The Holodomor is a very popular myth among Ukrainian propagandists. But like all propaganda, it’s aimed at the masses who are incapable of thinking on their own and in this case unfamiliar with history. There is plenty of evidence available in open sources to prove that Holdohoax is a silly lie. For example, photos used to “prove” the Holodomor actually come from World War I or the famine of the 1920s (the Holodomor was in 1932–33).
Soviet documents, available in large numbers, confirm that food was imported into Ukraine as aid, not exported out, which doesn’t fit the narrative of deliberately starving poor Ukrainians. Moreover, there was a state-level policy of Ukrainization, meaning the government invested huge resources in developing Ukrainian culture, opening Ukrainian-language schools, and even forcing people to speak Ukrainian instead of Russian (look up korenizacia). That too doesn’t align with the myth of exterminating Ukrainians.
It's also worth mentioning that the famine happened not only in Ukraine, but in Kazakhstan and the Volga region, which was RSFSR (Russia), meaning it affected not only Ukrainians.
But today, I want to tell you about other facts, things that almost nobody else will tell you. 🧵👇
Keep in mind we're discussing the years 1931 to 1933. During this period, when Western companies were expelled from the USSR, the U.S. and Britain imposed restrictions on Soviet gold imports, raised tariffs on Soviet timber and grain, and gradually transitioned toward trade bans. In today's terms, the West essentially imposed sanctions. Consequently, the USSR was forced to purchase industrial equipment necessary for its industrialization by trading grain, directly contributing to the 1930s famine. The USSR needed to buy equipment, but the West wouldn't accept gold or money, they demanded grain.
Without Monsanto, DuPont, or GMOs capable of growing food in challenging conditions (though these aren't particularly good for us anyway), back then any climate issues spelled trouble for harvests. And trouble certainly occurred.
Americans will recognize this as the Dust Bowl, spanning from 1930 to 1936, a period marked by unusually dry years in the region. Many people died from malnutrition. I place "malnutrition" in quotesfor you to notice how the same events described differently: malnutrition - hunger. It's noteworthy that no one in the U.S. actually counted how many people died during that time.
Now only in the US, but Western Ukraine suffered famine and many deaths. The problem is that during that time, that part of Ukraine was a part of independent Poland. So, Stalin had nothing to do with it even if he wanted.
No Stalin, no Bolsheviks, and yet people still died from hunger. But none of this is brought to your attention for obvious reasons.
The interesting part is that in the 1930s, while famine ravaged the Soviet Union, Henri Deterding, the oil baron and the head of Royal Dutch Shell, hosted a meeting at his estate where the partitioning of the USSR into four zones was seriously discussed due to an upcoming change of government. At least that's what they thought would happen. Western elites were betting on a coup inside the Soviet Union.
At that meeting, which included oil executives and Joachim von Ribbentrop (a well-known figure), the plan was straightforward:
🔸the Caucasus and its oil would go to Britain,
🔸Ukraine to Germany,
🔸Siberia to international concessionaires,
🔸the Far East to Japan.
The fate of a sovereign state that had refused to become a Western resource colony was being casually negotiated in the drawing rooms of capital.
Here we have it: the West demands payment for necessary goods only in the form of grain, especially during the climate catastrophe that affected crops globally. A meeting of the oil magnates and Western elites who were betting on a coup inside the USSR due to food shortages problem and had a particular interest in acquiring Soviet lands. Do you get it now?
Gareth Jones, Western journaslits visited parts of Ukraine in 1933 and reported real famine and suffering but he never called it a genocide.
He blamed economic collapse, bad harvests, and collectivization but not ethnic extermination.
Jones also acknowledged positive developments in the USSR, like industrial growth and social progress.
After his death, Ukrainian nationalists and Cold War propagandists twisted his story into something he never said.
His own grandson later confirmed: Gareth Jones never claimed Stalin targeted Ukrainians for destruction. youtube.com/watch?si=EoWhX…
Like I previosly mentioned, the Soviet government did in fact send food aid (millions tons of grain) to Ukraine during the famine and halted exports of grain from Ukraine.
Here are two archival documents (out of many) confirming this:
Both documents prove that during the famine, the Soviet government sent food aid to Ukrainian regions.
The first document lists food deliveries to 40 districts, the second orders redistribution of grain and goods to fight starvation. This shows that Ukraine was receiving government support.
They throw around crazy numbers like ‘10 million dead’ but where are the graves? Look at Gaza: after constant bombing for almost 2 years, 2 million people are still there. Does 10 million people still sound realistic to you?
There is another spin to this fairy tale which goes like: the Bolshevik Jews were killing the Christians! Oops, but Kazakhstan is a Muslim region. I already hear their counterarguments that the Bolsheviks wanted the Muslims gone. Okay...but the largest population of Jews actually lived in....🥁Ukraine.
