1/ If there were a real famine in Gaza, you wouldn’t need invented death tolls, staged photos, or secret UN rule changes to prove it.
You’d need only to look.
But what we see, and what’s being hidden, tells a very different story.
Let’s examine the facts: 🧵
2/
The UN quietly halved the global famine threshold just for Gaza.
One of the report’s authors publicly defended Hamas’s vow to repeat 7 October.
The data was cherry-picked, contradictory surveys buried, and deaths fabricated to cross famine lines.
There’s other evidence, too
3/ 🛒 Food markets are open
💰 Prices for staples like flour, chickpeas, and salt are the same or lower than in the UK
🇮🇱 Israel is pumping in aid, but
🇺🇳 The UN failed to distribute it
📺 The media – BBC, Sky, NYT etc – barely report any of it…
4/ They still quote the man who claimed 14,000 babies would die in 48 hours, a claim now formally debunked, even by the UN.
They still cite the Hamas-run Health Ministry as a neutral source.
Why?
5/ Surely if this famine were real, no one would need to lie about it?
That they do, tells you something.
This isn’t humanitarian analysis, it’s narrative warfare.
The goal is to indict Israel, facts be damned.
Much of it is deeply suspect…
6/ Why hasn’t the IPC published its full dataset?
Why did they lower the famine threshold just for Gaza, and still had to invent 182 deaths to meet it?
Why does a so-called famine never show crowd scenes only ambiguous photos of individuals?
But, most fundamentally…
7/ The most basic question: Why doesn’t Hamas release the hostages to end the war?
Why is this not central to every diplomatic statement and media report?
Why does the media almost never mention that Hamas steals food aid, something even the UN admits?
That’s not all…
8/ Why do the lies keep multiplying?
Because the facts alone cannot sustain the narrative.
I’ve laid out all the evidence and unanswered questions in one place.
It’s time the myth collapsed under its own weight.
🧵1/ In a new BBC article about Hamas salaries in Gaza, the corporation leads with a sympathetic portrayal of Hamas employees struggling to get paid, while burying the real story:
🔻 Hamas looted aid
🔻 Hoarded $700 million in cash
🔻 Prioritises supporters over starving civilians
Here’s how the BBC frames it 👇
2/ First 650+ words of the piece:
☑️ "I may not return when I collect my salary"
☑️ "I got $300 in crumpled notes"
☑️ "I queue for flour"
☑️ Blame Israel for food shortages
All designed to elicit sympathy for Hamas loyalists and shift blame away from the group responsible for the war.
3/ Second half of the piece (buried):
💰 Hamas stockpiled $700 million in cash before starting this war.
🕳️ They hid it in tunnels under Gaza.
🛑 They tax their own people during war.
🚬 They sell cigarettes at $170/pack.
🍞 They give aid only to supporters.
1️⃣ New footage leaked from the internal BBC Zoom call about its Gaza documentary How to Survive a Warzone reveals a disturbing mix of evasions, false equivalences, and editorial delusion.
The clearest example? Equating Hamas with the Israeli military.
keep reading this 🧵
and read the full analysis via substack link in the last post.
2️⃣
A BBC Middle East correspondent asks whether the same diligence applied to Gaza contributors’ Hamas ties will be used for Israelis with links to the IDF. An exec replies: “There’s no one-size-fits-all.”
The IDF is the military of a democratic state, subject to law, oversight, and internal investigation. Hamas is a proscribed terrorist group that uses civilians as shields and children as tools.
Equating the two isn't impartial. It's obscene.
3️⃣ BBC Exec Deborah Turness claims it won’t air the documentary again… but it will consider slicing it up and repackaging “shorts” from the footage.
This assumes you can surgically remove editorial failure from a film built around it.
The narrator was a child – undisclosed to viewers as the son of a senior Hamas official.
The problem wasn’t just omission. It was the entire editorial judgment that let a child from a Hamas political dynasty frame the story as if neutral.
1/ The BBC report into its Gaza propaganda documentary tries to cover up misleading editing which claims a sequence was filmed on one single day, when it clearly was not.
The sequence in question, which I revealed in February, was introduced with a full screen graphic counting up to the words "245 days of war".
These graphics are used throughout the film to indicate specific times (as context) for the edited sequences shown.
Read more... 🧵
2/ What I spotted, and revealed, was that despite this being presented as the events of a single day, the child featured as a paramedic (an unbelievable idea already) was wearing several different pairs of shoes and had had a haircut midway though the sequence claiming to be a mass casualty incident in a war zone!
Curiously he did wear the same T-shirt throughout...
3/ So, the BBC's investigation was forced to admit the sequence "included scenes shot on different days" and the impression it was filmed on one single day was "reinforced by the fact that that the child was wearing the same clothes throughout" (the t-shirt, not the shoes).
Despite this clearly deliberate attempt at wardrobe continuity, they do not suspect any deliberate intention to mislead.
In fact, the report claims the sequence "did not make any assertions as to how what was shown fitted into the broader chronology of the Israel-Gaza war."
🚨 Greta Thunberg’s vanity flotilla has been intercepted—calmly and without drama—by Israel’s navy.
No casualties. No spectacle.
Just the quiet end of another misguided attempt to breach Israel’s legal blockade.
Here’s what actually happened 🧵
Yet again, the Mediterranean was used as a platform for self-congratulatory theatre.
This time, it ended swiftly.
👉 The Madleen—a vessel heavy with symbolism and sanctimony—set sail in defiance of Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza.
Israel responded with precision and restraint.
Elite naval commandos from Fleet 13 boarded the ship peacefully.
The Madleen is now sailing toward Ashdod.
Its passengers—including Greta Thunberg, activist turned moral tourist—are safe and well, provided with sandwiches (plastic wrapped, sorry Greta) and water.
1️⃣
A British Jew was arrested, detained overnight, and charged—for holding a satirical sign mocking Hezbollah’s leader.
Police claimed it might offend pro-Hezbollah protesters.
Yes: he was prosecuted in case a supporter of a banned terrorist group took offence…🧵
2️⃣
The placard showed Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah with the words “beep, beep, beep”—a reference to a 2006 Israeli strike where explosives hidden in pagers killed 42, mostly Hezbollah operatives.
Nasrallah survived. A week later, he was killed.
It was clearly political satire. Like the famous coconut cartoon…
3️⃣
A week after the protest, two police vans and six officers turned up at his home.
They searched the entire house looking for the placard—opening drawers, rummaging through his partner’s belongings, even her underwear.