Just got round to watching Mario Draghi's speech in Rimini in the original Italian. It is easily the most important speech on Europe so far this year and I hope someone (@GillesGressani?) publishes it in English and other EU languages soon.
Some highlights:
- 1/20 Draghi draws a stark line where others (indeed, some in Brussels) prefer to fudge: between the EU as an economic regulator and the EU as a geopolitical power
- 2/20 He casts doubt on current under-coordinated and unstrategic defence splurges: "We have been pushed by [the US] to increase military spending [...] but in ways that probably do not reflect Europe's interests"
- 3/20 Draghi describes Europe as, essentially, a "spectator" where recent foreign policy events - from the Donbas to the Red Sea to the Caspian - are concerned
- 4/20 Draghi confronts the rise of populism in Europe, but asserts: "it's important to ask what the real object of this scepticism is" (and casts doubt on whether its fundamental targets are really European values like democracy, freedom, independence, sovereignty, equality)
- 5/20 He identifies three distinct shifts:
faith in markets -> industrial policy
rules-based-order -> military and geoeconomic power
limited states -> a new statism
- 6/20 Really important, this: Draghi brushes aside EU household gods. "we must not try to extrapolate past achievements to the future: [they] were actually responses to the specific challenges of that time and tell us little about our ability to address those facing us today."
- 7/20 Draghi notes that the EU's adaptation to the earlier, neoliberal era came naturally - going with the grain of a project built around opening markets, but that the challenges of today are fundamentally different. Spot-on observation.
- 8/20 He stresses that while EU's first decades could draw on memories of war & the goodwill of strong economic growth, those have both dried up (correct, but for my money this was the weakest part of his speech: as the experience in central and eastern Europe is v different).
- 9/20 Draghi killer stat 1: if EU reduced internal market barriers to level of US, productivity growth would hit 7% over 7 years (compared with current 2%).
- 10/20 Draghi killer stat 2: for all that Europe is spending more on defence, it is wasting vast sums of that investment. EU internal barriers amount to a 64% tariff on machinery and a 95% tariff on metals.
- 11/20 The result: "slower tenders, higher costs, and increased purchases from suppliers outside the EU... all because of obstacles we impose on ourselves"
- 12/20 Draghi argues that Europe cannot simply sit back as: "The United States and China openly use their control over strategic resources and technologies to gain concessions"
- 13/20 Draghi killer stat 3: while US investment in chips focuses on scale (projects from $30 to $65 billion), European investment is fragmented (typically targeting projects between $2 and $3 billion).
- 14/20 Draghi killer stat 4: EU highly unlikely to meet its target of increasing its global market share in chips from 10% today to at least 20% in 2030.
- 15/20 Plenty of European leaders are good at outlining the above problems. A difference is that Draghi is proposing solutions proportional to the challenge.
- 16/20 Draghi solution: 1: a "28th" legal regime for projects of common European interest and their joint financing
- 17/20 Draghi solution 2: a clear distinction between good and bad debt, as "only forms of common debt can support large-scale European projects that insufficient, fragmented national efforts would never be able to implement." 🎯
- 18/20 Draghi solution 3: a different European attitude. From hopelessness to faith in change; from despair at the future to confidence (NextGenerationEU, anyone?); from declinism to solutions; from crisis management to long-term vision
- 19/20 A dash of optimism: Draghi notes that for all of Europe's self-imposed brakes, "European firms are adopting next-generation digital technologies, including AI, at a pace comparable to the US". Imagine Europe with the brakes off.
- 20/20 Citing the Commission, Draghi sets a yardstick for European investments in the future: €1.2 trillion per year.
Daunting? Yes
Doubtful? Yes
Absolutely necessary? Also yes
Draghi concludes with his most radical message: one of European agency. "We can change the trajectory of our continent."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Germany may not be quite ready for its first "Quadrell" (four-way debate between chancellor candidates of CDU/CSU, SPD, Greens and AfD). But the TV complex in Berlin-Adlershof certainly seems to be:
Like last week's "Duell", the "Quadrell" debate starts with asylum and migration.
Merz hits back at JD Vance attack on German "firewall" against far-right. "I won't be told by a US vice president whom I have to speak to here in Germany. I accepted US election result... and I expect US government to do the same." Says he told Vance this in private in Munich.
1/ Europe at #MSC2025 looked like deer in Trump administration's headlights. How have we got this far without a concrete European plan for Ukraine to put on table? How is there *still* no proper consensus among major EU governments (+UK) on how far Europe is willing to step up?
2/ Part of the explanation came from (some) European speakers themselves: all-too-familiar homilies about "taking responsibility" and "shared values", incrementalism and wait-and-see on policy, and credulous reports of a more constructive US tone behind closed doors.
3/ Not always helped, it must be said, by some US usual suspects who come to Munich every year preaching continuity atlanticism and, frankly, deserve some of the blame for many years of European wishful thinking:
2/10 Lab inherits dire Europe legacy. Not just Brexit per se but squandered trust (conduct of exit talks, breaching withdrawal deal) plus under-appreciated factor of severed relationships & networks of mutual understanding. Windsor Framework helped but didn't change fundamentals.
3/10 UK simply not a first-order priority in most EU capitals. Emphatic, broad consensus that UK is a third country and, to the extent that it seeks change in relationship, the “demandeur” - including in the upcoming review of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement.
Just got back from a week of reporting in Turkey ahead of its general election on May 14, meeting figures from all the main political parties as well as trade unions & 🇹🇷 civil society.
Some thoughts on probably the most important election in the world this year:
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has governed the country for two decades now, first as prime minister (2003-2014) and since then as president (2014-today). He has remade Turkey and its place in the world.
Erdoğan has replaced a pluralistic parliamentary system with an autocratic presidential one; a pro-European foreign policy with a “neo-Ottoman” one; and a secular Turkish order with a more explicitly religious one. Hagia Sophia, a museum since 1935, became a mosque again in 2020.
“Europe” is fundamentally not a peace project, but a post-empire project (and that’s OK).
@TimothyDSnyder’s central observation about the continent’s modern history has never been so relevant:
Lots of really interesting & thoughtful comments in the replies to this, many critical of @TimothyDSnyder's argument about the nature of the European project. For what it’s worth, the above clip is just a brief dip into it; he makes it at much greater length and depth elsewhere.
For example: his 2018 book The Road to Unfreedom (especially Chapter 3: Integration or Empire), this op-ed politico.eu/article/europe… and this lecture: .
Wild, this: early this morning 3,000 police officers raided 130+ homes across Germany and made 25 arrests linked to a far-right coup plot. Conspirators said to include the aristocrat Prince Heinrich XIII, a former AfD MP & a former Bundeswehr commander.
Of the 52 suspects several have military backgrounds and are suspected of stashing weapons. The group had set up a political "Council" and a military wing tasked with seizing power, which had considered storming the Bundestag and taking MPs hostage.
Close to the extremist Reichsbürger scene ("Reich citizens" who do not recognise federal republic), the group had even designated a shadow cabinet, with Heinrich XIII as head of state and former AfD MP & judge (!) Malsack-Winkemann as justice minister.