGA influencer. Image
Read 6 tweets
Sep 26, 2025
How to explain Indian hate?

The truth is simpler than you think.

Many Americans dislike dark skin. But they make an exception if you're good at football, and Indians are bad at sports.

They'll make us a poorer country for that.

Yes, it's that stupid. richardhanania.com/p/indians-are-…
There's a human preference for light skin. It shows up almost everywhere and predates colonialism. Indians and blacks are the darkest groups Americans are exposed to or interact with in any significant degree. Image
But blacks, in addition to the historical guilt, have traits many Americans like. They're good at sports, good with women, and charming enough to be actors and entertainers. Image
Read 13 tweets
Aug 30, 2025
US-India relationship is being harmed because Pakistan is more willing to kiss up to Trump, and Modi has too much pride to nominate him for the Nobel Peace Prize when he didn’t do anything.

Modi is now going to meet Putin and Xi in China.

I can’t believe it’s this stupid. Image
Mr. Trump contends that he used trade as leverage to get the two sides to stop fighting. After these enticements and warnings, he said, “all of a sudden they said, ‘I think we will stop’” the fighting.

India denies that.Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(