Post

More from @recusant_raja

Raja Miah

@recusant_raja

Aug 30

Here is @oldhamcouncil councillor for Waterhead NAVEED CHOWHAN. As you can see, he also works for @stagecoachgroup.

Can I request people contact @StagecoachGM and inquire whether they agree with their employee supporting an account that is inciting violence and attempting to endanger the lives of survivors of the Pakistani Rape Gangs.

Have a look at the screenshot of the next post and you will see what this Oldham bus driver is openly advocating I deserve.

Will @gmpolice go and arrest Cllr CHAUHAN? Will @stagecoachgroup suspend a bus driver that is sending messages encouraging JIHAD?

You can see the Pakistani Sectarian councillor, whose 'Oldham Group' repeatedly deny the existence of the Pakistani Rape Gangs, claim that I deserve this. 'This' being the incitement of murder from Jihadists.

Let me share with you a screenshot in the next post...

The fake Raja Miah Mbe @facebook account sent this message to a friend of mine this morning. He believed it was me he was speaking to. '....Raja, when I see you, I will smash your ugly fucking shit face in'.

Maybe @gmpolice would like to comment why they have yet to arrest this person. Maybe @stagecoachgroup would like to comment on their bus driver NAVEED CHOWHAN.

But it gets worse. Next post

Read 4 tweets

Raja Miah

@recusant_raja

Jun 11

10. A RACIALLY MOTIVATED AND RELIGIOUSLY JUSTIFIED CRIME

Let’s name this for what it is.

This was not random. It was not opportunistic. And it was certainly not race-blind. This was targeted. It was racial. And for many of the perpetrators, it was religiously justified.

White, working-class girls were dehumanised - called “trash,” “slags,” “white whores,” and “dirty kufar.” They were seen as morally corrupt, sexually available, and undeserving of dignity. This wasn’t casual bigotry, it was the foundation of the abuse.

This wasn’t just criminality. It was ideological.

Many offenders operated with a sense of entitlement, even moral superiority, rooted in a worldview that saw non-Muslim girls as subhuman. Their contempt extended beyond the victims - to British law, to Western values, and to any authority that tried to hold them accountable.

And yet, those who name this, who speak up for the victims, who demand justice - we’re the ones labelled dangerous. We’re called bigots, far-right, or worse.

But let’s be clear: it is not racist to defend White working-class girls from systematic abuse. It is not far-right to demand prosecutions, to expose enablers, or to insist that victims be heard.

- What is racist is the institutional cowardice that sacrificed these children to preserve a political fantasy.

- What is extremist is a state that protects its own reputation more than its own children.

- What is dangerous is a government too afraid to confront the religious justifications behind the abuse.

When ministers such as @JimfromOldham choose silence over truth and dogma over justice, it is unforgivable, especially when the consequence was the industrial-scale gang rape of this nation’s children.

This isn't just a scandal. It was betrayal on a national scale. And the longer we deny the truth, the longer the abuse continues.
_________

They Tried to Silence Us. They Failed.

Six years on, we’re still here. Still speaking the truth. Still refusing to back down. Every article. Every video. Every time I’ve stood up and said what others were too afraid to say has only been possible because people like you had my back.

But here’s the truth:
Tens of thousands read and share my work each week. But only a handful support it financially.

I have no corporate donors. No political party behind me. No corrupt media machine to protect me. What I do have is a community. A growing movement of people who care about truth, justice, and defending the voiceless.

If you’ve ever felt seen in my words, if this work has helped you make sense of a broken system, please don’t scroll past.

This fight is far from over. But I can’t do it alone.

🔴 Sign up to support the work:
Just £3/month or £30/year helps keep this mission alive. That’s 75p a week, pennies to most, everything to this cause.
👉 redwallandtherabble.co.uk

⚫ Or make a one-off contribution:
Every donation fuels the fight for a National Inquiry and keeps the truth in the spotlight.
👉 BuyMeACoffee.com/recusantnine
👉 paypal.me/RecusantNine

Without your support, they win. Without your help, the truth gets buried.

Stand with me. Let’s finish what we started.
- Raja 🙏

9. THE COVER-UP REACHES THE TOP

The failure to protect working class White girls from industrial scale gang rape from the Pakistani Rape Clans was never just about local councils or rogue police officers. This is about the British state.

