Saggezza Eterna Profile picture
Aug 29 16 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Political leaders are forged in the crucible of conviction. Political products are assembled in the backrooms of a corrupt machine.

Kamala Harris is not a leader. She is a product. A perfectly focus-grouped, ideologically hollow vessel, manufactured by the D.C. establishment to acquire and maintain power.

They have sold you a narrative of a principled trailblazer. The reality is a story of ruthless opportunism.

This thread is the deconstruction of the most carefully manufactured politician of our time. Yet, a true failure. 🧵🧵Image
Today, we must conduct a political autopsy on the career of Kamala Harris, a woman the Democratic machine has anointed as its future. Her record is not one of principle, but of pure, transactional ambition. Image
Her career was not born from a grassroots movement; it was a gift from a political machine. Her rise began in the 90s, when her powerful patron, Willie Brown, appointed his then-girlfriend to two lucrative state commission posts. Her entire career is built on this foundation of elite patronage, not popular will.Image
As San Francisco DA, she cultivated a "progressive prosecutor" myth. The reality? A brutal betrayal of law enforcement. When SFPD Officer Isaac Espinoza was murdered by a gang member, Harris refused to seek the death penalty, a decision so outrageous that Democrat Sen. Dianne Feinstein publicly rebuked her at the officer's funeral.Image
Her office's "toughness" was reserved for the innocent. Her prosecutors were found guilty of "highly prejudicial misconduct" in the wrongful conviction of Jamal Trulove, who spent six years in prison for a murder he didn't commit. The city paid him $13.1 million for the injustice. Harris has never answered for it.Image
Her most cruel policy was the war on parents. She championed a punitive anti-truancy law that threatened jail time for parents of kids who missed school. This authoritarian policy disproportionately harmed poor and minority families, revealing a prosecutorial instinct to punish the vulnerable, not a progressive desire to help them.Image
As she climbed the ladder, her "principles" became conveniently flexible. As DA, she was morally opposed to the death penalty. As California AG, when it was politically useful, her office defended the state's death penalty in court. A stunning flip-flop that reveals her only true ideology is advancement.Image
Her most shameless reversal was on policing. As a prosecutor, she was a "top cop" who wanted more police. By 2020, chasing the radical base, she praised the "defund the police" movement's goals and lauded LA's mayor for cutting the LAPD's budget. She is an ideological chameleon who will wear any skin to gain power.Image
She played the same game with healthcare. During the 2020 "primary", she raised her hand to abolish private health insurance and co-sponsored Bernie's "Medicare for All" bill. Once she faced scrutiny, she abandoned the position completely. Her platforms are not convictions; they are costumes.Image
Her most cynical moment was the busing debate. She launched a deeply personal, racially charged attack on Joe Biden (who had dementia and cancer) for his stance on busing, only to admit days later that her own policy position was identical to his. It was a disgusting piece of political theater, weaponizing race for a viral moment.Image
Her tenure as Vice President was defined by failure, most notably as the "Border Czar." Tasked with addressing the root causes of the migration crisis her administration created, she achieved nothing. Her only memorable contribution was a single, insulting plea: "Do not come." A historic display of incompetence.Image
Her ascension to the top of the ticket in 2024 was a slap in the face to democracy. After getting zero votes and dropping out of the 2020 "primary" in disgrace, she was "anointed" by the party elite in an undemocratic coronation, bypassing the will of the voters entirely. Image
Even her own party's allies saw it as a sham. Black Lives Matter publicly condemned the "undemocratic process" and the attempt by "billionaire donors" to install a nominee without a primary vote. When BLM is calling out your lack of a democratic mandate, you have a serious problem.Image
Her relationship with Gavin Newsom reveals her true nature. They are not allies; they are rivals from the same political machine, locked in a cold war for power. Their public support for each other is a thin veneer over a lifetime of ruthless ambition. Her only real loyalty is to herself.Image
From her manufactured career launch to her record of prosecutorial abuse and her endless, shameless policy flip-flops, the pattern is clear. There is no core. There are no convictions. There is only a hollow vessel, perfectly calibrated to reflect the political desires of whatever audience she is trying to win over.Image
Kamala Harris is the ultimate political product of a corrupt, decaying system. She is a woman who has stood for everything, and therefore stands for nothing. She is a warning: this is the kind of empty, power-hungry charlatan a party produces when it has lost its soul. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Saggezza Eterna

Saggezza Eterna Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @FinalTelegraph

Aug 30
While the media Praetorian Guard continues to celebrate their farcical E. Jean Carroll verdict, the counter-offensive has already begun. This is not a defense. This is a declaration of the inevitable victory to come.

They thought a fake verdict from a rigged court could stop a movement. They thought a number—$83.3 million—could intimidate a lion. They were wrong.

This was never about justice. It was a psychological operation—a meticulously planned political hit designed to demoralize you.

But the psyop is already failing. The final act of this political theater is coming, and it will not end the way the swamp intended.

