T. Greer Profile picture
Aug 24 9 tweets 3 min read Read on X
These are extremely good textbooks.

Pedagogically unique--very different from most mathematics texts.

If you come from a humanist background or otherwise worry that you don't "get" math, I strongly recommend these. Image
Image
I also recommend them if you passed through these classes without ever feeling like you understood, at a deeper level, why you were doing the manipulations you were doing. Braver will fix that.
The key to the book are carefully scaffolded problem sets not designed to test knowledge so much as to lead the reader/problem solver to discover truths themselves. Some of his best problems will be something like "10. Now go explain this concept to another human being."
Free excerpts available at the author's website: bravernewmath.com
I believe Braver was a St. John's tutor -- that college where they study mathematics and science by reading Euclid and Newton.

This book is not that, but it clearly informs his approach.
Though he does not come out an say it outright, he clearly presents the standard calc/pre-calc material in a way that matches the historical development of the concepts involved.

There is also far more geometry involved than standard pre-calc books.
If you are completely new to these topic I would recommend supplementing it with these books, which are much more hand-holdy and include details on some problem types Braver doesn't cover. Image
Image
Image
Braver also has a linear algebra book but I have not gotten there yet, so cannot recommend from personal experience.

It seems to follow the same philosophy as these earlier books (geometric explanations when possible, sense of intuition informed by history of math). Image
I don't think this style of textbook is for everyone (and because he sometimes teaches things in a weird order you will struggle to find online lectures that match).

But this style really worked for me. I think it is a bit criminal that these books are not better known.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with T. Greer

T. Greer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Scholars_Stage

Aug 22
To be fair my thread does not engage with the new piece so much as with Kang's broader ouvre.

The two connect in the new piece's implicit answer to a key question: If China is stronger than the United States how do you expect it will behave?
Implicit in the piece is that the best model for this future China is either periods of Chinese weakness in more recent history or to its relationship with other neoconfucian powers when itself was a strong neoconfucian empire.
My thread explains why the second precedent is no convincing to me; the first just strikes me as obviously unwise.
Read 45 tweets
Aug 21
I think the time has come for me to write my take on @daveckang's entire research ouvre--its strengths and the limitations I find in its central arguments.

I do think that his new piece in IO really rests on ideas and assumptions of this earlier work, even if they are not cited.
Essentially I think all of these books, and the many articles that precede them, are variations on a central theme -- a thesis about Chinese statecraft that extends back several thousand years but is rooted in concerns about the present. Image
Image
Image
Image
The concern with the present is this: Kang is worried, and has been worried for two decades, about the possibility of war between America and China.
Read 81 tweets
Aug 19
Tell me if I read this paper wrong. It does not disprove the claim that industrialization depended on cotton grown by slaves.

Rather, advances the claim that there would have been even *greater* economic growth had it depended on free labor instead of slave labor for cotton.
It seems like the claim "absent slavery industrialization and capitalism would have gone chugging along just fine, thank you, and probably would have grown faster" seems different to me than "slavery did not play a decisive role in American/British industrialization."
Maybe there is a motte bailey thing here, though each side has its own motte and its own bailey. One side wants to claim that industrial capitalism could have only been created via slavery. This is wrong.
Read 5 tweets
Aug 16
I have a very different and somewhat romantic take on this question.

First though a map that shows you just how close to the border and far away from everything else Beijing was. Image
One of the takeaways from this book’s section of the Ming Dyansty was just, for lack of a better term, how hard core the Ming officialdom could be. Image
The Ming is just full of stories of these Confucian officials standing up to emperors knowing full well it meant they would be killed for doing so. Real Christians being fed to the lions energy.
Read 9 tweets
Aug 16
NEW ESSAY: Did Taiwan "Lose Trump?" Image
Two weeks ago Christian Whiton, who served in the first Trump admin State Department, published an essay for @DominoTheoryMag that went viral in Taiwan.

Its title: "How Taiwan Lost Trump." Image
The essay went *so* viral, in fact, that the Taiwanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs published a press release rebutting it Image
Read 25 tweets
Aug 2
I have asked this question on this platform several times over the last two years—usually not in reference to vibes but hard statistics, which support the idea that women have become the main (American) world travelers.

I am dissatisfied with the Twitterati answers.

Thread.
Before I get into these answers a preliminary note. This topic makes many men defensive. It probably should. Decline in willingness to travel is a decline in appetite for adventure. I think that’s bad. We can do better.
A lot of men feel the weight of a culture that berates and demeans them—that sees both their success and their failures as a problem. In this context any argument that we should widen male horizons is taken as an attack on the American man.
Read 54 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(