Greg Mushen Profile picture
Aug 29, 2025 22 tweets 7 min read Read on X
VO2Max - How Walking Can Create an Elite VO2Max

Many people think that the only way to raise VO2Max is by doing HIIT.

But you can achieve a high VO2Max just with walking.

Walking is arguably the superior way to build it 🧵
In 2001, there was a landmark paper published. They took a VO2Max measurement at baseline and tracked the cohort for 10.7 years.

What they found was an inverse correlation between VO2max and all cause mortality. Image
This paper has been referenced for years, and many people believe that VO2max is one of the best proxy metrics for longevity?

But the data in this study was collected in the mid 80’s to mid 90’s, before HIIT was ever popularized.

So the way the people achieved high VO2max in the study was from low level aerobic exercise.
In a related analysis from the same KIHD dataset, most of the activity in the low-risk group was below 5.5 METs or too short to count as sustained moderate/vigorous.

Translation: the bulk of it was steady, moderate intensity movement, not HIIT or intense bursts. Image
Image
Subsistence Populations Have High VO2max

The mean VO2max for men ages 20-40 is 56.7. Image
But they achieve this just by walking. Just low and moderate intensity movement.

About 135 minutes of low level movement per day. Image
And while there are athletic benefits of getting a higher VO2max, there are marginal longevity benefits for higher VO2max.

Moving from the top 25% to the top 2% has marginal benefit in terms of survival rate, and risk of death of any cause. Image
Image
But it’s important to note that in hunter gatherer populations, deaths from cardiovascular disease are negligible, even above 60 years of age. Image
They have exceptional bloodwork, low fasting glucose, great blood pressure, low LDL, but wouldn’t be considered elite by modern standards. Image
But even the Tsimane, with modest LDL, and high rates of C reactive protein, a marker associated with increased cardiovascular risk, still have the lowest rates of CAC ever recorded. Image
This likely comes down to how fast they clear LDL.

In a consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society:

“The residence time of LDL in the circulation may be the critical factor in the relationship between plasma LDL subclass level and atherosclerosis risk, as it determines both exposure of arterial tissue to LDL particles and the potential of LDL to undergo proatherogenic intravascular modifications, such as oxidation.”Image
Image
And we see this in kinetic tracer studies. A single weekly supervised aerobic workout in T2D patients resulted in a positive change in mean residence time (MRT) for LDL.

Less exposure = less opportunity for retention. Image
Image
And we see the same thing in a meta analysis.

A new meta-analysis of 19 RCTs in overweight/obese (n=646) shows aerobic exercise improves blood lipids: lower LDL, TG, TC & increased HDL.

Interval training lowered LDL/TC more than continuous, while moderate continuous exercise raised HDL most.

Longer programs had bigger LDL effectsImage
But these RCTs were just 30–60 min on a treadmill/cycle, 3–5x/week.

Compare that to subsistence people walking 12–18 km/day, carrying loads, burning 2–3× more energy every day.

Those volumes shorten LDL residence time dramatically.

Hunter gatherers have much higher clearance
But it’s not just clearance, it’s higher mitochondrial density.

PGC-1a activation -> chronic aerobic movement upregulates mitochondrial biogenesis, oxidative enzymes, capillary density, the machinery that lets you actually oxidize fat/glucose efficiently.
While both HIIT and walking will activate PGC-1a, it comes down to total activation. While HIIT creates a higher amplitude, you can really only perform it twice a week, whereas, with walking, you can do it every day.
This study compared PGC-1a activation between HIIT and steady state.

“A single isocaloric bout of high-intensity cycling (~80% VO₂max) raises skeletal muscle PGC‑1a mRNA ~10×, versus ~3–4× after low-intensity (~40% VO2max), showing that exercise intensity, not just volume, is key for metabolic signaling.”Image
But, when work is matched, there is the same level of PGC-1a activation.

They used oxygen consumption (VO2) as the work proxy, ensuring total oxygen cost (and therefore energy expenditure) of the two trials was the same. Image
And this is where walking absolutely dwarfs VO2max.

Walking 15k steps a day: ~875 L/week
HIIT 2x/week: ~250-300 L/week

Even though your VO2max may be lower than an athlete, you’re getting superior clearance, and superior PGC-1a activation.
And while aerobic exercise can reduce coronary events by ~30%, in this study, there was no difference in all cause mortality between the sedentary group, and the vigorous running group!

The benefits conferred to the lower intensities.

Maybe it’s different with HIIT, but we don’t know.Image
So in summary:

1) You can achieve an elite VO2max from walking alone

2) The biggest benefit comes from being in the top quartile of VO2max

3) Continuous movement helps clear LDL (and glucose)

4) Vigorous exercise may have negative benefit

5) Walking long distances daily trumps HIIT in both clearance, and PGC-1a activation.