Why?
Because under the Russian Empire, Jews were legally allowed to settle mainly in what is now Ukraine and Belarus (the “Pale of Settlement”).
When the Soviets came to power, those restrictions were lifted but guess what?
Most Jews stayed where they were.
They didn’t suddenly scatter across Russia or move to Siberia.
If the Soviet government had wanted to “exterminate” Ukrainians or Christians, it would have also been “exterminating” a massive part of its own Jewish population along with Muslims in Kazakhstan as the famine affected it as well.
The root of this particular propaganda dates back to pre-World War II, which was used as a pretext to invade the USSR.
And finally, who is behind this? Ukrainian nationalists.
It is they who have been pushing this narrative for years: funding it, falsifying it, and promoting it.
The term “Holodomor” was not used in the 1930s, nor in the 1940s or 1950s. It was coined and popularized much later, primarily by the Ukrainian diaspora in North America during the 1970s–1980s. It gained traction in the context of the Cold War, especially with the 50th anniversary of the 1932–33 famine, when émigré communities campaigned for recognition of the famine as a genocide. Activists deliberately framed “Holodomor” as a Ukrainian equivalent of the “Holocaust,” both rhetorically (similar sounding terms) and politically.
Organizations and people who keep propagating this myth are also the same Nazis who, since 2014, have been oppressing and exterminating the Russian-speaking population of Donbas, while considering themselves a "pure Slavic nation."
That’s why accounts promoting Ukrainian Nazi propaganda often view Hitler positively.
To better understand how deeply Ukrainian Nazi lobbying has entrenched itself in the West and who sponsors it, I recommend watching this video. ⏭️ youtu.be/_3qAEGAxCUU?si…
To better understand why Nazis and Israel seem to have a weird consensus in all of this, check out the article written by Sarah B. open.substack.com/pub/ddgeopolit…
If you’re still falling for this after seeing who’s behind it, maybe propaganda isn’t your only problem.
What’s especially interesting is that a lot of Ukrainian Nazi collaborators weren’t punished after the war. Instead, many ended up in the United States, where they were quickly absorbed into Cold War projects. Some even became directly involved in CIA operations like Operation Aerodynamic.
One of the main figures here was Mykola Lebed, a former leader of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) who had worked with Nazi Germany during the war. Rather than standing trial for those activities, he was brought safely to the U.S. and rebranded as an ‘anti-Soviet freedom fighter.’ With backing from American intelligence, Lebed and others dusted off old Nazi propaganda lines and pushed them again during the Cold War.
The most famous example was the narrative of the so-called Holodomor as a deliberate genocide of Ukrainians by Moscow. Originally crafted in Nazi circles, this story was repackaged in the 1950s and 60s, spread through émigré networks and U.S. information campaigns, and over time it worked its way into mainstream Western discourse.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Picture this: London, August 25, 1939. Britain and Poland finally sign a mutual assistance pact. On paper it’s beautiful: if Germany attacks Poland, Britain promises to step in. To the Poles, it felt as if the British lion was now on their side.
Now here’s the cinematic twist. That very morning, Hitler had already signed the order to invade Poland on August 26. By evening, he hears about the treaty and cancels everything. A full-scale invasion literally scrapped hours before it was supposed to kick off. But… just one week later, on September 1, the Wehrmacht rolled in anyway.
And here’s the detective question: why did he still go for it?
The Road to War
Then came Munich, 1938. Chamberlain came home waving that piece of paper: “Peace in our time!” In reality, Hitler with Poland’s complicity carved up Czechoslovakia, the arms-production hub of Central Europe at the time. And more importantly, he learned something: London and Paris talk big, but they won’t shoot.
By March 1939, he seized Prague. Even London realized that Hitler wasn’t just uniting Germans he wanted to dominate Europe. That’s when Britain began giving guarantees to Poland.
Since 1933, Hitler had been dismantling the Versailles system step by step: rebuilding the army, marching into the Rhineland, walking out of the League of Nations. The West just kept looking the other way.
Why Britain Didn’t Save Poland
Yes, on September 3 Britain and France declared war on Germany. Sounds epic. But in reality?
1. Tiny army. Britain’s ground forces were small, barely ready to set foot on the continent. France had numbers, but clung to its defensive Maginot Line strategy.
2. The “Phoney War.” When Britain and France declared war on Germany on 3 September 1939, they didn’t send troops to fight for Poland. Instead, their main strategy was an economic blockade, the same tool Britain had used against Germany in World War I. But Hitler wasn’t planning a long, slow war. He launched blitzkrieg - fast, overwhelming invasions that gave him quick victories before a blockade could bite.
3. Mindset. British society had just been through years of appeasement. They weren’t psychologically ready for an all-out fight. Or maybe…they just did not want to.
