Adam Livingston Profile picture
Aug 28 11 tweets 3 min read Read on X
🧵Why It's Easy to Retire on Bitcoin

Opening your 401(k) statement feels like eating gas-station sushi.

Today we spice the bland 4 % Rule with Bitcoin rocket fuel.

Grab a helmet, the buffet just caught fire. 👇Image
Quick refresher:

The 4 % Rule says withdraw 4 % of your starting balance each year, then raise that payout with inflation.

Historically it keeps you solvent for 30 years.

Example: $1 M → $40 K first year, inflation bumps later.

Simple, boring, fine.
What happens if you trusted the S&P 500 from 2015-2024?

You posted roughly 243 % total return, ~13 % per year.

$1 M ballooned to $3.43 M.

Nice, but it still buys the economy-class cruise that serves lukewarm shrimp.
Same decade, same starting pile, 100 % Bitcoin.

Return: 41 536 % (yes, three commas).

$1 M → $416 M.

The withdrawal check is $16.6 M per year, indexed to inflation.

That covers shrimp, cruise ship, and the ocean.
Blended magic:

• 80 % S&P, 20 % BTC → $86 M
• Withdrawal: $3.44 M per year

You kept four-fifths in polite index funds yet nuked mediocrity 25×.
Why? Bitcoin is asymmetry in a bottle.

Downside capped at what you invest, upside basically open season on fiat.

A teaspoon of orange powder turns oatmeal into nitroglycerin pancakes.
Yes, volatility is real.

Bitcoin once face-planted 73 %.

The 80/20 portfolio saw a worst-year drawdown near 29 %. Ugly, but that drawdown later bought yachts.

Cold cash buffer = sanity serum for people not totally sold on Bitcoin yet.
Implementation cheat code:

(aka life-changing advice for someone not even a full BTC maxi yet):

1️⃣ Pick a 10-20 % BTC slice.
2️⃣ DCA weekly, sleep better.
3️⃣ Rebalance annually.
4️⃣ Cold storage wallet, multi-sig, zero excuses.
5️⃣ Keep 3-5 years expenses in T-Bills or cash.
I ran 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations.

Classic S&P survives ~90 % of timelines. (30 yrs retirement)

The 80/20 blend survives 96 %, even with back-to-back Bitcoin crashes.

Trim withdrawals by 10 % in disasters and the plan turns into a cockroach with diamond armor.
The old 4 % Rule paid the bills.

Add Bitcoin, your bills pay themselves while you hunt for a tax haven with beach views.

Time to press the orange button, automate the buys, and invite your financial advisor to the victory parade.Image
If you'd like this thread in video form where I break down the power of Bitcoin for retirement, here you go!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Livingston

Adam Livingston Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AdamBLiv

Aug 30
BITCOIN VS. REAL ESTATE DEATH MATCH

You seriously don’t understand how terrible of an investment real estate is.

🧵Let’s break down the numbers in FIVE EASY STEPS👇Image
📈 Step 1: The Bitcoin CAGR Death March

Bitcoin at a 30% CAGR (extremely conservative, it’s been 58% over the past decade) for 10 years means:

If you start with $1,000 you end with ~$13,790

That’s a 13.8x in a decade.

So $100k in Bitcoin → $1.38 million in 10 years.
🏚️ Step 2: Real Estate “Returns” (LOL)

The historical U.S. residential housing CAGR is about 4–5% in nominal terms, 1–2% in real (after inflation).

Let’s be generous and give real estate a 6% CAGR fantasyland scenario.

$1000 turns into $1,790

That’s a 1.79x in a decade.

$100k in real estate → $179k.
Read 7 tweets
Aug 29
🧵The Alchemy of War: How Central Banks Turned Human Blood Into Balance Sheets

Your grandfather didn't die for freedom.

He died for a banking system👇Image
Every war memorial lists names. None list the bankers who made it possible.

Behind every "Great War" lies a Greater Lie: that these conflicts were inevitable clashes of ideology or territory.

The truth? Wars became endless the moment we let governments print the money to pay for them.

This is that story.
Picture medieval England, 1337.

King Edward III wants to invade France.

His treasury contains 12,000 pounds in gold.

His war will cost 400,000.

The math doesn't work. The war ends before it truly begins.

This was the iron law of pre-modern conflict:

You could only kill as much as your treasury could afford.
Read 25 tweets
Aug 21
🧵The Sad Truth About Bitcoin Ownership

The sad truth about Bitcoin ownership isn't what you think.

It's not about access, education, or "financial literacy."

It's about something much darker and more permanent.

Bitcoin is the Stanford Marshmallow Test for 8 billion
adults.

And 90% are already failing👇Image
Here's the uncomfortable reality:

Bitcoin doesn't just filter capital.

It filters consciousness itself.

The same cognitive traits that predict lifetime wealth accumulation predict Bitcoin hodling through -80% drawdowns.

