Pep Guardiola constantly talks about how much faith & trust he puts in his coaching staff.
The influence of Pep Ljinders on City's defensive idea backs up those words.
But City are not built to press like Klopp's Liverpool.
Many foolishly overlooked it vs Wolves...
THREAD! 🚨
City's new Ljinders and Klopp-esque pressing schemes are clear.
The idea is firmly zonal in comparison to the man-to-man defensive approach City had in recent years without Ljinders.
In the narrow 4-3-3, the idea is to force the opposition to one flank & trap them on the side.
For example, Spurs play to one side which sees Bobb invert to manage the far-side centre back leaving Spence as the spare man at left back.
However, with the way City press, they block the option to find Spence, get pressure on the ball and use Nico to screen the defensive line.
This is the same defensive idea Liverpool used under Klopp.
It is a special defensive approach because it applies huge pressure to the opposition's build-up whilst maintaining a +1 in the defensive line.
We also saw Bobb inverting onto the LCB with Rico jumping from right back.
Liverpool used this same rotation many times under Klopp, either directly from the opposition goal kick or on the switch of play.
When timed correctly, it maintains optimal pressure on the ball if the opposition try and switch the play to find the spare man (Spence for Spurs).
However, Pep's City are not Klopp's Liverpool, especially in 25/26.
City started today's game with Aït-Nouri, Rico Lewis, Cherki, and Bobb in positions that Robertson, Trent, Henderson, and Salah started in.
Lightweight technicians versus 4 of the best pressers in the game.
Effective high pressing is not always possible because the idea is zonal-oriented.
For example, a #6 can drop into the first line (which was a tactic Thomas Frank cleverly employed), the fullback can be pinned which leaves a spare man at fullback or at centre back vs the winger.
Combine that lack of pressure on the ball with Ljinders' insistence on holding a high line to play an offside trap and HUGE issues begin to arise.
Not to forget how City are vulnerable physically to cover more than one player at a time, to win duels or to manage transitions.
Because of these issues it means City have to live low at times, but their idea is not built for this in any way.
Pep is not like Arteta or Frank, for example, who coaches his team within an inch of their lives in every phase.
His teams are not built to live in this moment.
When you are not coached here, you will suffer when you lack total dominance with the ball or lack pressure on the ball defensively.
I wrote an entire article about how the 4-0 win versus Wolves was more concerning than positive.
This clip sums it up.
City's season is reliant on Pep's ability to pick teams that can defend in consistently competitive ways.
That includes managing defensive transitions, covering large spaces, winning duels, & defending more than one player as part of the zonal schemes.
If not, City will suffer.
However, do not take this thread as nothing but criticism of Guardiola and Ljinders.
Remember, the tactics are special.
With the ball, they're always top. Without it, they are like Klopp's Liverpool.
But it is the balance in the team that is the issue. Up to Pep to solve it 🛑
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Defending against teams who use a box midfield or a 3-2 build-up shape in open play.
Liverpool only press with 4 against Palace's 5.
Good teams manipulate this to get time on the ball before playing vertically through Liverpool's block 👇
Arne Slot's idea in this moment is to trap the opposition to one side whilst leaving the far-side opponent unmarked.
This can work, on occasion, and it often works from situations like goal kicks because Liverpool can position themselves where they want from restart moments.
But, in open play, the opposition can often use the overload to their advantage, even more so if they get the goalkeeper involved to create a 6v4.
Simple switches of play or short & sharp combination play amongst the 3-2 shape can get guys like Wharton facing forwards with time.
Xabi Alonso has created the most tactically complete Real Madrid that I have ever seen.
4-2-4 build-up, 3-2-5 attack, man-to-man pressing from the goal kick, & most importantly Madrid are getting effective pressure on the ball in open play!
A breakdown of the new-look Madrid 👇
Alonso has implemented some 🔝 in-possession dynamics.
A positional idea but fluidity/freedom is encouraged within the framework.
For example, Tchouaméni (one of the most intelligent players alive) has taken up a Kroos-esque role in the left half space with Carreras pushing on.
With Tchouaméni dropping outside the shape, he becomes hard to pick up within the opposition's press but it also creates another number higher on the left hand-side of Madrid's attack.
So, instead of attacking with only 3 in a triangle, Tchouaméni makes it a quartet.
Newcastle-Barcelona is another clear example of why you need to actually watch games as opposed to seeking narratives through X.
Newcastle could have been 3-0 up inside 30 minutes & finished the game with more xG even though they often failed to get shots off.
Barca suffered 👇
Newcastle primarily played direct to use their superior physicality to bully Barca (often via restarts), but they also had some superb routines to bypass Barca's aggressive press.
Here, Martín jumps, Trippier sets inside, Elanga comes short, Gordon receives 1v1.
TOP automatism.
Another one.
Barca jump man-to-man, Livramento plays around the corner into the feet of Joelinton, and Newcastle are in a great position to find the space in behind Barca's offside trap.
Plus, when they did find the space beyond (often through Elanga), they were not clinical.
Thomas Frank and Spurs main problem in the 4-3-3 👇
The idea is to create a 3v2 in the first line against a 4-4-2, whether that be with the #6 dropping low or staying in the #6.
But the wide triangles have 2 wide with 1 inside.
Hard to combine like that.
Low AND high width means your team plays in straight lines.
What is the winger meant to do here?
Spence passes to Simons, Pepe back-presses to cut the angle off to Spence, and Simons is stuck with his back to goal with a defender behind AND in front of him.
He loses the ball..
This was a consistent theme for Spurs on both sides.
Even if the fullbacks wants to play in behind for the winger it is much more difficult to play straight balls beyond the defensive line than it is to play an angled one.
Aside from Fulham's goal kicks where United could lock on man-to-man, Ruben Amorim’s defensive idea prevented United from getting reliable pressure on the ball in the game.
As the game wore on, United got even worse defensively.
R. Amorim has to improve.
Post-match analysis 👇
Marco Silva played a 3-1-6 shape with Fulham’s #9 and #10 pinning United’s centre backs and their #8’s overloading the midfield two outside the block.
United's wingbacks were also consistently pinned which prevented them from getting out to Fulham's fullbacks when they were low.
United also struggled to build out from the back and consistently kicked long because of the ever-lasting issues with the centre back inverted into the #6.
This can work because it creates 2nd ball situations with United's great forwards in close proximity, but it invites chaos.
Arsenal beat Leeds 5-0 yet all I can see is a team that have not fully clicked.
The 1st half was flat. Arsenal lacked creativity in open play.
I want more.
Although Eze has not even debuted yet, his importance is already extremely clear.
Below, I break it all down.
THREAD! 🚨
Arsenal were too flat for my liking against Leeds.
They exerted control with the ball thanks to Arteta's usual dynamics with Raya providing a +1, Rice and Zubimendi dropping into the first line, Ødegaard dropping from high to low, and the wide triangles being as dynamic as ever.
We also saw Zubimendi interchange positionally with Ødegaard when he dropped deep which makes Arsenal even more dynamic and difficult to press.
Also, defensively, Arteta's team were as well-drilled as ever as they pressed with Ødegaard leading centrally or with Saka inverted.