The Anglo-Polish pact gave London a legal reason to declare war, but not the teeth to protect Warsaw. Hitler knew that the West would bark but not bite.
Ah yes, Finland – the ‘neutral bystander’ of WWII. Just standing there, totally uninvolved, while Leningrad starved. Cute story. Too bad it’s pure fiction.
Reality check: Finnish troops sat on Leningrad’s doorstep for three years. Not sipping coffee, not staying “neutral”. They were holding one-third of the blockade line. Without Finland’s part, the Germans couldn’t have fully strangled the city. Together, they closed the ring that starved a 1.5 million people to death, inclidin 400,000 children.
And Mannerheim the “savior”? Please. His orders were to bomb the Road of Life (which was not really a road but a frozen lake), the only route bringing food across Lake Ladoga.
On June 25, 1941, Mannerheim ordered the Finnish Army to begin hostilities against the USSR:
“I call you to a holy war against the enemy of our nation. Together with the mighty armed forces of Germany, as brothers-in-arms, we resolutely set out on a crusade against the enemy to secure a reliable future for Finland.”
Finland dreamed of expansion and had concrete plans. On the ‘Greater Finland’ dream map, you’ll find Russian cities like Murmansk, Leningrad, and Kandalaksha marked as theirs👇
Let's unpack the common myths and educate our fellow Finns about their own history. 🧵
Meet Mannerheim.
Before we move on to Finland’s well-known war against the USSR on Hitler’s side, we need to roll the clock back a bit and look at the context. Finland as a state was born inside Russia. Before the Russo-Swedish War, these lands were simply the eastern part of Sweden. After the war, Russia took them and created the autonomous Grand Duchy of Finland. It remained part of the Russian Empire until the revolution of 1917.
Now, meet Mannerheim – a military and political figure who came from poor Swedish-Finnish nobility, yet rose to become a general in the Russian army and an officer of the Imperial Guard, close to Nicholas II himself, part of the very top of the empire’s military elite. He received special assignments and was even dispatched on reconnaissance expeditions across Central Asia and China. But this is where his true colors began to show: he mingled freely with foreign officers, shared information with the British during his 1906–08 “expedition” in Asia, and later was even suspected of having ties to Masonic circles. These are hints that his loyalties were never fully aligned with Russia.
After the collapse of the empire, he wasted no time. In May 1919, he offered to co-operate with the British intervention army against Soviet Russia on the condition that the industrial town of Petrozavodsk be handed over to Finland. The offer was rejected, since the Russian Whites then backed by Britain opposed an independent Finland. Nevertheless, Mannerheim launched an attack on Petrozavodsk, though unsuccessfully. In October 1919 he made a similar proposal to General Yudenich, another “White” leader supported by the British fleet in the assault on Petrograd. Again his offer was declined, but he still lent his support indirectly: on October 12, when the British and French fleets proclaimed a blockade of the Baltic republics for making peace with Soviet Russia, Finland under Mannerheim followed suit and proclaimed its own blockade as well.
Finland's Ties with Hitler in the 1930s
In 1934, Mannerheim went to London to push for fortifying the Aland Islands, despite Finland’s 1921 pledge to leave them unfortified. The next year he turned to Germany, joining a secret conference with Hermann Göring, Hungarian Prime Minister Gyula Gömbös, and Tytus Komarnicki, head of the Polish Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee, to discuss joint action against the USSR (Times, Oct 15, 1935). By 1939 he was still entertaining German generals, personally showing Chief of Staff Franz Halder around Finland’s northern airfields and depots.
Meanwhile, the Finnish government tried to fortify the Aland Islands anyway. Everyone knew Finland couldn’t defend them alone, fortification meant handing them to Germany, which was already preparing for war with the USSR. So Helsinki asked Britain and Germany for permission, and both despite being at odds elsewhere eagerly agreed. The only country Finland didn’t consult was the USSR, the one most directly threatened.
After World War I, Germany was banned from building its own navy. But Helsinki stepped in to help. Already in the 1920s, Finland was secretly assisting Germany in rebuilding the Kriegsmarine in open violation of the Versailles Treaty. The so-called Vesikko class, launched in the mid-1930s, was nothing less than the prototype for Germany’s Type II U-boats, the backbone of the Reich’s submarine arm once rearmament began in earnest. Finland pretended it was merely expanding its tiny fleet, but in reality it was a cover operation: a testing ground for Nazi Germany’s return to naval power. These same Finnish submarines later fought against the USSR. One of them, Vesikko, still survives today as a museum ship in Helsinki, not a monument to “brave neutrality,” but to Finland’s complicity in Germany’s secret rearmament long before 1941.