Because the people who enabled these crimes - the ones who buried reports, silenced victims, threatened whistleblowers - weren’t just negligent. They were protected. Many of them were even promoted.

Some now sit in Parliament. Some wear party rosettes. Some shape national policy. And that’s why there’s no appetite for justice, because real justice would expose rot at the highest levels of power. It would mean admitting that senior officials, elected representatives, and civil servants weren’t just asleep at the wheel. They were complicit.

Maggie Oliver, the detective who blew the whistle in Greater Manchester, has seen it firsthand. She watched as evidence was suppressed, inquiries sabotaged, and predators protected for political convenience. Now she’s launched the #TheyKnew campaign, pushing for private prosecutions - because the state still refuses to act.

What does it say when a seasoned detective no longer believes in the justice system? It says the cover-up didn’t end. It was institutionalised.

This wasn’t a failure of policy. It was policy. It was the preservation of reputation over the protection of children. Power before principle. Image before innocence.

Until those at the very top are held to account, this scandal is not in the past. It is still happening. Right now.

8. WHY THEY STAYED SILENT THEN. WHY THEY REFUSE TO ACT NOW

The authorities did not fail by accident. They knew. And they chose not to act. Why? Because telling the truth was more dangerous to their careers than letting children be raped.

The fear of being called racist paralysed investigations. Political correctness became state policy. In the minds of officials, maintaining the illusion of a multicultural utopia mattered more than the real suffering of working-class White girls.

But it wasn’t just fear. It was more than corruption. It was complicity. Girls were sacrificed for votes. Local politicians traded silence for political power, turning a blind eye in exchange for block votes from their tightly controlled ethnic enclaves.

The message was clear: protect the image of the “community,” protect the political machine. Everything else - truth, justice, children - was expendable.

It was a grotesque pact: power in exchange for silence.

And behind that silence was a system utterly unprepared, culturally, morally, ideologically, to face what it was up against. These weren’t crimes the British state had the vocabulary, the conviction, or the courage to name.

Religious justifications for rape? Clan hierarchies enforcing silence? Honour codes backed by threats and violence? Racism from Pakistanis towards White girls? These didn’t fit within the neat confines of diversity training and safeguarding protocols. So the state looked away.

They minimised. They buried reports. They silenced victims. They redefined crimes. Because naming the truth would have shattered too many comforting lies.

And still, that silence lingers. Even now, the same people who covered it up are in charge of “fixing” it. They stayed silent then. They stay silent now. Because the truth still terrifies them more than the crime.

Read 10 tweets

Raja Miah

@recusant_raja

May 17

5. PAKISTANI RAPE CLANS ARE DISTINCT FROM OTHER TYPES OF ABUSE

Not all child sexual exploitation is the same. Institutional abuse, online exploitation, familial abuse, these are all distinct crimes, each with their own patterns, perpetrators, and methods.

What we are talking about here is a racially targeted, religiously legitimised and culturally organised form of predation. It involved grooming, trafficking, gang-rape, and systematic abuse by networks of men who often shared not only ethnicity and religion, but also a belief system that dehumanised their victims and viewed them as lesser. As disposable.

This wasn’t random or opportunistic. It was structured, sustained and systemic. It was allowed to continue for years, often with the silent complicity of institutions afraid to speak the truth.

It is crucial to acknowledge this distinction. Because without naming it, we cannot confront it. Without confronting it, we cannot protect future victims.

The much lauded IICSA report failed to recognise this specific form of abuse because it prioritised political correctness over uncomfortable truths. By avoiding any honest analysis of the racial, religious, and ideological drivers behind these crimes, its final report offers recommendations that are generic, toothless, and entirely unfit to address the problem it refused to name.

Ask @LucyMPowell if anything what I share is a small trumpet or dog whistle.

_________

For those new to me, I'm Raja Miah MBE. I spent six years leading a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs.

During this time @UKLabour politicians and @gmpolice tried and failed to imprison me to stop me campaigning. I would not be surprised if attempts were being made yet again to arrest and silence me because I am sharing the information I currently am doing.

If my work has ever mattered to you, if you’ve ever read an article, watched a video, or felt seen in a way no one else has shown you, please don’t scroll past this.

