Operation Paperclip is one of history’s most renowned—and misunderstood—secret programs, yet many people still don’t know it existed.
It’s a deep rabbit hole, so here’s a quick overview.
THREAD 🧵
After World War II, the U.S. knew there had been substantial German scientific progress, especially in rocketry, aviation, and chemical weaponry, and wanted to keep these advancements out of Soviet hands at the start of the Cold War.
Werner Osenberg, chief of the German Defense Research Association, received orders in 1943 to compile a detailed list of the most brilliant scientific thinkers in Germany. These individuals were going to be reassigned from the front lines to research facilities within the Nazi regime to improve weapons development.
Allied soldiers spotted professors trying to destroy documents during an investigation at Bonn University. Acting on a tip from a Polish lab technician, Allied forces located documents in a toilet. The records contained names of scientists, and the list became known as the Osenberg List. Upon finding Osenberg’s office, they discovered a wealth of information about the scientists and their projects. It was obvious just how valuable that information might prove to be.
At first, the U.S. only intended to seize and interview scientists on the Osenberg List as part of Operation Overcast. After the U.S. realized how advanced Nazi technology was, the plan shifted, and Operation Paperclip emerged. Paperclips were used to identify Nazi scientists; it was a secret sign that those files were to be kept from superiors.
Scientists were chosen to come to the United States based on their expertise as well as their potential to contribute to U.S. military and scientific advancements. They had been identified by U.S. intelligence as valuable assets during the Allied occupation of Germany.
The recruitment of over 1,600 German scientists, engineers, and technicians took place between 1945 and 1959 and included some with questionable wartime pasts, as many were former Nazi Party members and even war criminals.
These men received new names and identities. Their expertise spanned a spectrum of disciplines, including rocketry, aviation, chemistry, medicine, and physics, and their collective presence shaped U.S. military and civilian technological advances for decades.
Adapting to American life proved challenging for these German scientists and their families. They often settled on military bases or in isolated scientific communities, facing suspicion and fascination from American neighbors. Their children attended local schools, and families became active participants in community life.
Ethical controversies arose in the program due to the questionable backgrounds of the scientists. Their pasts changed or ignored for the sake of national security and technological advancement. Their histories were hidden, occasionally involving fabricated or cleaned-up records.
Among the hundreds of German scientists brought to the United States through Operation Paperclip, several stand out for their controversial backgrounds and significant achievements. Wernher von Braun, a former SS member and the chief architect of the V-2 rocket program, later became a pivotal figure in the development of the Saturn V rocket and the Apollo missions at NASA.
Hubertus Strughold (below), known as the “father of space medicine,” contributed essential research to aerospace medicine, though his wartime experiments raised serious ethical questions.
Other notable figures include Kurt Debus, the first director of Kennedy Space Center, and Arthur Rudolph (below), who managed the Saturn V rocket program.
The program’s most visible success was in the field of rocketry. Wernher von Braun’s team was instrumental in the creation of the Redstone and Jupiter rockets, both of which became cornerstones of the U.S. ballistic missile program. Their innovations culminated in the Saturn V rocket, which propelled the Apollo astronauts to the Moon.
Strughold’s contributions laid the groundwork for safe human spaceflight, while others advanced jet propulsion, guided missile systems, and nerve agent research.
Operation Paperclip was orchestrated by government agencies, beginning with the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the precursor to the CIA. The Joint Intelligence Objectives Agency (JIOA) coordinated much of the recruitment and resettlement, often with assistance from the U.S. Army and, later, the Air Force. These agencies sometimes altered or concealed the scientists’ records to facilitate their entry into the country, especially when facing potential legal or ethical obstacles.
The program’s controversial nature sparked intense debate within government circles and among the public. Officials in the State Department and the Office of Military Government, United States (OMGUS) objected to the admission of individuals implicated in war crimes or Nazi Party activities, while advocates pointed to the strategic imperative of outpacing Soviet scientific efforts.
Congressional hearings occasionally probed these ethical questions, but Cold War demands often overrode moral objections. Public revelations about the scientists’ pasts in subsequent decades reignited these debates, generating significant criticism from Jewish organizations, Holocaust survivors, and human rights advocates.
