Sheldon Whitehouse Profile picture
Aug 30 7 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Team Trump is purposefully raising your electricity prices, hoping you’ll be mad at your electric utility and not blame them. The benefit to them is extra dollars for their greedy fossil fuel donors.

Here’s how it works. 🧵
1. The Trumpsters make good on their crooked deal with fossil fuel donors to harass and harm fossil fuel’s clean energy competitors, competitors who actually made up 95% of all new power added to the grid last year.
2. Delaying that clean energy coming on line puts more dependence on polluting fossil fuel, so more pollution (they don’t care, they get to pollute for free) but also more consumption, meaning more revenue (bingo!) to fossil fuel.
3. Worse, polluting units that would not be called up if there was adequate clean energy on line, now get called up. Units that would be idle come on line, generating more revenue (bingo!) for the owners (while adding pollution).
4.  Worse still, the grid price is set by the last unit called up, and every unit gets paid that rate, so ALL the running units get paid more, adding more revenue (bingo!) to owners.
5.  Those added costs get passed through to utility consumers, often automatically without review, so utility bills skyrocket.

All that added cost to you is put in place by Trumpsters steering revenue (bingo!) to fossil fuel donors.
Get it? Don’t be chumped by Trump.

When your bill goes up, know where the blame lies.  
 ft.com/content/689243…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sheldon Whitehouse

Sheldon Whitehouse Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SenWhitehouse

Aug 8
Well, well, well. 

With Emil Bove safely through his sham Senate confirmation proceedings, the two Trump judges just lifted the three-months-long administrative stay that had kept any evidence of Bove’s contempt of court bottled up.

🧵

nytimes.com/2025/08/08/us/…
It gets worse: the two Trump judges then used “mandamus” to undo the district court’s unappealable order and halt the contempt proceedings entirely. First, abuse of administrative stay, then abuse of mandamus, to shield Trump mischief from review.
At all costs, judicial inquiry into Trump Department of Justice contempt had to be stopped, even the MAGA AG trying to “create a conflict” with a bizarre ethics complaint against the United States district judge. Two Trump judges did the deed.
Read 5 tweets
Aug 7
Why did I send this letter to the Chief Justice?

So he’d understand the full scenario that just touched the Judicial Conference (the administrative body of judges that oversees the operations of the Judicial Branch), which he convenes and chairs.

🧵 Image
Image
The saga begins with the much-reported battle over illegal deportations that played out in federal court, in the courtroom of Chief Judge Boasberg of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, a respected veteran of decades on the bench.
Federal judges, particularly senior and respected ones, aren’t used to being conned, tricked or lied to, particularly not by the government. DOJ’s conduct in the deportation proceedings caused Boasberg to find probable cause of criminal contempt.
Read 14 tweets
Aug 2
Republicans are saying that our opposition to Trump nominees is “unprecedented.” Seriously? Let’s take a look at some of the stuff that is really “unprecedented”:
A partisan rescissions bill pulling back funding that was agreed to by both sides in bipartisan appropriations agreements.

Over-ruling the Parliamentarian to destroy emissions standards to let their Big Oil donors sell more gasoline.
Appointing to a United States Court of Appeals a character involved in three prosecutorial misconduct episodes in six months, and a subject of pending contempt of court proceedings.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 1
A disappearing IG complaint about Emil Bove? What, “the dog ate it”? This Emil Bove mess could not smell much worse, until you sniff out the rest of the story.

🧵

nytimes.com/2025/07/31/us/…
This was a guy who set the all-time Department of Justice record for prosecutorial misconduct, with three significant episodes in six months (plus whatever cover-up he did of Jeffrey Epstein’s files — he wouldn’t answer). Nothing even comes close.
A misconduct complaint from the New York Bar was referred to the Department’s Office of Professional Responsibility, which never acted on it. (Bondi had cleared out the career OPR person and put in a MAGA person, so I doubt it got a hard look.)
Read 7 tweets
Jul 31
Here’s one easy question for Trump criminal lawyer Todd Blanche to have asked Ghislaine Maxwell: “How did Donald Trump’s letter for Jeffrey Epstein’s birthday book come to be in the book?”

🧵

washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/…
The Wall Street Journal reported that it was Maxwell who put the birthday book together for Epstein. We have seen her note to Epstein confirming that it was her. She would be the one who obtained the raunchy letter from Trump for his pal.
wsj.com/us-news/jeffre…
Trump, however, only weeks ago denied that he provided the letter, saying variously that it was “nonexistent” and “fake.” Here was a good chance for Blanche to confirm Trump’s story. Unless, of course, Trump was lying. If that’s the case, don’t ask.
Read 6 tweets
Jul 30
Ghislaine Maxwell has asked through her attorney for immunity regarding her possible testimony to Congress.

Her attorney is also talking about clemency for her.

Remember, immunity and clemency are two different things.

🧵
An immunity deal protects her from further criminal prosecution arising out of anything she discloses in her immunized testimony.

Most obviously, that would be immunity from perjury charges for lying under oath on a material matter in her testimony.
The Supreme Court’s manufactured “presidential immunity” similarly bars prosecution of Trump for actual crimes committed by him while in office, related in any way to his official duties. He doesn’t need an “immunity deal,” the Court gave it to him.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(