Moe Davis (U.S. Air Force, Retired) Profile picture
Aug 25 11 tweets 2 min read Read on X
We've talked before about how the Big Beautiful Wealth Transfer to the Rich bill is great for the megawealthy and bad for ordinary Americans who have to worry about paying rent, putting food on the table, and whether they can afford to go to the doctor.
We already have a colossal gap between the very richest and an ever shrinking middle class and a struggling working class. The BBB is going to make the gap even wider.
A study released today from the National Bureau of Economic Research shows that the tax breaks extended by the BBB reduce what the wealthiest Americans pay in taxes. The effective tax rate for the billionaires on the Forbes 400 list is 23.8 percent. Image
For the richest 100 it's 22 percent. The effective tax rate for Americans as a whole is 30 percent. What constitutes your "fair share" and what constitutes the "fair share" for billionaires is neither fair nor shared.
In 1982, those on the Forbes 400 list had wealth equal to 2 percent of America's gross domestic product. In 2025, the Forbes 400 folks have wealth equal to 20 percent of GDP.
Trickle down has been great for those who were supposed to do the trickling but seem to have experienced a financial prostate problem that's limited their downward monetary flow.
On a side note — Something ain't right with the world when 26 people have as much wealth as 3,800,000,000 (half the world's population) combined.
But back to America. Here's another example. Elon Musk's SpaceX is valued at $350 billion (Elon owns 44%), yet it doesn't appear that it's paid any federal income tax since its founding in 2002 and it says that it doesn't expect to pay any federal income tax for years to come. Image
SpaceX derives nearly 85 percent of its revenue from federal government contracts paid for by your tax dollars, so you paying taxes is good for Elon and his company not paying taxes is also good for Elon.
Some say I'm trying to start class warfare. No, the class war started 40+ years ago, I'm just choosing sides. And I'm not saying we need to rob from the rich to give to the poor; I'm saying we need to stop the rich stop stealing from the poor.
My views on taxes and spending are the same as they are on the conduct of party politics ... it's time to unstack the deck and make them fair.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Moe Davis (U.S. Air Force, Retired)

Moe Davis (U.S. Air Force, Retired) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ColMoeDavis

Jul 13
“No funds appropriated herein may be used to pay, support, or reimburse, either directly or indirectly, Stephen Miller, or to support any activity or program that Stephen Miller directs, consults, or advises, without the prior authorization of Congress.” Image
Every appropriation must originate in the House of Representatives. Under the Constitution, neither the Senate nor the White House can make funds available for any purpose; the Constitution gives that power solely to the House.
Defunding Stephen Miller is just one example of what we can do to rein in an out of control White House if we win a majority in the House in 2026.
Read 5 tweets
Jul 11
We’ve talked about the impact the $1 trillion cut to Medicaid will have on working class and poor families in Western NC and on rural healthcare. Well, hold onto your MAGA hat and your Trump bible, according to Senator Ron Johnson, more cuts are coming.

politico.com/live-updates/2…
Johnson says the Trump White House and Republican Party leaders assured him that if he’d go along with the Big Bad Wealth Transfer to the Rich Bill they’d support consideration of another bill later this year to totally eliminate Medicaid expansion and cut an additional …
… $313 billion from healthcare for working class and poor families. That’s right, if you’re struggling to keep your head above water Republicans consider you a deadbeat who should pull yourself up by your bootstraps as they snatch the boots off your feet …
Read 7 tweets
Jul 8
Former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers:

“The cruelty of these cuts is matched only by their stupidity. Medicaid beneficiaries will lose, but so will the rest of us. The cost of care that is no longer reimbursed by Medicaid will instead be borne by hospitals and passed …
… onto paying patients, only at higher levels, because delayed treatment is more expensive. When rural hospitals close, everyone nearby loses. Hospitals like the one where my daughters practice can no longer accept emergencies by air because those beds are occupied by …
… patients with chronic diseases and no place to go.

Because of the congressional instinct for political survival, the Medicaid cuts are backloaded beyond the 2026 midterms. Cynicism may have a silver lining. As more people realize what is coming, there is time to alter …
Read 10 tweets
Jun 26
The Federal Insurance Contributions Act (better known as FICA) is a 7.65% tax on earnings that fund Social Security and Medicare. You may have read recently that the Social Security Trust Fund is being depleted faster than previously estimated …
… and payments to Social Security recipients will have to be reduced in a few years unless something is done to shore up Social Security.
If you earn $7.25 an hour — the federal minimum wage — and work 40 hours a week, 52 weeks a year, you earn $15,800 a year and 100% of your $15,800 is subject to FICA taxes and is automatically deducted from your paycheck.
Read 9 tweets
Jun 23
Fred Smith, the founder of FedEx, died over the weekend. A passage from his obituary and 2 charts from today’s papers illustrate the fallacy of Republican Party economics.

From Fred Smith’s obituary:
“The Times reported that, thanks to the corporate tax cuts Mr. Trump signed into law, which FedEx had lobbied for, the company’s tax bill plunged to zero, from $1.5 billion. Mr. Smith had said that businesses like FedEx would respond to the windfall …”
“… with major new investments, yet FedEx reduced its capital expenditures and increased its spending on stock buybacks.”
Read 8 tweets
Jun 22
As another Republican administration sends America into a war in the Middle East and as Republican legislators look for deeper social program cuts to add to the Big Bad Wealth Transfer to the Rich Bill, let’s examine a couple of budget matters. Image
Trump proposed a military budget that for the first time exceeds $1 trillion. Despite years and years of spending more on our military than Russia, China, and Iran combined, we’re warned year after year that we’ve got to keep spending more in order to keep up with our enemies.
So, if we continually spend far more than our adversaries on our military then why aren’t we way far ahead of them militarily? The answer is the same as the answer for why we spend far more on healthcare than other countries do yet we have far more people … Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(