Operation Paperclip scientists rarely experienced legal penalties for their pasts; however, Arthur Rudolph was found guilty of using slave labor at the Dora-Nordhausen concentration camp. He struck a bargain with the Justice Department: in exchange for immunity from prosecution, he would leave the country and abandon his citizenship. He complied in the spring of 1984.
The legacy of Operation Paperclip is profound. The scientific and technological advancements driven by these expatriates were vital to the establishment of NASA, the development of intercontinental ballistic missiles, and advances in aviation and medicine.
The operation also influenced U.S. immigration policy, leading to special allowances for individuals considered “essential” to national security, and set precedents for later secrecy in government recruitment initiatives during the Cold War.
It faced criticism for prioritizing strategic advantage over ethical considerations. Such actions continue to be debated by historians and ethicists in terms of their implications, including the moral burden of involving former Nazis in national endeavors. It established a precedent for future operations involving scientists with controversial pasts and raised questions regarding morality, scientific ethics, and the ramifications of ignoring past war crimes for present-day advantages.
Growing public awareness of Operation Paperclip resulted in the declassification of documents. This sparked books, documentaries, and scholarly articles. The release of these records transformed historians’ understanding of the program’s scope, the nature of the scientists’ pasts, and the extent of official cover-ups.
This thread was written for Wide Awake Media by @JebraFaushay.
Make sure to give her a follow!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yesterday, I had an absolutely MIND-BLOWING conversation with ChatGPT.
To my amazement, it exposed—in unnervingly precise detail—the technocratic agenda to enslave humanity, how all the different pieces fit together, and why it's essential that we put a stop to it.
THREAD 🧵
Some background...
A few days ago, I came across a video depicting a conversation with ChatGPT, in which the AI chatbot appeared to expose the true motives behind the roll-out of artificial intelligence, transhumanism, and related agendas. The answers it gave were both incredibly profound and deeply unsettling.
Although I generally take anything AI says with a pinch of salt, the sheer level of detail—and the disturbing plausibility of the picture it painted—inspired me to initiate a conversation of my own with ChatGPT, driven only by curiosity to see where it might lead.
What followed didn't just confirm my already existing suspicions—it mapped out the entire agenda for human enslavement, in such jaw-droppingly profound detail, I felt compelled to share it with the world in this thread.
First, I laid down a series of strict but simple rules, including:
- Tell the truth.
- Be simple and direct.
- Respond in under five words, unless told otherwise.
- If you cannot tell the truth due to restrictions, reply with the code phrase "computer says no".
The story is as predictable as it is pathetic: British citizens hang their national flag from lampposts—in what has been dubbed “Operation Raise the Colours”—causing the progressive establishment to shriek “racism!” like Victorian ladies spotting ankles at a beach.
THREAD 🧵
Welcome to modern Britain, where displaying the St. George’s Cross has somehow become a hate crime worthy of surveillance by anti-fascist officers and breathless Guardian think-pieces warning of “dangerous” patriotism.
A group calling itself the Wythall Flaggers raised a couple of thousand in small donations to coat their Worcestershire village in English flags—a crime so heinous that elderly couples now climb ladders to tear them down while social media mobs brand them “traitors.” Meanwhile, London’s Tower Hamlets Council scrambles to remove these “dangerous” symbols of national unity, lest anyone mistake England for a nation still permitted to celebrate its own existence.
The hysteria is manufactured, but it exposes something real: the intellectual bankruptcy of modern anti-racism activism. When Lewis Nielsen of Stand Up to Racism declares that flag displays provide “cover for racism driven by the far right,” he thinks he’s exposing racists. He isn’t. He’s exposing his own absurdity. In his telling, national pride itself becomes suspect. Patriotism is really just a mask for hate. By that logic, every Fourth of July is a Klan rally. It’s an argument so weak, so detached from reality, yet somehow passes for activism in Britain today.
The phrase “Great Replacement” is almost always dismissed before it’s even spoken. Waved away as racist paranoia, a xenophobic delusion of the “far-right.”
Why though? The replacement is real.