6) ~15k steps a day will put you in hunter gatherer range.
@Mark_Sisson @Alan_Couzens and I are going to make walking cool again.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Greg Mushen

Greg Mushen Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gregmushen

Feb 6
Longevity is determined by genetics + how long you can avoid disease.

The majority of disease avoidance is dependent on metabolic health.

Metabolic health = four controlled vectors: fuel selection, oxidative capacity under load, oxygen delivery, byproduct clearance 👇
To compress the thesis:

Metabolic health is the ability to select the appropriate fuel for the context, oxidize it efficiently under load, deliver oxygen to support that oxidation, and clear the resulting byproducts fast enough to avoid accumulation.
Fuel selection

Our bodies have seven fuels they can run off:

Fatty acids, glucose, glycogen, lactate, ketones, amino acids, and short chain fatty acids.

These fuels are selected contextually based on demand, availability, and constraints.
Read 25 tweets
Nov 24, 2025
Endothelial Health - Part 1

Think of your endothelium as the operating system for your blood vessels.

It is core infrastructure.

If it breaks, you get a cascading failure pattern we see in aging and chronic disease.

So how does this system actually stay healthy? 👇
The endothelium controls four things:

- blood flow
- vascular stiffness
- oxygen delivery
- inflammation

When it declines, all four start to fail.
When endothelial function slips, here’s what people actually notice:

Low blood flow -> cold hands/feet, brain fog, ED

High stiffness -> rising BP, pounding pulse

Low oxygen delivery -> fatigue, weak endurance

High inflammation -> joint aches, swelling
Read 21 tweets
Nov 11, 2025
There are two competing models in metabolism: The additive model, and the constrained energy model.

Arguments over which one is correct have been going on for nearly a decade.

But what if what we are seeing in the constrained model is just a misinterpretation of artifacts? 👇
The constrained energy model was a controversial model introduced in 2016. Not controversial version because the observations or data were wrong, but rather, it challenged what we previously thought about metabolism.
Previously, the additive model dominated, or that energy balance can be explained by the sum of where energy goes:

TEE = BMR + TEF + AEE + NEAT

BMR = base metabolic rate
TEF = thermic effect of food
AEE = planned exercise
NEAT = non-exercise adaptive thermogenesis
Read 24 tweets
Nov 8, 2025
Mushen’s Theory of Clearance Symmetry

Metabolic health isn’t about what you eat or how much you move. It’s about how efficiently you clear what you take in.

When flux slows, energy accumulates, and that accumulation produces maladaptive responses and negative feedback loops.
Glucose Dysregulation is impaired carbon flux

In a healthy system, glucose moves dynamically through states:

Dietary intake -> blood -> tissues -> mitochondria -> CO2 + H20

Key steps:

Uptake: GLUT transporters

Processing: glycolysis, pyruvate oxidation, TCA cycle

Clearance: oxidation or conversion to glycogen/lactate
So 200g of glucose would behave very differently in:

1) Someone who is sedentary - less tissue uptake due to GLUT4, less oxidation capacity due to reduced mitochondria, inefficient oxidation -> result: blood glucose high, insulin response high, high serum lactate

2) Someone running a marathon - high oxidative capacity, high oxidative demand -> blood glucose normal, minimal insulin response since glucose is being oxidized, any lactate is oxidized

Is sugar bad? Yes. If you don’t clear it.
Read 18 tweets
Nov 3, 2025
Longevity is a game of avoiding chronic disease for as long as possible. The more diseases you accumulate over time, the shorter you will live.

Subsistence populations are largely free of chronic disease, and despite wildly different diets, there’s one metric they share 👇
Most chronic diseases are flux issues. If our inputs exceed our outputs, that’s when we start developing disease.
Insulin resistance

For example, insulin resistance (except in genetic disorders) occurs when we are in a chronic energy surplus.

Over time, fat build up in cells (primarily ceramides).

This can happen in muscle, our liver, our fat, etc. but the pattern is the same.
Read 19 tweets
Oct 29, 2025
Deconstructing CICO vs CIM: What Actually Drives Sustainable Fat Loss

Nearly every chronic disease traces back to poor metabolic health.

But when it comes to fat loss, two camps dominate: CICO vs CIM.

Which model actually holds up, and what’s sustainable long term? 👇
First is the CICO camp. This is the energy balance model.

If energy balance is negative, you will lose weight.

If energy balance is positive, you will gain weight.

This is empirically true, and I’ve outlined the entire model here:
CICO is also remarkably predictive.

As a case study, I outlined how we could predict how long weight loss would take with Angus Barbieri, who famously lost 276 pounds by not eating for over a year.
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(