A reminder for the new school term: Although there is still no @educationgov guidance for schools on supporting students who identify as trans or non-binary, schools must abide by existing statutory safeguarding obligations and UK law as follows 1/3
#edutwitter
Keeping Children Safe in Education (statutory obligations)
Schools "should take a cautious approach" when supporting "gender questioning children", bearing in mind the "many unknowns about the impact of social transition" and these children's wider "vulnerabilities, including having complex mental health and psychosocial needs". Schools must also work "in partnership with the child’s parents"
A failure to act in accordance with KCSIE puts children at risk and is a breach of a school's legal safeguarding obligations.
2/3
Compliance with UK equality law
Under 18s are either male or female in UK law in accordance with their biological sex (irrespective of any rights pertaining to other protected characteristics). Single-sex facilities etc are to be operated on the basis of sex (not gender identity).
3/3
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Many MPs at this WESC session seem to believe that the only way trans-identified people can be accommodated in society is to conceal their trans status at all costs. We think this has profound, negative psychological consequences ... 1/6
We urge MPs to read this section of the Cass Review, reflecting on the drawbacks of living "in stealth". The reference here is to children, but these issues are familiar to many parents of young trans-identified adults. 2/6
MPs who argue that concealing someone's sex at all costs is essential are sending a message that a trans identity is something deeply shameful which must be hidden from the rest of the world. 3/6
The @NYTimes podcast "The Protocol" paints a picture of a golden era in paediatric gender medicine before the arrival of new and more complex adolescent-onset patients. An audit of UK GIDS referrals in 2000 suggests a rather different tale ... 1/11 nytco.com/press/introduc…
The 2000 audit of 124 paediatric referrals to the GIDS clinic is described in @hannahsbee "Time to Think": Only 2.5% had "no associated problems", 70% had more than five "associated features", including profound difficulties/vulnerabilities outlined in the next tweet. 2/11
57% had difficulties with parents/carers, 52% difficulties with peer relationships, close to 1/4 exhibited "inappropriately sexualised behaviour" (a red flag for CSA), a similar number had a history of self-harm, 25% had spent time in care (compared to 0.67% of children in general), 42% had lost one or more parents through separation or bereavement, 38% had families with mental health problems, a similar proportion had families with physical health problems. 3/11
The expert warnings cited here by @hannahsbee about the risks posed by cross-sex hormones were only one factor in @DHSCgovuk setting up its review. Another vital contributor was the evidence about reckless prescribing by private providers.
In July 2024 @BayswaterSG wrote to DHSC warning that private providers were exploiting inaction over CSH to circumvent the new puberty blocker ban. A family court case in May 2024 found "dangerous levels" of testosterone prescribed to a child by Gender GP and issued a stark warning about this provider. BSG also alerted DHSC to online parent forums with evidence of CSH being prescribed to minors as young as 12.
2/6
In October 2024 @BayswaterSG wrote again to DHSC, this time highlighting a case where a private provider regulated by the Care Quality Commission had prescribed hormones to a 16 year old with a history of complex mental health issues, claiming that this was compatible with NHS guidance.
3/6
Understanding the full context for trans-identifying children requires an appreciation of the information they have been provided with at school (including at LGBT/Rainbow clubs) & from online social media influencers as well as neurodevelopmental factors telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/04/2…
Archive link here:
The @BayswaterSG iceberg graphic illustrates the complex and multifactorial background to a trans identity. archive.ph/dbLOM
The urgent need for a more holistic perspective is also echoed in the Telegraph editorial, which reminds policymakers that safeguarding children must be the priority. telegraph.co.uk/opinion/2025/0…
Thoughts on discussing the Supreme Court ruling with trans-identified youth & others: 1. Recognising that sex is real and worthy of legal protection is not a threat to those who identify as trans, nor does it rule out exploring with compassion and curiosity what gender identity might mean to someone.
2. The Equality Act protects a plurality of beliefs on matters of sex and gender identity, it recognises different groups including on the basis of "sexual orientation" and "gender reassignment", and it recognises the pertinence of "sex" with an understanding that trans people do not change sex.
3. Demands for the complete erasure of sex as a meaningful category in law and society have arguably been the cause of the current toxicity around this topic. This has been particularly harmful for women and for trans-identified people of both sexes.
This thread offers a brief overview of our Top Ten Tips for parents. Visit our website for more detail.
1/10 Listen to your child: They are telling you something important and meaningful to them, as they try to work out where they belong in the world.bayswatersupport.org.uk/toptentips/
2/10 Inform yourself: Your child is a reasonable person who is responding to their unease the best way they know how. So get to know what your child is reading, watch the same YouTubers they’re glued to, follow conversations on Reddit.
3/10 The internet is not your family's friend: No generation of parents in history has raised children with unfettered daily access to such a vast ungoverned resource, where children can connect remotely with complete strangers and encounter extreme views.