Before we mock “shrimp on treadmills” or “marbles in cats,” remember: we once studied Gila monster spit and it led a drug that’s now reshaping modern medicine.
How many influencers & politicians perpetuating memes actually read the studies? Probably none.
So I’ll do it for you.
Let’s start with the shrimp.
Yes, scientists really put shrimp on a tiny treadmill and no it wasn’t to see how fast a shrimp can run.
The science behind it is surprisingly important.
The study looked at how shrimp respond to environmental stress and infection - key concerns in marine biology and aquaculture.
The treadmill was a way to let scientists measure how oxygen use and immune function changed when shrimp experienced stress.
The NSF grants led to 20+ publications - with the treadmill used in just 4. However they provided important insights to help safeguard aquaculture, protect ecosystem health, and adapt to climate-driven changes in our oceans.
Now the cats.
This one made major headlines: “The government put marbles up cats’ rear ends and electroshocked them.” And yes - it sounds awful.
But let’s break down the real science that had a legitimate goal: restoring bowel control after spinal cord injury.
Funded by the Department of Defense, this research aimed to help veterans with paralysis - many of whom struggle with bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury.
In the peer-reviewed study, anesthetized cats had small glass marbles placed in their rectums.
Researchers then stimulated spinal nerves (S2 sacral roots) to induce defecation to explore neuromodulation therapies for people with paralysis.
And it worked.
They found that stimulating at 7 Hz reliably activated bowel movement - proof-of-concept for spinal stimulation devices that could one day help patients regain control of basic functions.
Like many medical breakthroughs, it starts with animal studies - all under carefully controlled, ethically reviewed protocols.
Bottom line is this: whether or not you agree with the projects: sound bites are easy, understanding the science takes time and effort.
But if we keep mocking what we don’t understand, we risk defunding the very discoveries that could save lives.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“Make no mistake, if Congress enacts the President’s skinny budget, the consequences for the future of our nation would be catastrophic. The United States will no longer be in the global race for R&D leadership—we will have lost it.”
“Economic benefits will accrue to other nations. We will lose the ability to set standards, influence priorities, attract and retain talent, and determine the outcomes for the health, prosperity and security of our nation.”
“America is at a crossroads. It is up to our federal lawmakers to reaffirm their long-standing bipartisan support for science and technology investment by rejecting this budget.” - Sudip Parikh, CEO of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and Executive Publisher of the Science family of journals
Wow. The Trump administration’s proposed FY2026 budget calls for a 1/3 cut to HHS and a 40% cut to NIH - with an unprecedented reduction in funding from $47B to $27B and collapsing 27 institutes into 8. More below.
Among the NIH institutes marked for elimination:
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institute for Nursing Research, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.
Entire research areas, from child development to environmental risks, would disappear.
The CDC would be cut by 44%, from $9.2B to $5.2B. Chronic disease programs, including heart disease, diabetes, obesity, and smoking cessation, would be eliminated. The agency’s domestic HIV response would also be shut down.
I've noticed alot of people don’t realize how deeply medical innovation in this country depends on the NIH. From cancer immunotherapy to vaccines to obesity drugs like GLP-1s: it all starts with public funding. Here's a quick primer on the treatment pipeline in case helpful.
NIH doesn’t make drugs. It funds the foundational science that makes them possible - discovering how diseases work, what molecules matter, and where to intervene. It’s the riskiest part of the pipeline, long before anything is profitable.
When that early-stage research shows promise, it can be licensed out, usually through a university tech transfer office, to a startup or biotech company. That’s when private sector investment kicks in: preclinical work, trials, FDA approval (which contrary to belief is a long and arduous process)
“I’m running out of time. I know that.”- Mark Chambers, 66, facing bile duct cancer and hoping for access to a clinical trial. His words stopped me cold. This is what NIH cuts actually mean. Not politics. People.
I’ve spent years working to accelerate cancer innovation. I know how fragile and how powerful the pipeline from research to treatment really is. When you delay science, you delay survival.
A recent article highlights how NIH scientists made a significant breakthrough in a cancer treatment for Mark’s exact cancer. But then came the layoffs, funding cuts, stalled projects, trials delayed.
Know that when you have cancer - every minute counts.
There’s an enormous amount of disinformation flying around about NIH right now, so let’s clear a few things up. The NIH is not Big Pharma. It doesn’t make drugs, it doesn’t set public health agendas, and it doesn’t profit from your illness.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is the world’s largest public funder of biomedical research. It funds science to understand how our bodies work and how diseases develop-not to push products or profit.
NIH does have policy roles-but they’re about how research is conducted (like data sharing, ethics, and innovation), not how the government responds to a public health crisis. NIH doesn’t issue mandates or set population-wide health policy.
Distilling the potential impact of science based on a title is so dangerous. Some of the biggest biomedical breakthroughs came from research that, at first glance, seemed ‘pointless or unrelated. Here are a few that I'm sure might have caused an uproar in the headlines:
Glowing jellyfish: Seemed random until it led to Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP), now a game-changer in cancer research, neuroscience, & vaccine development (almost everyone I know has used GFP in their research) Oh, and it won a Nobel Prize.
Naked mole rats: Why? because it turns out they’re practically immune to cancer and NIH-funded research uncovered the mechanisms behind that, and are now studying how to apply it to humans.