This isn't coincidence. It's evolutionary selection pressure.
Three psychological gates guard meaningful Bitcoin ownership:

🧠 Gate 1: Abstract reasoning (digital scarcity, cryptographic proofs)

🎯 Gate 2: Emotional regulation (surviving volatility cycles) 🔐

Gate 3: Technical sovereignty (self-custody mastery)

Most people hit the first gate and bounce off forever.
Read 21 tweets
Aug 20
🚨WHY STRATEGY IS NOT A PONZI SCHEME🚨

This coordinated FUD nonsense is RIDICULOUS.

Let's go through EVERY SINGLE POINT of this argument to dismantle it.

DOUBTING SAYLOR IS A VERY STUPID MOVE👇Image
Transparency: The Glass House Principle

Unlike a Ponzi scheme - which operates with the opacity of a Swiss bank account managed by a mime - this strategy broadcasts its intentions with the subtlety of a Times Square billboard.

Every detail is meticulously documented in public filings, prospectuses, and financial statements that are more transparent than your ex's Instagram stories.

The beauty here is almost philosophical:

How can something be fraudulent when it's literally telling you exactly what it's doing?

It's like a magician who starts every trick by explaining exactly how the rabbit gets in the hat, then charges admission anyway.

People still buy tickets because they appreciate the craftsmanship.

Investors aren't being hoodwinked. They're making informed decisions with more data than most people use to choose a Netflix show.

Bernie Madoff's investors thought they were funding some mystical arbitrage genius; these investors know they're funding dividend payments through equity sales.

One group got bamboozled by smoke and mirrors, the other is consciously participating in corporate finance theater.

The difference is the same as between being pickpocketed and voluntarily buying overpriced coffee... both might leave you poorer, but only one involves deception.
Voluntary Participation: The Stockholm Syndrome That Isn't

Here's where the Ponzi comparison completely derails:

New common stock buyers aren't victims stumbling into a honey trap... they're sophisticated actors making calculated market decisions.

They're not being lured with promises of "guaranteed 20% returns from our proprietary trading algorithm" while the money actually goes to pay earlier investors' fake profits.

Instead, they're purchasing shares at prevailing market prices, armed with full knowledge of the company's structure, strategy, and the fact that their investment might literally be used to pay someone else's dividend tomorrow.

It's the financial equivalent of knowingly buying a ticket to a magic show where the magician openly admits there's no real magic...just sleight of hand and misdirection...

...but the performance is still entertaining enough to justify the price.

The sophisticated investor isn't a mark in this scenario; they're more like a patron of the arts.

They understand they're funding an elegant capital allocation mechanism, not falling for a get-rich-quick scheme.

When Ponzi victims discover the truth, they feel betrayed.

When ATM equity investors see their shares used to fund preferred dividends, they nod approvingly and perhaps buy more... because that's exactly what they signed up for.

It's the difference between being conned and being a connoisseur.
Read 12 tweets
Aug 20
🧵Bitcoin: The Ontological Violence of Sound Money

You're not poor. You're trapped in humanity's most successful hallucination.

This will BLOW YOUR MIND in understanding the matrix and make you understand Bitcoin on a PRIMAL and VISCERAL level👇Image
The Recursive Nightmare of Fiat

Fiat money is a recursive hallucination of itself.

A Möbius strip of circular references with no exit.

Each dollar derives its "value" from another dollar, backed by Treasury bonds, backed by the "full faith and credit" of a government that prints the very currency it promises to repay you in.

This isn't economics, kids. It's ontological fraud.

We're living inside Baudrillard's third-order simulacrum: money that no longer refers to anything real, only to other symbols in an endless chain of deferrals.

The dollar is a map that burned the territory and convinced you the ashes were always the destination.
The Collapse of Monetary Being

The fiat system achieved something unprecedented in human history: it collapsed the ontology of value itself.

For millennia, money was grounded in material reality: gold's atomic immutability, silver's conductivity, even cattle's biological utility.

These weren't arbitrary; they were ontologically anchored in the physical constraints of reality.

Fiat severed this anchor. What we call "money" today is pure floating signification.

Symbols pointing to other symbols in an infinite regress of deferred meaning.

Your paycheck is denominated in units of collective amnesia about what money used to be.
Read 16 tweets
Aug 18
🧵How to Calculate the True Return of Bitcoin

If you don't outrun the money printer, your gains are FAKE.

$1,000,000 Bitcoin is cute, but purchasing power is the real test.

Here's how to calculate your real BTC return👇Image
Price going up is nice, purchasing power going up is the point.

Bitcoin at a higher dollar number only matters if your real return beats the rate at which dollars are being diluted.

Nominal returns are what you brag about, real returns are what you can actually eat.

The real return is the nominal return adjusted for inflation, the thing that tells you how much extra stuff you can actually buy.
Use a better yardstick than CPI when you think in macro.

Track the expansion of the money you are measuring with.

The broad U.S. money supply, M2, climbed from roughly $4.7T in 2000 to more than $22T by March 2025, which works out to about a 6 to 7 percent compound annual expansion with violent spikes along the way.

If your asset’s CAGR does not clear that monetary tide, your “gain” is a mirage.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(