This thread is the deconstruction of the greatest political hoax in modern history.Image
President Trump's attorney, Alina Habba, has already announced the final act. E. Jean Carroll will receive ZERO. Not one cent. In the end, it is she who will be paying President Trump's legal fees. This is not a legal battle; it is a story of retribution waiting to be written. Image
First, let's dismantle the lie of the $83.3 million judgment. It is a paper tiger. A politically engineered number for shock headlines. President Trump immediately posted a bond, freezing the entire verdict. No money will ever change hands. The figure is a placeholder for a lie that is about to be legally dismantled on appeal.Image
Read 16 tweets
Aug 30
There is a hidden war being waged against America. It is not fought with armies, but with chemistry and currency. The fentanyl that poisons our children on Main Street is financed by a river of dark money flowing from the highest levels of the Chinese state.

The Trump administration's Treasury Department has just exposed this unholy alliance.

This is not a crime wave. It is an act of financial and chemical warfare.

This thread is the intelligence briefing the corporate media will never give you.🧵Image
The new Trump Treasury has just dropped a bombshell report that should be the lead story on every network. It confirms our worst fears: Chinese money laundering networks have funneled over $312 BILLION in illicit cash through the U.S. Image
This is not a story about white-collar crime. This is the financial engine of our nation's destruction. This $312 billion directly financed the Mexican drug cartels who are flooding our country with fentanyl, and the human traffickers who are selling children into slavery at our border.Image
Read 17 tweets
Aug 30
The vultures are circling, drunk on their own sick fantasies. The entire fake news apparatus just exploded over a twisted JD Vance quote about a "terrible tragedy," launching a vile #TrumpIsDead rumor.

This isn't journalism. This is a demonic ritual. The TDS-fueled death cult praying for the end of a man they can't beat.

They are about to be sorely disappointed.

This thread is a takedown of the most pathetic lie yet. 🧵Image
Let's dissect this coordinated psyop. It starts with the media deliberately twisting a JD Vance quote. Then, the digital sewage pipes pump out a fake, idiotic Simpsons "prediction" meme to make it go viral. All to create a lie they can report on as "news." #FakeNews Image
And like clockwork, the ghouls came out to dance on a grave that doesn't exist. Hollywood elites, blue-check journalists, and basement-dwelling trolls celebrating the rumored death of a sitting President. Never forget who these people are. Their masks are off. #TrumpLives Image
Read 17 tweets
Aug 29
Western civilization was built on Enlightenment values: liberty, reason, and individual rights. But a shadow creeps across it—not as guests seeking harmony, but as conquerors wielding the sword of jihad.

A certain type of asylum seekers are not immigrants yearning to integrate. They are invaders, cloaked in the language of victimhood, here to subjugate and replace. The left's multicultural myth is their Trojan horse.

They rape our daughters, demand our laws bend to Sharia, and plot our downfall—all while elites call it "diversity." This thread rips the veil off the greatest deception of our age. 🧵Image
Today, we dissect the Islamist invasion of the West—not as "refugees" or "minorities," but as a calculated conquest echoing the caliphates of old. Their goal isn't coexistence; it's domination. History screams the warning, but the woke whisper "Islamophobia." Image
Recall the gates of Vienna in 1683: Ottoman armies halted at Europe's edge. Today, no armies march—only "migrants" flooding borders, demanding welfare while plotting supremacy. In Sweden, once a beacon of peace, Muslim-majority areas like Malmö are no-go zones where police fear to tread, ruled by gang violence and Sharia patrols.Image
Read 16 tweets
Aug 28
Absolutely WILD report on how fast and surely socialism KILLS.

Socialism isn't a compassionate alternative. It's a poison with a 100% fatality rate for freedom and prosperity.

They promise you a paradise, but every single time in history it has led to the same destination: poverty, tyranny, and mass graves.

This isn't a theory. It's a body count.

THREAD: The Road to Hell is Paved with Socialist Intentions.🧵Image
Part I: The Marxist Blueprint - From Socialism to Communism

The intellectual foundation of 20th-century revolutionary movements rests on the work of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, who envisioned socialism not as a final destination but as a necessary, transitional phase leading to a "higher phase of communist society". This transition is predicated on the abolition of private property and the resolution of class struggle, a process that inherently requires the concentration of immense power within a state apparatus to forcibly restructure society.  

In their foundational texts, Marx and Engels often used the terms "socialism" and "communism" interchangeably to describe their vision for a post-capitalist society. Over time, particularly by the late 19th century, "socialism" became the more common term adopted by Marxists to describe their ultimate goal. This historical context is critical, as it challenges the modern assertion that the totalitarian states of the 20th century were "communist" but not "socialist," when in fact, the architects of these systems saw the two as inextricably linked stages of a single historical process.  

The most explicit articulation of this process appears in Marx's Critique of the Gotha Programme. Here, he outlines two distinct phases of the post-capitalist world. The first is a "lower phase of communist society," which Vladimir Lenin would later popularize under the term "socialism". This socialist stage is characterized by the principle of "to each according to his contribution" and is still marked by the "birthmarks of the old society from whose womb it emerges". Following this transitional period, a "higher phase of communist society" would emerge, a utopian state operating on the principle "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs!".  