I don’t have corporate backers. I don’t have a party machine behind me. I’m not backed by corrupt officers or media gatekeepers. What I have is you - people who care about truth, justice, and standing your ground.

The other side has money, power, and institutions. We have the truth and each other. If you want this work to continue, if you believe it must continue and can afford to do so, you can also support me and sign up to my work here:
redwallandtherabble.co.uk

Everything I publish is 100% free. There are no paywalls or locked content. This cause is too important for that. I only ask you financially support me if you can afford to do so.

Buy me a coffee:
BuyMeACoffee.com/recusantnine
Support via PayPal:
paypal.me/RecusantNine

PLEASE help grow our numbers so that we can continue to pressure the government and help secure justice.
redwallandtherabble.co.uk

- Raja 🙏

4. THE HISTORICAL PRECEDENT

The mindset that underpinned the actions of those responsible for the industrial scale gang rape of working class White girls has deep historical roots and a troubling ideological lineage.

In 1947, during the Partition of India, there were widespread and systematic rapes of Hindu and Sikh women by Pakistani mobs. Their barbarism was often justified using a combination of racist contempt and religious precedent.

In 1971, during the Bangladesh Liberation War, more than 200,000 Bengali women were raped by the Pakistani army. As in 1947, the targeting was ideological, and ethnically motivated. The difference this time - it was state sanctioned!

Victims were considered war spoils. Fatwas were issued justifying the rape of Bengali women and girls as a religious act. Rape camps were established where girls, from as young as 9 years old, were held. The aim was RAPE GENOCIDE. A Pakistani government strategy to wipe out the Bengali race.

It was during this time that the term rape jihad began to take shape. A phrase describing religiously sanctioned and racially targeted sexual violence used as a weapon of domination.

This ideology, rooted in a toxic combination of religious supremacy, racial contempt, and misogyny, did not disappear when families migrated to Britain. In some areas, it mutated. It adapted. It found cover in multicultural sensitivities and institutional cowardice. Which is why we see echoes of the same mindset playing out here in the UK.

There are reasons why many of the offenders do not view their actions as crimes, never mind shameful. Look how so many of the perpetrators openly cited religious and cultural justifications during their trials, where they described their White, non-Muslim victims as culturally inferior and immoral.

In a recent conviction, as guilty verdicts were handed down, several defendants even shouted “Allahu Akbar.” This was not a cry of remorse, it was a statement of belief. A declaration that their actions were part of a broader jihad, religiously justified against a society they reject.

This is not just criminality. It is a culturally embedded, religiously legitimised and ideologically driven form of abuse. And unless we confront it with honesty and moral courage, it will continue, shielded by our silence and enabled by our fear of causing offence.

3. RAPE CLANS NOT GROOMING GANGS

The term “gang” is misleading. It conjures images of disorganised youths loitering on street corners.

What we’re dealing with is far more insidious: clans - multi-generational, tightly knit, and often interrelated groups operating with the structure, discipline, and reach of organised crime syndicates.

These networks spanned towns, cities, and entire counties. They coordinated the movement of victims across regions, exchanged girls between locations like commodities, and laundered proceeds through restaurants, taxi firms, shisha bars, family homes and even mosques.

Their operations were facilitated by a culture of silence through tribal loyalty one one side and protected by social cohesion on the other. The atrocities they committed was overlooked by local authorities too paralysed, or too complicit, to intervene.

They borrowed tactics from heroin trafficking: smuggling girls across borders and safe houses just as they had drugs. Victims were hidden, silenced, brutalised, and threatened into submission. Families who tried to resist were intimidated into silence. Whistleblowers were smeared or ignored. Even the police were involved.

This wasn’t petty criminality. It was a parallel underworld, one that flourished in full view of the public, mocking a society too consumed by political correctness and institutional cowardice to confront it head-on.

Read 5 tweets

Raja Miah

@recusant_raja

Mar 25

1. Rewriting Telford: How a Judge Documented a Cover-Up, Then Denied It Happened

Tom Crowther KC's claim that he "did not come across in Telford any sense of a cover-up" is more than misleading, it's a dangerous distortion that compounds the very injustice he was appointed to address. His denial doesn't just contradict evidence; it betrays thousands of children whose suffering was systematically ignored, dismissed, and buried by those sworn to protect them.

