An activist investor just released a turnaround plan for Cracker Barrel. It's incredible reading.
Sardar Biglari, who fixed Steak 'n Shake after 2008, has owned $CBRL shares for 14 years. And he's not happy with how his investment has gone.
Let's dive into the 120-page plan 👇
Cracker Barrel stock is down nearly 50% over the last year, compared to a 28% gain in the S&P 500.
Over the last five years, the stock is down 70%, compared to a gain of 108% in the index.
Even prior to Covid, guest traffic was decreasing 1-2% per year. Over the past two years, it's down 3.5% and 5.0% (these are *massive* declines for a restaurant chain).
Operating income has decreased 84%(!) since FY19.
Cracker Barrel has the worst margins in the industry.
Operating margins are just 1.3%, compared to 11.5% for Darden (owner of Olive Garden and Cheddar's).
Even excluding overhead and depreciation, margins are 11.0%, compared to nearly 20% for Darden.
One of Cracker Barrel's advantages used to be that its down home, "old country" style didn't require renovations every 6-7 years.
In the words of their former CFO, if a casual dining company announces a remodel program, "run, don't walk in the other direction."
Customer complaints center on reduced quality and smaller portion sizes. Store remodels don't fix this.
(Note: I'm sure the company is in a bind here. Its elderly customers are likely price-sensitive, and rising ingredient prices don't leave them much room to maintain margins.)
Biglari is nominating three directors—including himself—with strong experience in casual restaurants.
Focus areas: More store openings, better customer value prop, high-ROIC growth, customer loyalty program, addressing technology challenges.
Guest traffic is down a staggering 18.8% since 2019.
Formula for erosion of traffic:
Deteriorating product quality
Reduced portion sizes
Declining service
Price increases
Again, hard to manage that dynamic when consumers are price sensitive, ingredient prices are rising, and labor is short.
Over the last five years, Cracker Barrel has suffered the worst margin erosion in the industry.
These are honestly just shockingly bad margins. Even for the casual restaurant industry.
Cracker Barrel has spent $853M on capex since FY19.
For comparison, operating income over the period was $754M. The company is spending more on growth (which isn't leading to new revenue) than it's generating in EBIT.
West Coast expansion won't save the company—costs are higher and brand recognition is lower.
The company has already had to close nearly 60% of is locations in California and Oregon.
Cracker Barrel leadership seeks to cut its dividend 80%, to fund capex for store remodels.
Cracker Barrel has been struggling to improve its point of sales systems since 2017.
Wall Street equity research analysts have no confidence in management's turnaround plan.
Zero analysts have a buy rating on the stock.
He's basically calling all the board directors old boomers with no industry experience.
95% share price erosion(!) at this director's last company.
Activist investor Starboard (remember their viral deck about Darden back in the day?) warned that restraurant remodels are an easy way to incinerate cash and destroy shareholder value.
When it comes to remodels, ROIC is almost always below WACC.
lmao my good friend @SpiritofPines makes a cameo in the appendix 😂
Conclusion:
- Divest Maple Street Biscuit
- Make sure capex generates acceptable ROIC
- Fix the customer value prop
- Reverse the decline in store traffic
- Leverage good footprint (662 locations, many in high-growth areas) to return cash to shareholders once margins improve
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵 “Why care about California? It’s more Mexican than American at this point.”
Respectfully, no. This is wrong. California isn’t just American; California is America itself, every bit as much as the colonies of New England or the plains states of the Heartland. We must cherish and protect every inch of it, no less than we would the forestland of Georgia or the prairie brush of Texas.
When tens of thousands of gold prospectors braved the Rocky Mountains and the Great Basin Desert in search of the quintessential American promises—self-reliance, wealth, a new beginning—it was to California’s mines they trekked. California is where they built San Francisco from a remote backwater of just 200 souls into the 19th century's most important city in America and the most significant trading hub in the world.
In World War II, it was California’s 140 military installations that housed 1.6M American GIs, and it was largely through the ports of Los Angeles and San Francisco that many of them embarked to the Pacific theater. For tens of thousands of them, California’s coastline would be the last American soil they would ever see in life.
The tariff situation is causing massive ripple effects throughout the economy. Failing to resolve the situation quickly means risking the return of a disastrous condition from 50 years ago.
Let’s talk about stagflation 🧵👇
If you’re not familiar with it, stagflation is the combination of three painful economic phenomena:
1. High inflation 2. Slow or negative economic growth 3. High unemployment
Our parents experienced it in the 70s and 80s. The effects were devastating, and the remedy was costly.
Stagflation is worse than an economic recession.
Stagflation a self-reinforcing financial doom loop, devouring everything in its path. The economy slows down, jobs disappear, and yet—paradoxically—prices still rise.
THREAD: Here's what a dive bar in Memphis taught me about tariffs, global trade, and domestic manufacturing.
(Yes, I'm being serious.)
Let's talk about why it's so hard to produce things in America, what it means for our country, and what we can do about it 🧵👇
Years ago, I worked on a corpdev team at a large industrial conglomerate. This company was a major player in basically every material in the world, from crude oil to glass to fertilizer.
There was only one thing missing: Steel.
So—naturally!—we decided to build a steel mill.
We worked with a boutique investment bank (Ari, if you're reading this, you're still the craziest finance wizard I've ever met), partnered with a major PE firm, wrote an absurdly large check, and got to work building a brand new steel mill in the middle of freaking nowhere.
Private equity is coming for the accounting industry. They’re rolling up practices, cutting costs, raising prices, and doing what PE does best.
There’s just one problem:
It’s not going to work. They’re lighting capital on fire, and they don’t even realize it.
Let’s dig in!👇🧵
This is going to be a loooong thread, touching on everything from the unique structure of the CPA industry to the inter-generational culture war within many firms to how PE firms structure exit opportunities.
Stick with me, though, and I promise I’ll tie it together. 😉 (2/28)
Let’s start with what PE likes about the CPA industry. If you read their slide decks, it almost sounds perfect for them:
- It’s one of the only industries PE hasn’t already picked over (“It’s terra nova! A huge blue ocean!”), meaning there’s low-hanging fruit to optimize. (3/28)
By now, we all know about the new tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico. But what does this actually mean for businesses and consumers?
I just downloaded and analyzed a bunch of Trade Department data to find out.
Let’s dig in! 👇
Every year, the US runs a trade deficit with both Canada and Mexico. In simple terms, we import from them more than we export to them.
In 2023, Canada sent us $419B of goods (blue), while we sent them $354B (green). This resulted in a $64B deficit (yellow).
Similarly, the US also runs a persistent trade deficit with Mexico. Mexico’s import numbers aren’t much larger than Canada’s, but, because we export less to them, our trade deficit is larger—$152B in 2023.