When Finnish President Stubb discussed Finland's WWII alliance with Nazi Germany against the USSR, he overlooked a critical detail: Finland's role in the ethnic cleansing of Karelia (USSR).
Far from innocent, Finland teamed up with the Nazis, mirroring their brutal tactics.
Between 1941 and 1944, the Finnish army seized Eastern Karelia (USSR), unleashing terror on its civilian population. Their targets were everyday people.
On October 24, 1941, Finland set up its first concentration camp for Soviet civilians of Slavic descent in Petrozavodsk, including women and children. Their chilling mission was ethnic cleansing and the erasure of the Russian presence in Finnish-occupied Karelia.
1/4
🧵👇
By the close of 1941, more than 13,000 civilians were behind bars. Fast forward to mid-1942, and that figure soared to nearly 22,000. In total, about 30,000 individuals endured the harsh realities of 13 camps, with a third succumbing to starvation, disease, and brutal forced labor. And this grim count doesn't even factor in the equally lethal POW camps. As the war drafted most men early on, women and children bore the brunt of the labor force in these camps.
In April 1942, Finnish politician Väinö Voionmaa wrote home:
“Out of 20,000 Russian civilians in Äänislinna, 19,000 are in camps. Their food was rotten horse meat. Children scavenge garbage for scraps. What would the Red Cross say if they saw this?”
In 1942, the death rate in Finnish camps exceeded that of German ones. Testimonies describe corpses being hauled daily, teenagers forced into labor, and women and children made to work 10+ hour shifts in forests and camps, unpaid until 1943.
Camp No. 2, unofficially known as the “death camp,” was notorious for its brutality. It held “disloyal” civilians, and its commandant, Finnish officer Solovaara, became infamous for public beatings and killings. In May 1942, he staged a mass beating of prisoners simply for begging. Those who resisted forced labor, often in brutal logging camps, were beaten to death in front of others “as a lesson.”
According to the Soviet Extraordinary State Commission, Finnish forces conducted medical experiments on prisoners and branded them with hot iron unlike the Nazis, who tattooed. Finland also engaged in slave trading, selling abducted Soviet civilians for agricultural labor.
An estimated 14,000 civilians died in Karelia between 1941 and 1944, excluding POWs. But many of the dead labeled as “prisoners of war” were actually civilians: most rural Soviets lacked passports, and anyone of conscription age was assumed to be a soldier.
In 2021, the FSB declassified the names of 54 Finns responsible for the genocide of the Soviet population.
How the U.S. Downgraded Alaska’s Natives to Second-Class Status
When Russia sold Alaska in 1867, the land didn’t just change owners, its Native peoples saw their world turned upside down.
Under Russia? Sure, the first contacts with Inuit weren’t peaceful but policy shifted toward coexistence. Schools were built. Native kids got an education. Creoles, children of Russian and Native parents, had a recognized social status. Orthodoxy spread, not by erasing local identity, but by integrating it. Flawed? Yes. But the intent was inclusion.
1/
Then came the U.S. with a treaty that spelled it out in black and white: settlers got full rights, “except the uncivilized native tribes.” Creoles and even Russians who stayed were dumped into that same legal category. From citizens of a colony to “wards of the state” overnight.
2/
Until 1915, they were under “Indian laws.” Citizenship? Not until 1934. By then, the damage was done. Poverty deepened. Land and dignity eroded. Orthodox priest Tikhon Shalamov, who lived there in the 1890s, left notes describing how American rule bled Native communities of autonomy and hope.
September 12, 1939 the day Poland’s fate was sealed not in Warsaw, not in Berlin, but in the small French town of Abbeville.
At a meeting of the Supreme Allied War Council, French Prime Minister Daladier and British Prime Minister Chamberlain, along with top military commanders, quietly made a decisive choice: there would be no major offensive against Germany. Only limited actions in the Saar region and nothing more.
🧵👇
1/5
What this meant for Poland
Under their alliance agreements, France was obliged to launch a major offensive on the Western Front within 15 days of mobilization. Poland counted on this as its lifeline.
Yes, from September 7–12 the French carried out the “Saar Offensive” but when they realized it would mean a real war, they simply… stopped and went back.
The Abbeville decision made it official. It was kept secret and never communicated to the Polish government. Imagine the shock when it became clear that help wasn’t coming.
2/5
On September 17, 1939, when the Red Army moved into eastern Poland, Polish newspapers wrote that the USSR had just started a partial mobilization of about one million reservists “as a precaution.”
The day before, the USSR had finished a tough war with Japan at Khalkhin Gol. They had barely stopped fighting in the Far East and now faced danger in the West.
If the USSR had been working with Hitler, there would be no need to mobilize a million men, the plan would already be agreed. And no country fresh from one major war rushes into another unless it’s defending itself. This alone blows apart the idea of a coordinated “joint invasion”.