Much of economic growth comes not in the form of falling prices, per se, but from the introduction of new goods. Not including them will lead to us substantially understating welfare, and overstating inflation. But how do find the value of goods which didn’t exist? 1/ Image
We can calculate it by figuring out the price of a good which would set demand to 0, and then presume that this shadow price fell when it came into being. To know this, we must estimate the demand curve. Image
Hausman has data over a few years in 7 major metropolitan areas. His identification of the demand curve stems from local advertising campaigns, which he assumes shifts demand in that city but not elsewhere. The unobserved parts of demand are filled in by assuming convexity.
But there are a few complications. First, brands of cereal are substitutable for each other. Not including this overstates gains to the consumer. On the other hand, simply assuming a constant elasticity of substitution will overstate the gains badly.
In the case of CES demand, every good increases welfare by the same increment, which is obviously inaccurate. So he segments into different types of cereal, and while allowing for cross section elasticities, ignores brand to section elasticities.
Further, we need to take into account the ways that a brand affects other brands by the same company. It might take business away, but on the other hand, it also means that the customers who remain have more inelastic demand. Image
Put concretely, when GM introduces Apple Cinnamon Cheerios, the people who are still buying Honey Nut Cheerios are the ones who really like it. Thus, GM can charge a higher price.
Hausman estimates that the benefits to the consumer are larger than the losses from price discrimination. Apple Cinnamon Cheerios increased welfare by $78 million a year, and the consumer price index overstated inflation by at least 20% in ready-to-eat cereals.
Jerry Hausman, “The Valuation of New Goods under Perfect and Imperfect Competition” (1996)

tbres.su.domains/wp-content/upl…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nicholas Decker 🏳️‍🌈🌐🇺🇦

Nicholas Decker 🏳️‍🌈🌐🇺🇦 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @captgouda24

Aug 18
This is the job market paper of the year, and the best paper on industrial policy I have ever seen. Industrial policy can affect outcomes either directly by changing an area’s fundamentals, or by coordinating simultaneous investment. How important is each? Let’s find out. 1/ Image
Tishara Garg is studying the effects of industrial parks in India. These are plots of land set aside for industrialization, with substantial government promotion. These are not, to be clear, special economic zones like Shenzhen, but simply local initiatives. Image
The perennial problem facing people studying IP is that reduced form evidence is meaningless. Yes, it increases local employment. That says nothing about whether that simply redirected — or parasitized — activity that would have simply happened elsewhere. Image
Image
Read 14 tweets
Aug 16
How costly are poorly written laws? A team of Italian researchers argue that the drafting of Italy’s laws alone costs them 5% of GDP — or $120 billion a year! 1/ Image
Readers will note that the structure of the paper is rather similar to Gentzkow and Shapiro (2010), who studied media bias. In both cases, the first challenge is you need a treatment variable with cardinality.
They use proxies for the complexity of sentences, like length, clauses, and citations within a sentence. Image
Read 14 tweets
Aug 13
Why do I support capitalism? It is easiest to show by example. Feeding America is a network of food banks. In 2005, they switched from central planning to a price system. Sam Altmann (not that one) finds that this is equivalent to increasing donations by 32.7%. 1/ Image
The previous system worked like this: all the food banks would be in a queue. Whenever Feeding America got a donation of a truckload of food, they would go to the first bank in line. They would then have 4-6 hours to accept or decline the shipment.
Whether they accept or decline, they would then be shuffled back depending on whether their total poundage target had been met (which was based on local poverty). There are some serious problems. Food is of heterogenous quality, and different banks need different items.
Read 11 tweets
Jul 24
Good managers substantially increase production. What matters most is intelligence and economic reasoning, and people who want to be managers are worse at it because they are worse at understanding people’s emotions. 1/ Image
Measuring the effects of management is quite difficult, which is why they do this in the lab. Managers aren’t randomly assigned, which may — especially if managers are promoted for reasons only somewhat correlated with skill — flip the sign on the true effect. Image
I thought the experimental design was extremely sound. First, they evaluated people’s abilities on various cognitive tasks — you can see the three types of questions below. Image
Image
Read 8 tweets
Jul 22
The fundamental problem with Israel-Palestine is that the Israelis are too scared to take civilian casualties. Israel can be completely secure without the war, if they accept casualties. The only way to have no civilian casualties is to eradicate the Palestinians as a people.
Israel, again and again, gets sentimental. The exchange of 1027 prisoners for one man was an act of abominable cowardice, and served only to enable Hamas’s future actions.
Of course, it is the US which is sentimental now. We are quite taken by the plight of the hostages — we must “bring them back”. I don’t think Israel has much interest in a few hostages now, though — as long as they remain Gaza can be destroyed.
Read 9 tweets
Jul 17
Is GDP accurate? Barro argues that our measures of GDP are systematically biased because they include investment both when it occurs, and when we get higher output as a result. Thus, higher capital/output places will have spuriously higher GDP. 1/ Image
First, though, we should know what GDP is trying to measure. It is not measuring welfare — for that would take knowledge of how pleasant work is — but simply trying to give a sense of the resources available for consumption.
This means that we don’t count intermediate goods. GDP is computed as net value-added, or else GDP would be arbitrarily increased by the number of steps in the production process. The wheels, chassis, and body of a truck, for example, is only valuable insofar as it’s a truck.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(