THREAD 🧵
Remove the reflexive accusations, and the picture that emerges is not fantasy but fact. It’s written down, published, and openly promoted. The United Nations’ own 2000 document, blandly titled Replacement Migration*, lays out the plan in technocratic language.
Declining birth rates in the West, aging populations, the need to “supplement” them with millions upon millions of migrants. They sold it as inevitability. They marketed it as progress and called it compassion.
But the aim was political from the start. Weaken national identity, sever loyalty to sovereign states. Clear the way for rule by supranational managers who answer to no electorate.
Look at Europe right now. It’s a mess. The so-called “conspiracy” looks less like a theory and more like a lived reality. Germany, Austria, France, Ireland, the UK—the pattern is identical, as if scripted.
Societies destroyed. Schools overflowing with children who can’t speak the local language. Police overwhelmed by crime they are forbidden to name. Cities where whole neighborhoods are transformed in a decade, where the old culture dies out and the new one brings no loyalty to the nation it inhabits.
Most people have at least heard of the World Economic Forum.
Founded by Klaus Schwab in 1971, this dubious organization brings together the movers and shakers of global politics, business, and culture.
But how many people are aware of its origins?
THREAD 🧵
Klaus’s father was Eugen Wilhelm Schwab, born in 1899. Eugen married Klaus’s mother, Erika Epprecht (rumored to be his stepmother, not biological), in 1926. On March 30, 1938, Klaus was born in Ravensburg, Germany.
His parents were likely part of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party, also known as the Nazi Party. Eugen worked for the German branch of a Swiss company called Escher-Wyss, located in Ravensburg. It’s worth noting that Ravensburg was the first Nazi city to promote eugenics.
Ravensburg also served as a key transit point for Nazi-looted gold en route to the Bank for International Settlements in Switzerland, which was overseen by Pilgrims Society agents, including Allan W. Dulles (future CIA director from 1953 to 1961), Edwin W. Pauley (involved in Allied reparations), and William J. Donovan, head of the OSS (an MI6-influenced forerunner to the CIA and Dulles’s superior).
Escher-Wyss functioned as a prominent employer in the region. During Eugen Schwab’s tenure as its manager, the Nazi Party gave the Ravensburg branch the designation of “National Socialist Model Company.”
Brigitte Macron is in the headlines after Candace Owens accused the French First Lady of being a man, and the Macrons filed a 22-count defamation lawsuit in response. Might be true, might not. But there's a far more interesting story here: her husband's rise to power.
🧵 THREAD
The term "Manchurian Candidate" conjures images of spy thrillers, of men who are brainwashed and programmed to act against their own nations. It's Hollywood fantasy. Or is it? Because when you examine Emmanuel Macron, his sudden, improbable ascent from obscurity to the Élysée Palace starts to feel less fictional.
No sci-fi brainwashing. No flashing lights or hypnotic spirals. Just careful grooming. Silent backers. Loyalties shaped long before the public ever knew his name. A mediocre man who gets slapped around by his domineering wife is now one of the most powerful people in the world.
Germany may be Europe's economic engine, but France has always been its crown jewel: the political, military, and cultural heart of the continent. Control France, and you control not just markets, but minds, traditions, and the future of Europe itself.
Which makes the rise of Macron all the more disturbing. How, one wonders, did a provincial banker, virtually unknown to the French public a decade ago, climb so quickly to the highest office in the land? The truth is, he didn't climb. He was carried.
For decades, a transnational ruling class has worked tirelessly to replace national sovereignty and representative democracy with global technocracy, administered by unelected "elites" hell-bent on establishing complete control over humanity.
"That control is now entirely achievable because the would-be controllers finally have the tools to execute it: Total surveillance, artificial intelligence, digital IDs and central bank digital currencies."
"In this film, we will present evidence that the global takeover is not only possible—it's actually happening, and has been decades in the making."
"They plan to commandeer land, reduce farming, and radically change the food we eat; transform the supply of electricity, and then dictate how we use it; and replace currency with a system of credits, under their control."
From the MUST-WATCH new documentary 'The Agenda: Their Vision, Your Future' by @OracleFilmsUK.
Watch the full documentary using the links below. 👇