What makes his denial all the more shocking is that his own Telford report, spanning four comprehensive volumes, provides overwhelming documentation of precisely the institutional behaviours that constitute a cover-up. The evidence he himself compiled and published contradicts his public statements, raising serious questions about his integrity and intentions.

2. TELFORD: A WASTELAND OF INSTITUTIONAL FAILURE

The brutal reality of Telford stands as one of Britain's most catastrophic moral failures:

- Children as young as 11 were drugged, gang-raped, and tortured while authorities looked away

- Victims were murdered for attempting to escape their abusers - including Lucy Lowe, burned alive with her family by her rapist

- Authorities labeled sexually exploited children as "prostitutes," effectively criminalising victims while shielding predators

- For four decades, from the 1980s onward, reports of industrial-scale abuse were methodically suppressed

- The scandal remained hidden until journalists, not politicians, police or the council, finally exposed that an estimated 1,000 children had been sacrificed to institutional indifference

- When the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse was established, Telford was deliberately excluded. Only relentless public pressure forced a separate investigation. The very one Crowther now claims found no evidence of a cover-up.

3. ANATOMY OF A COVER-UP

A cover-up isn't always men in darkened rooms signing pacts of silence. More often, it's a culture of wilful blindness, where inconvenient truths are buried beneath bureaucracy and cowardice:

- Whistleblowers silenced: Teachers, social workers, and junior police who raised alarms were marginalised and ignored

- Intelligence deliberately withheld: Vital information about perpetrators was not shared between agencies, allowing predators to operate in plain sight

- Investigations sabotaged: Cases were prematurely closed or simply never pursued

- Reports buried: Documentation of abuse was routinely downgraded, misfiled, or "lost"

- Victims intimidated: Girls brave enough to come forward were dismissed, blamed, or threatened with prosecution themselves

This is the textbook definition of institutional cover-up. It is the same pattern exposed in Rotherham, Rochdale, and Oldham. Yet Crowther claims to have seen "no sense" of it, despite his own four-volume report documenting these exact patterns of institutional suppression.

Read 7 tweets

Raja Miah

@recusant_raja

Jan 17

Just a week after the UK general election that took place on the 8 June 2017, Jim McMahon MP visited at least two mosques in Oldham where a senior member of the local branch announced @JimfromOldham was there 'to say big thanks to all the voters'.

Look closely and you will see McMahon sat inside, at the front of the mosque, next to one of the imams.

One of these mosques, Oldham Central Masjid, was reported in the Telegraph as involved in a 100% surge in postal votes in the area around the mosque.

Now ask yourself, why is an @UKLabour MP attending mosques to thank voters in an area that is reported as having an 100% postal vote surge?

FOI responses force from @oldhamcouncil, of whom McMahon had previously been leader, exposed how public funds had been used to 'loan' one of these mosque tens of thousands of pounds of tax payers money on an interest free basis. This was in addition to selling public land to the mosque at below market value.

Here is the FOI that exposed this. It makes for interesting reading as you will see how the Council attempted to first conceal this information.

whatdotheyknow.com/request/relati…

Read 5 tweets

Raja Miah

@recusant_raja

Jan 11

There is clear evidence that both @Keir_Starmer Minister @JimfromOldham and @UKLabour National Constitutional Committee Chair & @OldhamCouncil leader @shah_arooj conspired with the malicious blogger NEIL WILBY who tried to incite my murder.

Posts on X clearly demonstrate how McMAHON & SHAH openly encouraged WILBY whilst he conducted his malicious campaign of hate against me. Despite repeated reports to @gmpolice, WILBY was protected by @AndyBurnhamGM police force.

At what point will the Labour Party suspend both JIM McMAHON & his Pakistani gangster endorsed protege AROOJ SHAH?

This is an example of just one of WILBY's attempts to silence me and stop my campaign seeking a Public Inquiry into the gang rape of children.

This is a picture of the front door of the apartment block where I live. Have a look at how 'Rusty Wheels' account has the tagline truth or consequences

And here is how the campaign was encouraged by Dale Cregan's getaway driver Irish Imy - see the reference to a bombfire?

Read 5 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Raja Miah

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @recusant_raja

Raja Miah

Raja Miah

Raja Miah

Raja Miah

Raja Miah

Raja Miah

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!