Central to this entire project is the abolition of private ownership of the means of production, to be replaced by cooperative or public ownership. The socialist mode of production aims for "production for use"—the direct satisfaction of human needs—rather than production for profit. This requires the elimination of commodity production and the law of value that governs capitalist economies. The mechanism for achieving this is a revolutionary seizure of power by the proletariat, an event Marxists see as the inevitable result of the internal contradictions and class conflict inherent in capitalism.  

This theoretical framework, however, contains a critical flaw that enables indefinite state control. The distinction between a "lower" and "higher" phase of communism creates a permanent state of transition that provides an infinite justification for the state's power. The "higher phase" is an abstract and utopian horizon, achievable only after productive forces have massively increased and human consciousness has been fundamentally remade, such that labor becomes "life's prime want". As there are no clear metrics for achieving these conditions, a ruling party can perpetually claim that society is not yet ready for the "higher phase." The "transitional" socialist state, with its coercive powers, is thus never dismantled. The transition becomes the destination, and the promise of a future utopia becomes the rationale for a permanent dictatorship.Image
Part II: The Leninist State - Forging the "Dictatorship of the Proletariat"

It was Vladimir Lenin who translated Marx's abstract theories into a concrete and ruthless political program. In his seminal 1917 work, The State and Revolution, Lenin laid out the practical mechanics for achieving and consolidating socialist power. His framework makes clear that the "dictatorship of the proletariat" is not a benign form of workers' democracy but a centralized, violent state apparatus designed to systematically crush all opposition and enforce the transition to communism.

Citing Marx and Engels, Lenin strips the state of any pretense of being a neutral arbiter of social disputes. He defines it with stark clarity as a "special organization of force: it is an organization of violence for the suppression of some social class". In the context of the proletarian revolution, this means the state becomes a weapon wielded by the working class to suppress the now-overthrown bourgeoisie. This worldview rejects any possibility of reform or peaceful coexistence; the state is an instrument of class warfare, and its purpose is to win that war by any means necessary.  

Consequently, Lenin argues that the working class cannot simply take control of the existing "ready-made state machinery" of the bourgeois government. Instead, it must "break up, smash" it entirely. This doctrine calls for the complete destruction of existing legal, political, and social institutions to clear the way for the new socialist order. The goal of the revolution is to establish the proletariat as the new ruling class, and this new class requires its own state to "crush the resistance of the exploiters" and to organize the new economy. This is the explicit and primary function of the "dictatorship of the proletariat".  

While Lenin reiterates the Marxist belief that this new workers' state will eventually "wither away" once class distinctions are fully abolished, this is presented as a distant and almost secondary outcome. The immediate and overriding task is the violent consolidation of power. The theoretical promise of a future stateless society is used to justify the creation of the most powerful and absolute state imaginable in the present. This creates a profound and tragic paradox. The mechanism for achieving a stateless society is the total concentration of power in a new, more ruthless state. The means (totalitarianism) are in direct contradiction to the stated ends (freedom), but the utopian nature of the end is used to legitimize the brutal nature of the means. The promise of future liberty becomes the rationale for present-day tyranny.Image
Read 17 tweets
Aug 28
Jen Psaki has ZERO credibility. Let's expose her once and for all. She is an outright horrible person by every possible standard. She's a liar, a cheat, and a coward. Here are the receipts. 🧵

The mask didn't just slip; Jen Psaki ripped it off herself. After a horrific shooting at Annunciation Catholic School in Minneapolis, her immediate, visceral reaction wasn't solace for the grieving, but sneering contempt for their faith.

Her words: “Prayer is not freaking enough... Enough with the thoughts and prayers”.  

In a moment of tragedy for a Christian community, her first instinct was to mock the very act of prayer as a useless, primitive impediment to the Left's political agenda. This is the cold, elitist heart of the modern Left laid bare.Image
Psaki’s anti-Christian animus isn't a personal failing; it's a reflection of official policy. Her tweet was the public relations cover for an administration that weaponizes the state against people of faith.

Consider the evidence:

The Biden DOJ launched a campaign to prosecute peaceful, pro-life Christians with federal charges and prison sentences for the crime of praying outside abortion clinics.

The Biden FBI generated an internal memo targeting "Radical-Traditionalist" Catholics as potential domestic terrorists, suggesting infiltration of their churches.

The Biden White House declared Easter Sunday, the most sacred day for Christians, as the "Transgender Day of Visibility".

Psaki’s mockery isn't an outlier. It's the party line.Image
How does the Left justify this persecution? By inventing a boogeyman. Psaki herself has warned of "Christian nationalist extremists". This is a deliberate, manufactured smear tactic.

Step 1: Conflate traditional Christian belief and patriotism with "extremism."
Step 2: Use this new, terrifying label to justify government surveillance and action (like the FBI memo).
Step 3: When the state then targets Christians (like pro-life grandmothers), it's no longer religious persecution—it's a "necessary" action against a supposed threat.

Psaki’s rhetoric provides the air cover for the DOJ’s ground assault on religious freedom.Image
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(