We've talked before about how the Big Beautiful Wealth Transfer to the Rich bill is great for the megawealthy and bad for ordinary Americans who have to worry about paying rent, putting food on the table, and whether they can afford to go to the doctor.
We already have a colossal gap between the very richest and an ever shrinking middle class and a struggling working class. The BBB is going to make the gap even wider.
A study released today from the National Bureau of Economic Research shows that the tax breaks extended by the BBB reduce what the wealthiest Americans pay in taxes. The effective tax rate for the billionaires on the Forbes 400 list is 23.8 percent.
For the richest 100 it's 22 percent. The effective tax rate for Americans as a whole is 30 percent. What constitutes your "fair share" and what constitutes the "fair share" for billionaires is neither fair nor shared.
In 1982, those on the Forbes 400 list had wealth equal to 2 percent of America's gross domestic product. In 2025, the Forbes 400 folks have wealth equal to 20 percent of GDP.
Trickle down has been great for those who were supposed to do the trickling but seem to have experienced a financial prostate problem that's limited their downward monetary flow.
On a side note — Something ain't right with the world when 26 people have as much wealth as 3,800,000,000 (half the world's population) combined.
But back to America. Here's another example. Elon Musk's SpaceX is valued at $350 billion (Elon owns 44%), yet it doesn't appear that it's paid any federal income tax since its founding in 2002 and it says that it doesn't expect to pay any federal income tax for years to come.
SpaceX derives nearly 85 percent of its revenue from federal government contracts paid for by your tax dollars, so you paying taxes is good for Elon and his company not paying taxes is also good for Elon.
Some say I'm trying to start class warfare. No, the class war started 40+ years ago, I'm just choosing sides. And I'm not saying we need to rob from the rich to give to the poor; I'm saying we need to stop the rich stop stealing from the poor.
My views on taxes and spending are the same as they are on the conduct of party politics ... it's time to unstack the deck and make them fair.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“No funds appropriated herein may be used to pay, support, or reimburse, either directly or indirectly, Stephen Miller, or to support any activity or program that Stephen Miller directs, consults, or advises, without the prior authorization of Congress.”
Every appropriation must originate in the House of Representatives. Under the Constitution, neither the Senate nor the White House can make funds available for any purpose; the Constitution gives that power solely to the House.
Defunding Stephen Miller is just one example of what we can do to rein in an out of control White House if we win a majority in the House in 2026.
We’ve talked about the impact the $1 trillion cut to Medicaid will have on working class and poor families in Western NC and on rural healthcare. Well, hold onto your MAGA hat and your Trump bible, according to Senator Ron Johnson, more cuts are coming.
Johnson says the Trump White House and Republican Party leaders assured him that if he’d go along with the Big Bad Wealth Transfer to the Rich Bill they’d support consideration of another bill later this year to totally eliminate Medicaid expansion and cut an additional …
… $313 billion from healthcare for working class and poor families. That’s right, if you’re struggling to keep your head above water Republicans consider you a deadbeat who should pull yourself up by your bootstraps as they snatch the boots off your feet …
“The cruelty of these cuts is matched only by their stupidity. Medicaid beneficiaries will lose, but so will the rest of us. The cost of care that is no longer reimbursed by Medicaid will instead be borne by hospitals and passed …
… onto paying patients, only at higher levels, because delayed treatment is more expensive. When rural hospitals close, everyone nearby loses. Hospitals like the one where my daughters practice can no longer accept emergencies by air because those beds are occupied by …
… patients with chronic diseases and no place to go.
Because of the congressional instinct for political survival, the Medicaid cuts are backloaded beyond the 2026 midterms. Cynicism may have a silver lining. As more people realize what is coming, there is time to alter …
The Federal Insurance Contributions Act (better known as FICA) is a 7.65% tax on earnings that fund Social Security and Medicare. You may have read recently that the Social Security Trust Fund is being depleted faster than previously estimated …
… and payments to Social Security recipients will have to be reduced in a few years unless something is done to shore up Social Security.
If you earn $7.25 an hour — the federal minimum wage — and work 40 hours a week, 52 weeks a year, you earn $15,800 a year and 100% of your $15,800 is subject to FICA taxes and is automatically deducted from your paycheck.
Fred Smith, the founder of FedEx, died over the weekend. A passage from his obituary and 2 charts from today’s papers illustrate the fallacy of Republican Party economics.
From Fred Smith’s obituary:
“The Times reported that, thanks to the corporate tax cuts Mr. Trump signed into law, which FedEx had lobbied for, the company’s tax bill plunged to zero, from $1.5 billion. Mr. Smith had said that businesses like FedEx would respond to the windfall …”
“… with major new investments, yet FedEx reduced its capital expenditures and increased its spending on stock buybacks.”
As another Republican administration sends America into a war in the Middle East and as Republican legislators look for deeper social program cuts to add to the Big Bad Wealth Transfer to the Rich Bill, let’s examine a couple of budget matters.
Trump proposed a military budget that for the first time exceeds $1 trillion. Despite years and years of spending more on our military than Russia, China, and Iran combined, we’re warned year after year that we’ve got to keep spending more in order to keep up with our enemies.
So, if we continually spend far more than our adversaries on our military then why aren’t we way far ahead of them militarily? The answer is the same as the answer for why we spend far more on healthcare than other countries do yet we have far more people …